Search results

I'd ask what the fuck you're on about now, but I find I really don't care.

Sorry, didn't see the question. No, of course not. One can serve many ways. Being educated, like knowing the difference between "then" and "than," makes one's contribution more valuable.

Yes, nobody ever had it as tough as you. Whiny punk.

Vague threats. What's next? Gonna threaten "appropriate measures?"

Very proper. I called the King of the Chimps, and he accepted your gracious apology.

Dumb and Dumber.

Fred and Ginger.

Yep, that's why I said "wingnuts" instead of left or right wingnuts. As I've said, the political spectrum ain't a line, it's a horseshoe, with the extreme ends much closer to each other than to the middle.

OK, the "chimp" comment was pretty harsh. What did chimps ever do to you?

Poor you. Don't understand the difference between the right to contribute and the quality of contribution.

Major True Dope coiffure change in 3. . . 2. . . 1. . .

Yes, you pissing and moaning on the internet is SO MUCH GREATER a contribution to Canada that his 35 years in SAR!

They're GRRRRREAT!

"The Almighty says to quit changin' the subject and answer the fockin' question." --Stephen, Braveheart

I question whether a "blockade" is illegal. As I asked and was not answered before, is there a criminal statute forbidding "blockade," or does it come under some weak tea like "obstructing a public right of way?"

Artistic Metaphor of the Typical "Debate" on CanCon. . .

Yeah, fits right in hereabouts, don't he?

I'm not sure you were responding to my question, but if so, fail.

Now THAT's activism!

What law, specifically, is being broken? Betcha it comes down to a minor misdemeanor like "obstructing a public right-of-way."