Search results

no - all data adjustments are backed by peer-reviewed/peer-responded scientific publications describing and qualifying the respective adjustments. What do you have next... conspiracy?

the USHCN, open and transparent:

that's quite definitive - do you have examples?

oh snap! That's a zinger, particularly since I care soooo much about what you think!

sumthin like... the workin' man gets no respect from petros?

you could say the same thing about millions of people. Using your apparent measure, who dreams of becoming, for example, a retail grocery clerk... or a shelf-stocker, or a retail cashier... or a butcher... or a cab-driver, or a bus-driver, or a brazillion other legitimate and worthy jobs that we...

it's clear you have more than a simple lack of respect for anyone you consider doing menial work... or work that is, apparently, below your perceived station. The very fact you would reach to label me "as a drywaller", in a most denigrating and derogatory manner, to me, suggests you think your...

says the guy who I'm quoting who just labeled me the exact same thing! C'mon, up your game, hey! here's your first clue: weather ain't climate. :smile:

go with your apparent strengths... go with your (attempted) marginialization best. You seemed to label me a drywaller in the sense that you don't respect "the workin' man". Why are you such an unhappy (claimed) scientist? c'mon Bear, we've got off on the wrong paw! Lesbe friends.

You talking to me - Robert De Niro - YouTube

weak, very lame Cappy. Tell me, are you a true disbeliever? A true one? Do you doubt the U.S. and global temperature records? Why... do you doubt it's warming? Just how true are you?

as a "claimed scientist" what have you published? Of course, the point was to highlight the hack Steven Goddard has no scientific chops, has never published a damn thing, yet the almighty denialsphere blindly accepts his tripe in all their collective claimed "skeptical" best.

oh my... are there really some around here who question the surface temperature record? No legitimate skeptic does so any more! You guys are, uhhhh.... skeptics, right? Steven Goddard!!! The guy... the denier blogger... who has never published anything in a scientific journal... that guy? The...

why is it the loudest barking deniers don't know the basic fundamentals of the carbon cycle? considering the greenhouse effect is required for human survival... where's the joke?

oh my! And here I thought human-breathing associates to the natural carbon-cycle and isn't factored into atmospheric levels. Quick, someone better update world governments and how they're improperly calculating emission inventories!

inquiring minds: why such a southernly positioned jet-stream and why the blocking events? Just natural, hey?

if you choose not to factor the actual emission output of your "number of emitters", what's really your point here?

whatever floats your boat! Bring it!

bookmarked... in the miraculous circumstance that you might ever bring forward a grammar fail. Miraculous, cause apparently, along with being the board grammar monitor, your grammar is beyond reproach - yes?

well yes, there has been the establishment of a 'Green Climate Fund' to support projects, programmes, policies and other activities in developing countries; most particularly the adaptive needs and challenges of developing countries in addressing climate change... but in the overall, world...