Search results

spit it out... what is it you want to say? Don't be shy.

given the "authoritative certainty" of the subsidy deniers... will we need more?

from the Office of the Auditor General of Canada: --- 2012 Fall Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development; specific to Chapter 4 of the report: A Study of Federal Support to the Fossil Fuel Sectornews release: Canada has taken positive steps to reduce federal...

and in 2012 Harper Conservatives said they still planned to eliminate what some are claiming... doesn't exist!

interesting in that the 'eliminating fossil-fuel subsidies' theme has been a consistent one for the G20... going back several years now; from this 2009 dated article: G20 agrees on phase-out of fossil fuel subsidies. How odd for Harper to object this go-round... since he/Canada has voted to...

per NOAA: averages & strength classifications based on 30-year data (1981-2010) - average # of Atlantic named storms (1981-2010) => 12.1 - # Atlantic named storms 2013: 14 - # Atlantic named storms 2014: 8 ... with 11 days remaining in the 2014 season

"invisable benevolent harmless gas"??? Uhhh... ok, so you don't accept the greenhouse effect... is that right? I guess there's no point in challenging you to provide evidence of direct and indirect solar influences accounting for the most relatively recent global warming of the past century and...

apparently, you can't handle the truth!

oceans must be cooling??? Why not show something to support your statement... is there a problem for you? Notwithstanding your perpetual miss on the bigger global picture:

nice cherry-pick to the 97/98 El Nino... well done Walter! You were just shown graphic visualized warming (even isolated to surface temperature only... without regard to ocean warming), in a recent post from member 'Tonington'. Did you miss that post? who other than the fringe of the fringe...

no need! You've already established yourself as a genuine denier! Care to fully disclose your denial? Do you deny its warming? If you accept its warming, do you deny mankind is the principal causal tie to that warming (ala anthropogenic sources)? If you accept its warming but deny mankind is the...

bring forward your own source that compares USHCN raw versus homogenized... please, please... make it from schlock-jock Steven Goddard, yes? :lol:

perhaps you should actually read the link from member 'Zipperfish' and come back and advise further, hey! :lol: As for, as you say, "my source being an admitted liar", you'll need to come out of your vague shadows and be just a bit more precise: what source are you speaking to and what admitted...

what would any discussion with a denier be without one adding in a lil' conspiracy theme! Not sure what you mean by "caught molding"... NOAA has fully documented adjustments made and published papers to support the respective methodologies used. you do know that there are other raw sources of...

now I'm aware of Tim Ball dropping his own lawsuit against Dan Johnson/Calgary Herald and I'm aware of the ongoing lawsuit filed by Andrew Weaver against Tim Ball... but I'm not aware of the Mann-Ball lawsuit being dropped... I'm not disputing you, I can't find anything to support that claim...

hey genius! Try following any of the links provided within that article! No linkees workee!!! :lol: Notwithstanding "John O'Sullivan" is nothing more than a hack journalist, one only needs to read his sentence where he states, "World-renowned Canadian climatologist, Dr. Timothy Ball"... to bust...

you say I'm not adding anything new that hasn't already been debunked by you geniuses here. Since I'm only responding to recent posts, then you guys are simply repeating yourselves... why your own repeats then? Are you trying to convince yourselves? :lol: In any case, that's quite the lil' scam...

yup... which is why I questioned Walter about his thread title given his perpetual fixation with weather! Walter... just answer the questions instead of "neg repping"! :toothy10:

I've been updated on this latest wrinkle of your attempted marginalization play. Along with your mind-numbing squawk-fest about "drywall/drywalling", you've been incessantly referring to me as "Fagro". I incorrectly attributed this to your possible homophobia; as I've been advised you believe me...

as do (some) aged octogenarian+ geezer-emeritus physicists