Search results

yo Locutus... about your "groupthink" meme, how is it the collective denialsphere has no groupthink, no confirmation bias, no ideological bias, no conspiracy fronts, etc., etc., etc.??? Locutus, what's up with that? :lol: ya see... I'd ask you to cite that same, as you say, "past descredited...

oh my! A guy. "John L. Casey", with no related background, no formal journal publications in anything, an undergraduate science degree from a 'Tier 2' U.S. college... and... he's the single employee of his self-founded "Space and Science Research Center (SSRC)"... as Casey self-describes SSRC...

see localized and/or regional weather... you know, the thing that you're trying to improperly conflate with climate. When you titled this thread, did you intend "world" to mean..... localized and/or regional weather? Have you ever travelled outside your local area? It's a pretty big world out...

:mrgreen: well done Locutus! Why didn't you provide the linkage to that graph... of course, it's from an article by the world renowned "UKIP climate expert", Lawdy (fake Lawdy) Christopher Monckton. Tell me, do you consider that a step up from Steven Goddard? let me again provide the Pro Tip I...

since you appear to present RSS as an authority, I guess you'll have to accept what RSS actually states about tropospheric warming: but yes, their modeling hasn't matched observations for all latitudes... Northern latitudes, yes... other latitude groupings, no. Here's the RSS matching plot for...

yo Locutus! You're a veritable cut&paste wizard... do you have more... where you actually go beyond your unlimited twittersphere sources and offer your own understanding/interpretation of "those tweets"? Tweets... from the likes of Steven Goddard, no less! Here's a thought... Goddard has been on...

not all... I'm still holding court on a few of you 'usual suspects'. I kid, I kid! or actual board moderation could work to temper the thread distraction/derailing... particularly the purposeful kind.

the last dozen+ posts: a case in point to my 'mini-rant' in the other thread concerning 'clubhouse antics'... I'd like to take the time to respond to a prior post from member 'Blackleaf'. Why should I bother only to have it immediately buried by all this "peripheral conversation" that has...

no - in keeping with your nattering junkyard-dog act, why don't you answer my question? I answered yours... if it's not to your satisfaction, tough titty! For no other reason than to play silly-buggar, you're supposedly ticked because you aren't in the study's demographic group categorization of...

Ya, so?

why would quoting a study author(s) summary finding statement from a study abstract be any different from quoting from a related article that makes direct reference to the same study findings? So..... you'll accept a journalist's interpreted understanding of a study in a referenced article...

your question has been answered; if you don't accept it, that is certainly your perogative

you don't have to accept the study findings; that's your perogative. Since you claim to be neither white or conservative, your apparent difficulty with the study is that your, as you said, "identity parts", do not fit completely within the study's major finding's full demographic assignment. If...

you mean your... "Ya so" question? Is that your, "to be taken seriously" question?

you, as the reader... infer. You inferred incorrectly.

you shouldn't have taken the study finding to suggest "ALL" persons... fit, or don't fit, within the group categorizations. That, most definitely, is not the study finding.

the Daily Mail "journalist", David Rose, has absolutely no credibility, none whatsoever... the worst of the worst tabloid misinformers! again, that article speaks to a single year sea-ice extent change... year-to-year change. Let me focus you again on the 2 declining trend images I put forward...

as you started this thread, perhaps you should have re-titled it to focus on regional weather... given your apparent fixation with a "Mr. Gore" perhaps you should look farther... perhaps in... Australia!

speaking of "recovery" based on a single year reference is nonsense... notwithstanding the context with Extent is single versus multi-year ice. Single year ice is that ice most readily melted in the next year's melting season. Following are the trend lines for both Extent and Volume... for an...

Bear... the real world awaits... enjoy your CC Board day and presumed self-importance as your self-acknowledged, "CannibalTrollMan'! :lol: