Omnibus Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell
- Thread starter Tecumsehsbones
- Start date
The only dot is nobody will stand for their crimes.
Well, if that’s the case, then exposing the ones protecting them for what they actually are doing…at least that’s something. Can’t see that happening either but…
On the evidence presented. Gawd sent bears to rip apart 42 kids because they made fun of Gawd's prophet.
How many people has Satan gruesomely murdered for teasing one of his employees?
In case your wondering, it's 2 Kings, 23-24.
How many people has Satan gruesomely murdered for teasing one of his employees?
In case your wondering, it's 2 Kings, 23-24.
Amanda Ungaro - Wikipedia
Crockett says Oversights Democrats will move to hold Bondi in contempt — The Hill
Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) said Tuesday that Democrats will move to hold former Attorney General Pam Bondi in contempt for failing to appear for a deposition as part of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s Jeffrey Epstein probe.
2 GOP backers of Bondi subpoena signal resistance to contempt push — The Hill
Two House Republicans who backed the subpoena of former Attorney General Pam Bondi expressed resistance to joining Democrats in seeking to hold her in contempt after the Justice Department said she would not appear for a scheduled deposition.
Live updates: Eric Swalwell under criminal investigation after new accuser speaks out; Democrats threaten to hold Pam Bondi in contempt of Congress — NBC News
Both Swalwell and embattled Rep. Tony Gonzales resigned from Congress today, pre-empting a push by their House colleagues to expel them from office.
Pam Bondi - Wikipedia
So now “former” (as of 12 days ago) attorney general Pam Bondi could be charged with contempt of Congress after failing to appear for a scheduled deposition for her testimony in a long-running investigation into the federal government’s handling of investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.
But last week, the Department of Justice claimed the subpoena “no longer applies.” If so, that’s awfully convenient.
Rep. Robert Garcia, the committee’s top Democrat, said in a statement Tuesday that the (as of 12 days ago) former attorney general “is evading a lawful congressional subpoena” by refusing to testify about the Epstein files “and the White House cover-up.”
“This subpoena applies to her regardless of her title,” he said. “She must appear before the committee, and if she continues to ignore the law, Oversight Democrats will move forward with contempt proceedings immediately. We will fight until there is true accountability and justice.”
Pam Bondi could be held in contempt after failing to show up for Epstein testimony
Former attorney general is ‘evading a lawful congressional subpoena,’ according to top Democrat on House Oversight Committee
www.independent.co.uk
A federal judge dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over a report about a 50th birthday card he “allegedly” sent to Jeffrey Epstein.
apple.news
First lady Melania Trump gave a bewildering April 9 brief speech from the White House, which nobody asked for or was expecting, in which she complained about "false smears" connecting her with Epstein, despite plenty of photographs that have circulated for years that show her and her husband quite cozy with the sex offender.
Former Attorney General Pam Bondi, who did more than anyone in the Trump administration to make the Epstein files a political minefield, kept the scandal's renewed momentum going by refusing to comply with a lawfully issued subpoena from the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which wanted to question her about the files.
And then acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, picking up right where Bondi left off before Trump fired her on April 2 for this mess, appeared on Fox News on April 14 with a message that amounted to: The Department of Justice has provided an unfettered view … to everything we want you to see in the Epstein files, and now this is over?
In his interview, the acting attorney general insisted that the DOJ reviewed 6 million (so roughly double what has actually been released) documents and released "anything associated with the Epstein files.”
A bipartisan movement in Congress, driven specifically by the DOJ's lack of transparency in the Epstein files, overwhelmingly passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November. Trump, who fought to stop that legislation, grudgingly signed it into law.
The DOJ didn't meet the 30-day deadline to release all of the Epstein files. And the two key sponsors of the legislation, Republican U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna of California, told me the DOJ still hasn't complied with the law.
Blanche told Fox News that any member of Congress can come to the DOJ and inspect the Epstein files in unredacted format. But here's what Blanche didn't say: He's making the call on what is and is not an Epstein file, and what Congress can and cannot see.
Bondi claimed she could skip the House Oversight Committee subpoena because she's no longer attorney general. But a bipartisan mix of committee members still want to hear from Bondi, and a spokesperson for the committee said it would work to reschedule her testimony.
It's no coincidence that Trump fired Bondi just before she's supposed to testify. He didn't want us to hear what she would say. So it's “likely”
Bondi will resist complying with her subpoena.
apple.news
Trump loses his Epstein case, Dems score another court win — MS NOW
A federal judge dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over a report about a 50th birthday card he allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein. Plus, New York Attorney General Letitia James on the verdict against Ticketmaster and Live Nation. (The Beat's...
Former Attorney General Pam Bondi, who did more than anyone in the Trump administration to make the Epstein files a political minefield, kept the scandal's renewed momentum going by refusing to comply with a lawfully issued subpoena from the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which wanted to question her about the files.
And then acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, picking up right where Bondi left off before Trump fired her on April 2 for this mess, appeared on Fox News on April 14 with a message that amounted to: The Department of Justice has provided an unfettered view … to everything we want you to see in the Epstein files, and now this is over?
In his interview, the acting attorney general insisted that the DOJ reviewed 6 million (so roughly double what has actually been released) documents and released "anything associated with the Epstein files.”
A bipartisan movement in Congress, driven specifically by the DOJ's lack of transparency in the Epstein files, overwhelmingly passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November. Trump, who fought to stop that legislation, grudgingly signed it into law.
The DOJ didn't meet the 30-day deadline to release all of the Epstein files. And the two key sponsors of the legislation, Republican U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna of California, told me the DOJ still hasn't complied with the law.
Blanche told Fox News that any member of Congress can come to the DOJ and inspect the Epstein files in unredacted format. But here's what Blanche didn't say: He's making the call on what is and is not an Epstein file, and what Congress can and cannot see.
Bondi claimed she could skip the House Oversight Committee subpoena because she's no longer attorney general. But a bipartisan mix of committee members still want to hear from Bondi, and a spokesperson for the committee said it would work to reschedule her testimony.
It's no coincidence that Trump fired Bondi just before she's supposed to testify. He didn't want us to hear what she would say. So it's “likely”
Bondi will resist complying with her subpoena.Opinion | Bondi may be out, but DOJ's Epstein files cover-up remains | Opinion — USA TODAY
Hmm, a drawn-out fight about transparency and the Epstein files in the lead-up to the midterms. What could go wrong for Republicans there?
So who is the new cult leader?A federal judge dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over a report about a 50th birthday card he “allegedly” sent to Jeffrey Epstein.
First lady Melania Trump gave a bewildering April 9 brief speech from the White House, which nobody asked for or was expecting, in which she complained about "false smears" connecting her with Epstein, despite plenty of photographs that have circulated for years that show her and her husband quite cozy with the sex offender.Trump loses his Epstein case, Dems score another court win — MS NOW
A federal judge dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over a report about a 50th birthday card he allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein. Plus, New York Attorney General Letitia James on the verdict against Ticketmaster and Live Nation. (The Beat's...
View attachment 34131
Former Attorney General Pam Bondi, who did more than anyone in the Trump administration to make the Epstein files a political minefield, kept the scandal's renewed momentum going by refusing to comply with a lawfully issued subpoena from the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which wanted to question her about the files.
And then acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, picking up right where Bondi left off before Trump fired her on April 2 for this mess, appeared on Fox News on April 14 with a message that amounted to: The Department of Justice has provided an unfettered view … to everything we want you to see in the Epstein files, and now this is over?
In his interview, the acting attorney general insisted that the DOJ reviewed 6 million (so roughly double what has actually been released) documents and released "anything associated with the Epstein files.”
A bipartisan movement in Congress, driven specifically by the DOJ's lack of transparency in the Epstein files, overwhelmingly passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November. Trump, who fought to stop that legislation, grudgingly signed it into law.
The DOJ didn't meet the 30-day deadline to release all of the Epstein files. And the two key sponsors of the legislation, Republican U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna of California, told me the DOJ still hasn't complied with the law.
Blanche told Fox News that any member of Congress can come to the DOJ and inspect the Epstein files in unredacted format. But here's what Blanche didn't say: He's making the call on what is and is not an Epstein file, and what Congress can and cannot see.
Bondi claimed she could skip the House Oversight Committee subpoena because she's no longer attorney general. But a bipartisan mix of committee members still want to hear from Bondi, and a spokesperson for the committee said it would work to reschedule her testimony.
It's no coincidence that Trump fired Bondi just before she's supposed to testify. He didn't want us to hear what she would say. So it's “likely”
Opinion | Bondi may be out, but DOJ's Epstein files cover-up remains | Opinion — USA TODAY
Hmm, a drawn-out fight about transparency and the Epstein files in the lead-up to the midterms. What could go wrong for Republicans there?
A pardon for sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell? Why?
Her entire life has been a series of rescues by wealthy and powerful men
Author of the article:Brad Hunter
Published Apr 24, 2026 • Last updated 21 hours ago • 3 minute read
Ghislaine Maxwell
SHE LOOKS UNDERAGE! This undated photo released by the U.S. Department of Justice shows Ghislaine Maxwell. Photo by Uncredited /AP
Socialite turned sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has been a spoiled brat her entire life.
