Search results

So. . . whimpering about how hard-done-by are by "unlikely" policies? OK, have fun.

I'm proto-omni-quasi-cis-anti-macro-intra-post-sub-auto-circum-ana-contra-antesexual.

Daily practice, I figure.

Would you like us to send the Marines? They cleaned up Tripoli once, they can do it again. From the halls of Montezuma To the shores of Tripoli We will fight our country's battles In the air, on land and sea First to fight for right and freedom And to keep our honor clean We are proud to claim...

I have no doubt you were terrified.

Actually, I asked Boomster. Won't make that mistake again, but I concede the point. You win that round. I favor free (regulated lightly if at all) trade in non-essentials, and mid-level regulation of trade in essentials. Preferably by a government agency with limited tenure for employees and...

So. . . about 15% of Chicken Little level. Lower than '73-'74 and '79-'81. Run and hide! They're destroying Amer. . . um. . . Canada!

I don't believe your glorious leader. If you do, you're stupid. All cars sold since, what, 1996, are required to run on unleaded gas. Was that a violations of your precious retarded notion of your rights?

Well, I guess we could ask him to articulate the scientific basis for his policy, then take a picture and put in the dictionary next to "gobsmacked." Or maybe next to "duh." Course, there's always the risk he'll invoke the Emergencies Act if we do that. (Does Canada have strict...

What would you propose? Forbidding the rich from leaving Canada for medical services? Cuz that ain't fascist or nothing.

Not necessarily, but in the case of rightards who think any variation on what the world was like back when is an attack on everything that's right and decent. . . This is real simple. Don't like electric cars? Don't buy one. Think you can get your head around that? I seriously thought of...

Concluding, but I don't expect you to understand the difference. Feel free to continue with your shopworn pun.

Well, your emotional hatred of electric cars has to come from something.

But. . . but. . . Gawd!

In Maryland the law says that if a woman allows penetration, the man is entitled to continue to ejaculation. And Maryland is considered a progressive state. Here's what perplexes me about Jin's position. He would allow abortion if the foetus was conceived in rape or there was a significant...

So. . . what proof would you require of a woman that she was raped before you would graciously allow her to have an abortion? Would it be the old standard that if a woman couldn't show evidence that she'd been beaten, she was deemed to have consented because she didn't fight hard enough?

What makes you think I give a damn less about electric cars? I take it from your tone that you like pollution and want to see more of it?

What "liberals" would that be? The judge? Reuters? Or just anybody who doesn't dream about being ass-rammed by Elon Schmuck?

Most valuable thing I've read on this board today.

Of course. He's a hard-core conservative Republican with BAs in History and English from the University of Kansas!