Search results

Brian Lilley thinks 29 May to the following 24 March is a year? What a stupid fellow! Or does he think the clock started ticking when the Americans signed it, and the Canadian signature was irrelevant? He's a lot closer on that.

This has nothing to do with the Israel/Palestinian problem. This is an attempted political takeover of the judicial system. It will affect Israeli Jews as much as Palestinians. Would you like True Dope to be in command of the Canadian judiciary?

Apparently there's some perception that the "drag story hours" are all about reading books about sex. . .

Why, this is an OUTRAGE! They should tax baby formula, diapers, and menstrual hygiene products, not essentials!

Can't trust the slanty-eyed bastards.

You really don't know what an oxymoron is.

Awww. . . they was jist funnin'.

Quit showing your dick to the customs agents! They didn't even ask!

Why? The obvious answer will be that we need safe, clean, efficient sulfur dioxide. And lead, of course.

Aww! I LIKE my chocolate with heavy metals!

Cowards woulda thrown in the towel after Pearl Harbor. Or the Blitz.

Because they're people. I don't like to comment on Canadian politics much, but this just people being people. When one of usuns does something wrong, it's forgivable, or at least understandable. Maybe "unfortunate." When one of themmuns does the same thing, it not only calls for crucifixion...

Hate and anger are masking emotions for fear. The reason it's so hard to calm anger and soothe hate is that those feeling them will deny them, just as they're already denying they're afraid.

She's probably off someplace communing with Nature.

Confirmation bias.

Shocking news! A new force has been identified as interfering in Canadian elections. . . Canadians!

It's OK, harry. The scary gays aren't going to do things to your butt.

Blaming whatever on "them damn foreigners" is the oldest trick in the political book. Works especially well when "them damn foreigners" are Yanks.

Well, that was the rule in the U.S. from 1609-1964. At least two Republican senators are on record wanting to go back to that, in the name of "freedom of association."

Well, of course not there. I meant at work. But you can laugh at her, too. Just think long and hard on what it's gonna cost ya. . .