The very embodiment of the poor little rich girl.
The daughter of disgraced publishing mogul Robert Maxwell, the 64-year-old one-time paramour of billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein has been offered plenty of chances to do the right thing.
Maxwell has repeatedly refused.
(FILES) This undated photo provided by the US Justice Department on December 19, 2025 shows Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy US financier who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking underage girls, and his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell aboard a jet. Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell will be questioned behind closed doors by the US Congress on February 9, 2026, though she's expected to invoke her right to not answer questions.
(FILES) This undated photo provided by the US Justice Department on December 19, 2025 shows Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy US financier who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking underage girls, and his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell aboard a jet. Jeffrey Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell will be questioned behind closed doors by the US Congress on February 9, 2026, though she’s expected to invoke her right to not answer questions. Photo by HANDOUT /AFP
Now serving a 20-year jolt in a Texas Club Fed, even after her December 2021 conviction and the lurid allegations that emerged from the sex trafficking trial, she remains unbowed.
Her entire life has been a series of rescues by wealthy and powerful men. First, it was her father, then Epstein, her short-lived marriage to a fabulously rich hubby, and now, she’s looking to U.S. President Donald Trump.
‘She is an evil predator’
Author Barry Levine, who wrote The Spider: Inside the Tangled Web of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, could not withhold his contempt for Maxwell when we spoke last October.
“She is an evil, evil predator,” Levine said. “She told her friends that ‘these girls are nothing but trash.’ She was the one who recruited the girls, groomed them, and promised their parents they would get music lessons, voice lessons and acting lessons. The girls were being thrown to wolves.”
Some of the names entangled in the sick web of the late Jeffrey Epstein.
Some of the names entangled in the sick web of the late Jeffrey Epstein. Donald Trump, Bill Clinton and Brett Ratner have not been accused of any wrongdoing and have denied any wrongdoing as well after being named in the Epstein files. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has also denied wrongdoing despite settling a lawsuit with Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre, while ex-Epstein girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell is currently serving time for sex trafficking. Photo by Yoshio Kuramitsu /Toronto Sun
Now, Big Max is again angling for a deal that will see her sprung back to her fine life of foie gras, galas, parties and kinky sex. And shockingly, some Republican members of the U.S. House Oversight Committee are open to the possibility of a presidential pardon for Maxwell.
Of course, she would have to share what she knows with the panel investigating Epstein’s evil apparatus. Maxwell testified in February but didn’t say a thing. Instead, she refused to answer “any substantive questions,” invoking her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
SEX TRAFFICKERS: Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. USDOJ
SEX TRAFFICKERS: Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. USDOJ
It was Maxwell who was left holding the bag when Epstein, 66, topped himself in a Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. None of the bold-faced names whispered have ever been charged.
There have been trickles and bits and bites of information released from the Epstein Files, but only Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (onetime Prince Andrew) has been charged and that was for misconduct in public office.
Trump mulled a Maxwell pardon
GOP Chair James Comer claimed committee members were divided on the Maxwell pardon issue. Only Trump can spring the sleazy socialite. So far, it’s been crickets on the White House’s intentions.
But Trump openly mulled giving Maxwell a pardon last October.
U.S. Representative Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the committee, later wrote on X: “@OversightDems are united in opposing a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell. It’s outrageous that any Republicans on our committee would consider this.”
In this photo illustration, the front page of Britain’s The Sun newspaper with an image of Andrew Mountbatten Windsor is seen on Oct. 31, 2025 in Windsor, England.
In this photo illustration, the front page of Britain’s The Sun newspaper with an image of Andrew Mountbatten Windsor is seen on Oct. 31, 2025 in Windsor, England. Photo by Ming Yeung /Getty Images
Comer also said he remains opposed to the idea and that the lack of agreement reduces the likelihood of a pardon-for-testimony deal.
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) echoed my thoughts on the matter in December.
Belongs in ‘maximum security’
Maxwell, he wrote on X, “(refused) to answer a single question about the men who raped underage girls, saying she would only do so if she received clemency from President Trump. She must immediately be sent back to the maximum security prison where she belongs.”
And where she should reside for the next 15 years.
Anyone who thinks Maxwell is going to say anything substantive to save herself is delusional. She wants something for nothing, no doubt, that coterie of kinkos who enjoyed sex with the underage girls that Maxwell groomed?
They will reward her handsomely for her discretion.
bhunter@postmedia.com
@HunterTOSun
penguinrandomhouse.com
torontosun.com
Her entire life has been a series of rescues by wealthy and powerful men
Author of the article:Brad Hunter
Published Apr 24, 2026 • Last updated 21 hours ago • 3 minute read
Ghislaine Maxwell
SHE LOOKS UNDERAGE! This undated photo released by the U.S. Department of Justice shows Ghislaine Maxwell. Photo by Uncredited /AP
Socialite turned sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has been a spoiled brat her entire life.
