Search results

oh my! So your conspiracy extends to manipulating the surface temperature record? Again, just who/what is behind your claimed conspiracy? which one(s) are you ignoring?

admit what? I asked you to make your (original) question relative to today's relatively recent global warming. You refuse to do so. Apparently you want to say something about geomagnetics and a "loss of protection"... you just can't bring yourself to actually making a relative statement in that...

I know you want to say something here; don't be shy... just say it.

magic cycles?

what changes climate? Does climate just magically "change"?

I didn't say any such thing; however, you can continue to flaunt your pet theory for all it's worth... when the legitimate scientific community accepts it as the principal causal tie behind today's relatively recent warming, then... and only then... will your pet theory have credence.

allrightee! In viewing another thread, I note there is a member named Blackleaf... is this who you're claiming is behind your claimed "CO2 conspiracy"? Apparently, you're quick to claim conspiracy, but unwilling/unable to state who/what is behind your claimed conspiracty.

what's your point in relation to global warming and attribution relative to the relatively recent warming?

what is absurd about the statements... these statements:

I'm most appreciative of you stating your acceptance that the ocean has warmed; perhaps some of the other 'buddies' around here will take note. You seem to be going a long way to avoid any suggestion that, under particular conditions, ocean layers mix... why so?

I asked:

says the guy fronting an attribution that has no legitimate acceptance. But really... you mentioned "Blackleaf" was behind your claimed conspiracy keeping your pet position/theory down. I'm not familiar with "Blackleaf" - please elaborate.

other than the reeediculous geomagnetics guy, no other buddies have offered didly-squat. Lot's of bluster though; there's sure a lot of bluster coming from other buddies!

good for you; bias confirmation runs strong around here, doesn't it?

Blackleaf???

good on ya! Yes, per the geological record, greenhouse gases (principally CO2) have been shown to play a role in past climate changes.

who/what is behind your claimed "CO2 conspiracy"?

sir, that's borderline conspiracy. Can't you ramp it up a bit to bring it full circuit? Everybody keeping the poor denier man/scientist down!

yeesh! Another guy who attributes warming to "coming out of the LIA"!!!

that's novel! Usually the denier line is "geomagnetics, solar variability and natural climate change". Why do think those particular aspects haven't been embraced by the scientific community, at large?