Search results

The word is "precedent." Not as funny as "correcting" something from wrong. . . to wrong.

Good article. Gotta explain it to the Real Americans. Not that they'll believe you, mind.

Yep. And have no fear, the conjobs will claim every single liberal in North America agrees completely. And with the next breath deny that conservatives disagree with the insane mutterings of their more extreme end of the spectrum.

Easier once you get your head around the fact that knowledge is not good or evil. It just is.

Reminds me of Desiderata. People were saying it was found in an ancient tomb, that it was found in a church and dated to the 1600s, blah blah blah. It was written by Max Ehrmann of Terra Haute, Indiana, and copyrighted in 1927.

Argument by anecdote in 3. . . 2. . . 1. . .

Should I call the WAAAAAHmbulance?

Rolling Thunder!

In Prince Georges County, Maryland, a high-school teacher has been cleared of criminal charges for "inadvertently" sending explicit photos to students. The sex of the teacher was not specified, but if the teacher hasn't been fired, I think student comments and blatant "checking him/her out"...

Glad you're back. I like your note. It stayed for five years for a reason.

It's the gift that keeps on giving!

It's CRT, I tells ya! CRT!

Seven. Lisa Marie Presley.

Um. . . you gotta read the article. HOW DO THE TWO CASES DIFFER? Legal experts say there are stark contrasts between the two cases. In Trump's case, the National Archives tried for more than a year after Trump left office to retrieve all of the records he retained, without success. When Trump...

What, no Incendiary Devices? I think a lot of young persons with chromosomes would love being a member of the "Firebombs."

Well, when ya brag about killing people, there's gonna be some pushback.

Sorry, Serryah, but I have to side with the Conjobs on this one. For better or for worse, we leave treatment options up to the doctor/therapist/counsellor/whatever you want to call them precisely because it's an art, not a science. We trust, having no choice, that the practitioner will do...

Nope. Views are prejudice. Actions are discrimination. No, yes. Your bills are stupid and overbroad. As a lawyer, I approve! Call 'em the Lawyers' Full Employment Acts of 2023.

We forbid discrimination based on race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, sexuality. . . or competence. Kidding. My proposed Twenty-Eighth Amendment to the Constitution would read "(1) Discrimination on the basis of any factor irrelevant or only minimally relevant to the area in...

Leads to the question. . . is "compensatory discrimination" the right answer for past discrimination (which never happened, of course)? My answer is no, it's not worth giving the supremacists the fodder for their terrified whining. Rather, strict and criminal enforcement of discrimination...