Search results

right. It's bloody amazing you're just so, so, so, so, so shy in bringing forward any of your so-called facts! I'd think you'd be all "loud and proud" and wanting to share/showcase your "facts". :lol: hey cappy... do you keep posting that lil' image cause your butt hurts?

of course... puuurfect! I wouldn't expect anything different from you! Yet another example of a blustering, blathering denier who can't manage to back-up his statements/claims. Go figure.

aw shucks! Your lil clubhouse gets shaken up a bit and you go all goofy. It's a shame you take such exception to someone challenging your denier nonsense, hey! citation request... make sure you trot out your favourite "I ain't your google bitch" routine to provide you cover. yet another...

keep on with your shuck & jive routine. You're nuthin but a C&P wizard, at best! You beak-off making unsubstantiated statements/claims and when pressed to support your BS, you runaway, runaway!

huh! I thought your lil' clubhouse routine had me as "Fagro"... make up your juvenile minds! that "hockey stick raw data" you parrot about is in the public domain. You do realize there have been a brazillion other reconstructions since those early days, right... you do know that, right? Please...

queenie, wass wrong? no - I readily accept you are a full-fledged denier that talks shyte and can't back up a single thing you say... evah!

gee... doesn't take much to send you over the edge! Did you forget your meds this morning? You lookin' for some more of that drama you so cherish, hey drama queen!

what twaddle you write! Please provide your evidence that "it's cooling"... a reduced surface temperature warming rate... is not cooling! And, of course, why are you ignoring ocean warming? Cause you can? :lol:. Nice of you to showcase your propensity to propogate memes. There was no "shift"...

what's heelarious is that the loudest barker steadfast in his claim of there being "NO SUBSIDIES", in the face of my posting that report from the Auditor General's Office, decides to post extensively from that report over multiple posts... but never can quite bring himself to actually say he was...

there's the thing! You keep blathering on about "my sources"... after repeatedly prodding you to identify the sources you claim have been "caught lyin/cheatin", you finally trot out "NOAA". Of course, you continue to refuse to provide examples of said "lyin/cheatin"; instead you keep up your...

"crutch (denier)"... get over it! It's simply an identifying label; one not intended as a pejorative. You deny global warming, you deny AGW, you deny the greenhouse effect... you're a denier in that regard. Again, it's an identifying label; nothing else.

your first post focused on number; i.e., the frequency of storms. Your article focused on the 2 most recent years, 2013 & 2014. That's exactly why I replied to you with the same emphasis on number... frequency. And it's exactly why I challenged you in your statement "the oceans must be cooling"...

I only go by what you post... if you're now telling me you don't believe what you post, well... that's a whole new wrinkle you're adding, hey! says the guy who name drops and links to his presumed authorities... tell me, with your fixation on that Casey guy, are you fronting him as the next...

no need to insult... simply relish your denial! You clearly believe you know more than mainstream scientists, global-wide national academies of science, national & international scientific organizations, international and national scientific federations/unions/societies, etc.. And you showcase...

petros dance!

howzer... you're a "Sky Dragon"! Yes, you're in the fine company of some of the guys even the idiot Tony Willard Watts won't let lose on his anti-science WTFIUWT blog! So... since you flat out deny the greenhouse effect, I take it you presume it's the sun that's keeping the earth warm to the...

:lol: the guy was an ***-clown... but apparently you'll blindly accept anything!

jeezaz that's old news! He did get his shot in though... before he died! Is this significant to you? I could take one group, say the AGU, and counter with a throw down of thousands of names/cv's of the most prominent scientists in the world... or even within APS itself. But of course, that...

c'mon taxslave... step-up and come out of your shadow.

hasn't your affinty for that guy burned you enough already? Since Goddard has never formally published a damn thing in his life, he certainly is an authoratative souce to speak of funding grants!... oh snap, is that why he refuses to publish... he can't get any! 8O C'mon Locutus, clue your guy...