Search results

you know nothing of what you presume to bark about... you never have... you never will. Trust in your coveted British tabloid fake-journalists. It seems member 'Blackleaf' is having trouble providing a/the source to his described "true data"... can ya help the guy out there, hey taxi? Where's...

I note you still won't commit... you still won't state your position on GW/AGW/CC. Yet, you sure have a lot to say otherwise, hey? Just a few posts back you again raised your ire over the denier labeling... and I went down the history path on that with you. I've just given you yet another...

u mad cause you're not getting paid for your drive-by trolling?

oh Locutus, you mad! Locutus the Fisher!

well there we have it! You must just be another right-wing schmuck that thinks edumacation be fer losers! Did a teacher make you sit in the corner once? thank you for your moderation... your most unique brand of moderation!

more exaggeration? You keep repeating this same theme... how desperate are you... wait, how MAD R U? You claimed I had half the board on ignore - to which I asked you if the board had 6 members total? Can ya do the math lil' fella?

oh my! Another lapper and drywall!

and your special parroting C&P way? And your special moderating brand way?

you challenged in terms of "staying anonymous"... I simply inquired as to why your parents would name you so... cause that's your real name, right?

your butt hurtin' too? Again, the OP has an avenue for legitimate discussion... clearly, you've shown you haven't the intellect, or the wherewithal, to recognize that. As the loyal lapdog you are, you play up this "fishin' charade"! So, Locutus the Fisher, laid down a purposeful dedicated thread...

coming from such an esteemed moderator as yourself, that really means a lot to me! Ya think? Clearly you're "MAD BRO" in continually having your bullshyte C&P denier crapola shown for what it is. You've clearly no game yourself... other than your "C&P Run & Gun" show, you've never, as I've read...

well what else has Locutus got! He clearly can't articulate a single thought of his own... that is clearly why his forte is blindly linking to C&P articles, typically sourced from his stable of go-to denier blogs (oh... and twitter feeds!) yet again, there is an avenue for legitimate discussion...

so says your tabloid "journalist" Delingpole and the 'computer programmer' he draws reference from. If you actually follow the topic it seems your 'computer programmer' relents and agrees that post-1950 there is little adjustment of consequence between the raw and the homogenized data... that...

like I said, your linked OP has an avenue for legitimate discussion; however it takes an interpretation of the originating author's intent in regards today's relatively recent warming, but more pointedly, an interpretation of your intent in posting yet another of your C&P gems! Since you never...

do you have a decipher on how to interpret Locutus' posts?... since all his posts are simply direct verbatim C&P quotes, where he adds nothing subject related of his own commentary, what's the clue to ascertain when member Locutus "means it" and when he's "just fishing"? I mean, you said the...

back when the idiot, non-scientist, denier blogger extraordinaire, Tony Willard Watts, was on his (failed) campaign to disprove the surface temperature record datasets, when he had the balls to literally accuse NOAA of fraud, several similar type critiques (as Cowtan shows in the video) were...

oh wait... do you mean member Locutus went to the trouble in creating a whole separate thread for his linked reference... where he refuses to state what point(s) he intended to make with his C&P... and the best you can come up with in your declared "obviousness", is that his refusal comes down...

why did your parents name you "skookumchuck"?

member Blackleaf has repeatedly quoted that same "fake-journalist" Booker series of articles. I actually bothered to respond to him with the following vid from Kevin Cowtan that debunks the "Homewood" nonsense that Booker parrots. Of course member Blackleaf completely ignored it! Again, that...

please provide a/your source for your labelled "true data".