Search results

Serious question. . . when was "the nation" not divided? Did y'all ever have a unity government, or a party with 80+% of the seats in Parliament? Or a greater color mix amongst ridings geographically?

Not that you're a bigot or nothin'.

It is inconceivable based on an overwhelming number of whiny little assholes on the internet that anything will ever serve as the last word.

I believe we have a new definition of "chutzpah." And "litigious."

Imagine my shock when I found they're all PCs.

Works for me. Do whatever somebody phoning in a bomb threat demands. For the children!

What was convenient shorthand is, sadly, now wielded as a rhetorical weapon by people who don't know the difference between semantics and facts. Of course not. And if intelligence ever finds out, it's unlikely they'll tell me and thee.

So, suddenly we trust the Biden government?

Yep, good times down home, sittin' on the porch watchin' Grampaw get crazier and crazier.

Give him time, he's old. And never was all that bright to begin with.

It's OK, Blackie. To paraphrase John Milton "They also serve who only kneel and suck."

Now that they let gays in the Army, they can do good service on their knees.

Well, Brexiteers always were a gutless bunch.

There also is no "Law of Gravity." There is an equation that has worked in all cases in which it has been tried, after apparent exceptions have been explained by intervening forces. It remains good until the day it no longer describes observed phenomena, just as the Newtonian "Laws" of motion...

Y'all really should re-elect Harper.

List of things y'all hate.

Both. It seems fairly obvious to me that the acquisition of new information causes re-evaluation of the information previously in hand in light of the new information.

Yes. The process of investigation usually leads to the acquisition of more information. That's kinda why we do it.

I'm not sure "there's no evidence of an accidental or deliberate release of biological experiments" constitutes "steering."