Search results

The old saying is "Generals are always preparing to fight the last war."

"Not if they're fags." --James Remar as Ajax, The Warriors

Interesting that the conservative consensus seems to be "sexual predators should only target boys." In a nutshell.

Flip it. If he was a gangster who threatened bystanders with a gun while his buddy murdered someone, would that be "crowd control?" Or would it be "accessory to murder?"

So which is it? I know, I know, to Conservatives it's both. He knew and he didn't know.

I bow to your extensive, fascinated study of gender reassignment.

An example would be how you call people child molesters and "groomers," then get your panties in a knot when they call you homophobic bigots.

How is ol' Wil these days?

Probably need it what with all them CommieNaziTransGayLibGROOMERS! hurting your feels.

Up to the owner of the cafeteria.

Yup. We can quit wasting all this valuable media time on ordinary stuff like this and focus on how True Dope and Sleepy Joe have Destroyed Americanaduh and only Trump can save us! (Along with the Boy Wonder, Pete Poo-lover, of course.)

True. So I guess it's OK then.

That'd be cuz yer ignert.

Tissue?

This is worse than Torchy.

Right. "Targetting" is only a crime if it's "targetting" someone with something illegal. The classic movie-Mafia threat "Nice place you have here. Be a shame if something. . . happened to it" was concocted because, without more, it's not a criminal threat.

I don't know, and the story doesn't say. Whether or not the diplomat had immunity is beside the point. Even if he did, he could have been expelled. But "threats" and "intimidation" covers a lot of ground, some illegal, some not. The whole problem with this alleged Chinese interference is...

Cue creepy music. . .

That is it. Unless you are under threat of loss of life, liberty, or property, you're just whining. Like the people who exercise their "freedom of speech," and then pout when somebody else exercises their equal freedom of speech to call them fucktards.

Of course it is. Difference is that "shady and unethical" is another term for "Tuesday" in Washington, and I strongly doubt it's any different in Ottawa (or any other capital). Illegal's a whole 'nother smoke, and invokes a different set of rules.