Search results

thank you for your moderation. pretty funny. :lol:

no worries, Colpy... Pachauri isn't a scientist; he's a management suit. I appreciate you deniers have trouble making that distinction to actual legitimate scientists. In any case, there has already been commentary in this thread that reflects upon your earlier 'rush to judgement' before any...

clearly... I own you! You're fixated with me... I'm in your head! Thread after thread, you take your pissant juvenile shots at me and your lapping posse just... laps it up (well, I presume that's what your posse is up to... since I have them ON IGNORE!). Cause it's really all you've got to...

I can't read you poor lil' petros! Please don't hurt yourself with all your marginalization attempts! I might be off for a few days... take care of the board... you live on!

clearly... I own you! You're fixated with me... I'm in your head! Thread after thread, you take your pissant juvenile shots at me and you/your posse have a grand yukfest... (well, I presume that's what your posse is up to... since I have them ON IGNORE!). Cause it's really all you've got to...

read your post azzhole... you take a shot. And, oh my... you sure don't like return fire! :mrgreen: yes, you are! But don't let that get in the way of your described "truth-seeking"! Add that to your nonsense over that wiki page and in just a few short posts you clearly showed your drama...

another couple of sorry cases I own... so preoccupied with the waldo; forever attempting to marginalize the waldo! :mrgreen: Guys, guys, move along now; I could care less! You're nothing to me but comic relief. drama queen! On the broader level, peer-review/response works quite well. Of...

that's quite the moderator's role you're performing here! :mrgreen: You sure are quite preoccupied with your attempts to prod, to goad me! I am quite content and most satisfied to realize I own your azz and you are my little beeatch! considering you're "undecided and on the fence"... that's...

again, this page is strictly informative... what's to question, what's to dispute? What on this page are you having such difficulty with? For someone, YOU, who knew nothing of peer-review, you're sure quick to leap and, apparently, question/dispute a most basic information page on Journal...

the page is strictly informative; there's really nothing there for you, or anyone, to question/dispute. But, uhhh... keep up your barking charade!

there's really no wedge here to support your play... please try again/try harder! Here: Journal Ranking... try to educate yourself - you're welcome!

didn't you say you were undecided... on the fence? :mrgreen: Of course, peer-review is the standard; however, the full cycle includes peer-response. And, of course, the particular journal being targeted... and the journal rating is of significance. "Some number" of skeptic papers get shopped...

denier talking point: no "skeptical" papers can get published... except when they do! :mrgreen:

for a claimed "earth-sciences" scientist, it is very odd that the guy doesn't know how peer-review works... hello, peer-response... as in response, if the paper directly challenges (another paper's findings) and/or is viewed significant enough for other scientists to bother with! But hey now, I...

again - listen to Teddy

at all? Really? Member Tonington just spoke of the nonsensical simple one-model paper Soon co-authored with wing-nut Monckton. Whether it's back to his earlier paleo related writings... or polar bears, etc., it seems it always glaringly comes back to "Willie and the Sun": It’s the Sun...

is that from the same Heartland Institute "expert", Alan Caruba? Uhhh... the founder of the "National Anxiety Center"? Oh my!

Is Climate Change To Blame For The Northeast Snow Storm? ... what did Trenberth actually say? Kevin Trenberth, a senior scientist in the climate analysis section at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, said that in winter, temperatures are generally colder on land than over the...

as you're aware, all data, all methodologies, all computing processes, used by the organizations in providing surface temperature datasets are in the public domain. Anyone can review, create and check the end results... and, as I expect you're also aware, that's exactly what over a dozen+...

was that so hard for you to write? How many times did you avoid the repeated requests for you to state your position... if you don't have one, you say so! Is that so difficult for you? Of course, based on some of what you've written I'd suggest you might want to reevaluate your now claimed...