Search results

this is a somewhat sciency technical related thread... or at least it can be at times. Did you take a wrong turn?

nah, you're neutered now... and your "I've changed nothing" clearly speaks to your Jimmies being rustled! Clearly, you've had your peepee wacked! No need for you to attempt to save face here Locutus. Everyone recognizes your ongoing charade. you keep talking about these so-called "stronger...

and here I was about to comment about the now neutered Locutus! Good times... the forum thanks you. And all it took was for another member to strike up a couple of threads on the boards lacking/failed moderation and the pointedly targeted big-time failures of one particular moderator.

Clearly... the funding of testimony given by academics has value... but to who? Those seven individuals have been on the U.S. Republicans regular go-to list for years, to give testimony before an assortment of U.S. Congressional Committees. The U.S. politician (Democratic) has stated: "I want...

interesting how your go-to denier blogger "Goddard' elevates that "article" that states "certain scientists", that states "proposal"... to a statement that "NAS wanted to evacuate millions"! Oh my, Locutus! :mrgreen: of course, it's always a ready-hand denier go-to: the media driven 70s global...

Chart of the temperature anomalies for 1950-2014, also showing the phase of the El Niño-La Niña cycle. (Image Credit: NASA/GSFC/Earth Observatory, NASA/GISS)

c'mon taxi... it's the same graph source as put forward by the prior post... the post I was responding to! Taxi, why didn't you drop your one-liner drive-by turd against that post, hey? :mrgreen:

such a sad lil' facker you are! I'll check in once in a while here... sometimes 2 or 3 times per day... sometimes never in a day. But every time I drop in... you're here! You live here... you literally live on this board. Such a sad lil' reflection on your life, hey Locutus! But hey, one would...

since his post was in response to yours... this following post... perhaps you should elaborate on what you meant.

a perfect reflection on what's allowed to perpetuate on this board... with active moderator participation.

thank you for your moderation, your attempts to inspire respect between members, and your efforts to bring forward meaningful board discussion!

sure, sure... your blog reference is noted: is there something you'd like to say about it? :mrgreen:

sure, sure... I gave you a 3-month dose of reality... which is a follow-up on the earlier graphic (that you ignored) that showed the east influenced by the dropping jet-stream with warm and record warm temperatures throughout the west. Of course you would ignore that. But hey Locutus, what's...

of course, Colpy... you need to be careful here. Last time you ventured forward you blew up good, you blew up real good. Imagine, a guy like you Colpy... so blowhardy and blustering... and it came to light that you actually thought ocean temperature was reflected within the global surface...

stay firm and resolute with your favoured denier bloggers! :mrgreen: Apparently... your kind of preferred facts - go figure!

taxi... there are weather models... and there are climate models! :mrgreen: You funny, taxi!

jeezaz Locutus, your post gives the impression of a "wholesale" change/adjustment concern raised by your linked blogger(s)... surely you wouldn't have crafted your post in such an all-encompassing way instead of properly stating the raised concern was with respect to Iceland (and 8 stations...

that ship sailed long ago! In spite of the CC board rules against insulting fellow members, in spite of no active moderation of that related rule, in spite of a so-called moderator that actively insults and encourages insults, insulting is the norm here and in this regard, I simply responding in...