Search results

speaking of low-hanging fruit (YOU) sucking up member Locutus' drivel... the phrase the C&P wizard uses has no bearing on the article. Oh wait, correction... apparently, there is some correlation to be had, at least with respect to Republicans! :mrgreen: Well done taxi, well done!

comment? Rebuttal? Rebuttal to what? Ya sees, I've challenged the stalking fake-moderator to splain it! You know, to actually go beyond his C&P wizardry and actually state what the article's point(s) is/are. Of course, the stalking fake-moderator can't do that... can't rise above his C&P...

oh Locutus, why I oughta..... oh wait, what's this stated in the article:"It needs to be emphasised that these are not raw temperatures, but have been carefully homogenised and adjusted where necessary, to account for station moves and equipment changes." manipulated data!!! Fudged data...

Fox News... from the JoNova denier blog!!! Oh Locutus... yer so funny!

hey Locutus... there doesn't seem to be any link to that "German analysis"??? Is there a study somewhere... is there even a link to... somewhere? Somewhere in Germany perhaps... albeit it's a big country! :mrgreen:

whaaa, taxi!!!! That talking point is so busted! Ya see... that was the Davos World Economic Forum... there were very few presentations that had any bearing/relationship to your arch-nemisis, GW/AGW/CC! Poor taxi - another talking point busted!

perfect! Republican doofuses (doofi?) relying on the already debunked horseshyte that UK Telegraph "fake-journalist" Booker, trotted out a few backs... and Locutus, your linked article throws in quotes from your regular go-to charlatan guy, "Steven Goddard", and all is primed to have that...

it seems your only replies are along the lines of, "u mad?", "look who's mad", "wow, butt hurt", "why so mad bro"... c'mon, Locutus - up your game man! :mrgreen: but really, c'mon... you thought the linked reference and quote sooooooooo significant, you created a whole new thread for it! What...

is that member Locutus' point with his C&P reference? If only he would... if only he could... speak for himself.

Locutus, beyond your C&P... you've not added even a single word of your own. Is there a summary concluding point(s) you would like to make concerning your C&P linked reference?

you're quite confused Locutazz! Just a few posts back you said, "with half this place on ignore you're basically talking to yourself and the janitor." Since I have 3 members on IGNORE, I asked, "are there only 6 members here, Locutus?" Are you typically prone to this level of exaggeration...

quit making shyte up! you repeatedly refused to state your understanding of the consensus, to provide your interpretation of what the consensus meant to you. Of course you refused, because you didn't have a clue what the actual consensus was... which didn't stop you from calling bullshyte...

actually.... as only the fringe of the fringe question the Greenhouse Effect, Tony Willard Watts, was pressured into withdrawing the WTFIUWT keys to some of the more prolific nutters who deny the Greenhouse Effect. However... Tony Willard Watts has some months back loosened his "standards" to...

thank you for your continued Locutus Brand™ moderation. Also... sorry to have burst your previous post's bubble! :mrgreen: You still mad, stalker?

these deniers are just soooo funny! In that regard, deniers purposely focus on surface temperature to the absolute exclusion of ocean warming. Go figure! The slowdown in the rate of surface temperature warming is well understood; however, uncertainty exists as to the actual degree of that...

Arctic warming in ERA-Interim reaffirms Cowtan & Way 2014The new estimate for the near surface reported by Cowtan and Way in 2014 agrees reasonably well with the ERA-Interim reanalysis for this region. Both provide global averages with a little more warming over recent years than indicated by...

what hood are you an adult in? Perhaps Locutus can tell us! :mrgreen: You're probably the last person on this board to call out anyone's posting... hey lil' buddy! You know, your forevah "I don't have to support nuthin... I won't reinvent the wheel for you... it's all been said in previous CC...

are you the dancingMan's agent? Again, thank you for your Locutus Brand™ of moderation says you... the guy whose complete act is to prowl denier blogs, come back with your C&P gems... and not say a single damn word of your own! You, the guy who actually believes charlatans like bloggers...

buddy, you didn't have a clue what the consensus was... yet you called bullshyte out of the chute! I just put together a fairly detailed post that speaks to what the consensus actually is. Somehow... you're prepared to gloss right over that and reply like you've just done. Is that your, as you...

Walter, your regular confirmation bias is no surprise... why not, instead, surprise with your alternate prioritized important list.