Search results

clearly... although my experience suggests your 20% is a most generous assessment! I expect we'll next read him hyping his self-declared trollish alter-ego, "Cannibal Troll"!

if you want to say something, have the "Retired Soldier" guts to say it directly and make your pointed accusation. yet another thread for you to shyte on hey Bear? Do you ever... ever... actually contribute to thread topics, or do you accept your own relegation to your presumed drive-by relevance?

you don't need your described "global warmists" to tell you anything about anything... it's called the greenhouse effect, a fundamental precept of science (more correctly GHG in the atmosphere, rather than your 'carbon reference') the earth is in a long-term natural cooling cycle... however...

guys, guys... your 'shuck & jive' routine runs strong, runs deep! Why, I do believe it's your own personal coping protection measure... in line with the aforementioned study's protection response to perceived threat: "identity-protective cognition" :mrgreen:

the related study points to a protection response to perceived threat: "identity-protective cognition". The response has conservative white males, more so than any other group in American society, justify and defend the American economic system because it’s the system through which their...

apparently, that graphic I put up struck a little too close for theBear! :lol:

a bit of levity, get over it!

given the recent U.S. election results, a timely reflection on the guy in line to likely become the Republicans choice to head the U.S. Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee... avowed climate change denier, Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe said

gee, I wonder if this thread will stay on topic or it will devolve to where we see a steady-stream of posts from those intent on conflating weather with climate!

someone actually told me you were this boards moderator... and he/she was serious! Let me ask then... are you a moderator on this board? that's one mega-deflection... just to avoid a couple of questions! hey petro, what's a "Fagro"... I sure hope you're not against the gays... are you? The...

- do you deny global warming? - if you accept global warming what is your interpretation of the principal causal attribution for that global warming? is Greenland your measure of..... global?

enjoy your board... you deserve each other! CU

little man, little mind: ***squawk*** drywall ***squawk***

as reputable reconstructions show; of course, it's a most inconvenient request to ask fake-skepics/deniers to legitimize whatever comparative warming relationship they presume to draw, in terms of warming causes, between the warming of the MWP versus the warming of today's relatively recent...

Climate:Climate in a narrow sense is usually defined as the average weather, or more rigorously, as the statistical description in terms of the mean and variability of relevant quantities over a period of time ranging from months to thousands or millions of years. The classical period for...

.....

for anyone taking exception to my use of the word consensus in regards the earlier reference to the Medieval Warming Period (MWP) being global, you could provide scientifically accepted publication that the MWP was global... you could provide citation to confirm the temperatures of the MWP were...

I think what you'll really find today, for the most part, is you're observing 'emergency lighting'... notwithstanding overall lighting efficiences maximized. Of course, most corporations lease... the bottom-line cost savings in these cases go to the building owners and the management companies...

please provide consensus scientific evidence that the "Medieval Warming Period" was global in affect. In any case, what is your point in comparing Medieval times England's grape growing to today's relatively recent warming? it's clear you don't understand temperature analysis. The ocean...