Search results

So. . . you think Jan 6 was an "ordinary tourist visit" where they engaged in "legitimate political discourse?" Figures.

Wutabout wutabout wutabout. Or is this another one of your arguments that because police did not arrest the rioters (they arrested at least 17,000, but that fact doesn't fit your narrative), they are therefore forbidden to ever arrest rioters again?

Or we could storm the Capitol and enforce Trump's demand that he be "declared" president. But "we" already got our free shot, and I expect the Capitol cops, DC Metro, and the National Guard won't be in such a tolerant mood this time.

You've already expressed your unshakable conviction that this cannot be legitimately prosecuted, so what's the point in explaining anything to you?

He hasn't been charged yet. There are many possibilities.

Get Pete Poo-lover in office, and Happy Days Are Here Again!

Like they were under Eisenhower and Diefenbaker!

"Ah-OOOOO!" --Warren Zevon

The Constitution says nothing at all about marriage or childbearing. Not in the Articles, not in the Amendments. You've never read the four-page document you're making pronouncements about.

Correct. "Influence." A couple of percent either way. And should do whatever it can. And True Dope isn't doing very well, probably through ignorance of the levers and tools he does have and indifference to the economy in his priority list. But I get sick of whimpering morons who blame ONE...

I didn't say it did. Y'know, when you dream up a statement, ascribe it to me, then argue against it, you're really just talking to yourself.

The word "fundamental" (note spelling) is not contained in the Constitution. You can hardly quibble over whether a right is "fundamental" under the Constitution if the Constitution makes no distinction. Why are the rights to marry and to have children "fundamental Constitutional rights?" The...

Not really. The obvious answer is "doctors don't control when we get sick." But you seem to think Presidents and PMs do control the economy.

"CANDLE" in the wind? Oh, NOW it all makes sense. I heard "Canada in the the wind," and always wondered "What the fuck is he singing about? Is he comparing Diana to Canada?"

Wrong again. The Ninth Amendment states “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” So, if the people have only the rights stated in the Constitution, why does the Constitution itself acknowledge the...

OK, you don't understand quotation marks either. Here's the key question, Skippy. If a President or PM can control the economy, why do we ever have downturns? Surely no President or PM is dumb enough to think that would get her or him re-elected (though Trump and True Dope come close).

States are allowed to pass laws that grant MORE rights than the Constitution, but never LESS rights. For example, the city of Cincinnati, Ohio, has a civil-rights ordinance that forbids discrimination based on "Appalachian heritage," i.e., hillbillies from western Kentucky. The city can do...

Serious question. I know you'd blame a rainy day on True Dope, but do you really think he controls the economy? I mean, when you're not hissing "Curssssse the Trudeauses! We hates them forever, precioussss!"

Atlantis did.

Of course you can. Some things are most appropriately done by the states. Speed limits. Crimes that only exist in one state (cutting a wild saguaro is illegal. Saguaro only grow wild in Arizona). Laws on waterways contained in a single state. Choice of penalties for crimes. Fundamental...