The very embodiment of the poor little rich girl.
The daughter of disgraced publishing mogul Robert Maxwell, the 64-year-old one-time paramour of billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein has been offered plenty of chances to do the right thing.
Maxwell has repeatedly refused.
(FILES) This undated photo provided by the US Justice Department on December 19, 2025 shows Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy US financier who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking underage girls, and his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell aboard a jet. Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell will be questioned behind closed doors by the US Congress on February 9, 2026, though she's expected to invoke her right to not answer questions.
(FILES) This undated photo provided by the US Justice Department on December 19, 2025 shows Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy US financier who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking underage girls, and his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell aboard a jet. Jeffrey Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell will be questioned behind closed doors by the US Congress on February 9, 2026, though she’s expected to invoke her right to not answer questions. Photo by HANDOUT /AFP
Now serving a 20-year jolt in a Texas Club Fed, even after her December 2021 conviction and the lurid allegations that emerged from the sex trafficking trial, she remains unbowed.
Her entire life has been a series of rescues by wealthy and powerful men. First, it was her father, then Epstein, her short-lived marriage to a fabulously rich hubby, and now, she’s looking to U.S. President Donald Trump.
‘She is an evil predator’
Author Barry Levine, who wrote The Spider: Inside the Tangled Web of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, could not withhold his contempt for Maxwell when we spoke last October.
“She is an evil, evil predator,” Levine said. “She told her friends that ‘these girls are nothing but trash.’ She was the one who recruited the girls, groomed them, and promised their parents they would get music lessons, voice lessons and acting lessons. The girls were being thrown to wolves.”
Some of the names entangled in the sick web of the late Jeffrey Epstein.
Some of the names entangled in the sick web of the late Jeffrey Epstein. Donald Trump, Bill Clinton and Brett Ratner have not been accused of any wrongdoing and have denied any wrongdoing as well after being named in the Epstein files. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has also denied wrongdoing despite settling a lawsuit with Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre, while ex-Epstein girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell is currently serving time for sex trafficking. Photo by Yoshio Kuramitsu /Toronto Sun
Now, Big Max is again angling for a deal that will see her sprung back to her fine life of foie gras, galas, parties and kinky sex. And shockingly, some Republican members of the U.S. House Oversight Committee are open to the possibility of a presidential pardon for Maxwell.
Of course, she would have to share what she knows with the panel investigating Epstein’s evil apparatus. Maxwell testified in February but didn’t say a thing. Instead, she refused to answer “any substantive questions,” invoking her Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
SEX TRAFFICKERS: Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. USDOJ
SEX TRAFFICKERS: Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. USDOJ
It was Maxwell who was left holding the bag when Epstein, 66, topped himself in a Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. None of the bold-faced names whispered have ever been charged.
There have been trickles and bits and bites of information released from the Epstein Files, but only Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (onetime Prince Andrew) has been charged and that was for misconduct in public office.
Trump mulled a Maxwell pardon
GOP Chair James Comer claimed committee members were divided on the Maxwell pardon issue. Only Trump can spring the sleazy socialite. So far, it’s been crickets on the White House’s intentions.
But Trump openly mulled giving Maxwell a pardon last October.
U.S. Representative Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the committee, later wrote on X: “@OversightDems are united in opposing a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell. It’s outrageous that any Republicans on our committee would consider this.”
In this photo illustration, the front page of Britain’s The Sun newspaper with an image of Andrew Mountbatten Windsor is seen on Oct. 31, 2025 in Windsor, England.
In this photo illustration, the front page of Britain’s The Sun newspaper with an image of Andrew Mountbatten Windsor is seen on Oct. 31, 2025 in Windsor, England. Photo by Ming Yeung /Getty Images
Comer also said he remains opposed to the idea and that the lack of agreement reduces the likelihood of a pardon-for-testimony deal.
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) echoed my thoughts on the matter in December.
Belongs in ‘maximum security’
Maxwell, he wrote on X, “(refused) to answer a single question about the men who raped underage girls, saying she would only do so if she received clemency from President Trump. She must immediately be sent back to the maximum security prison where she belongs.”
And where she should reside for the next 15 years.
Anyone who thinks Maxwell is going to say anything substantive to save herself is delusional. She wants something for nothing, no doubt, that coterie of kinkos who enjoyed sex with the underage girls that Maxwell groomed?
They will reward her handsomely for her discretion.
bhunter@postmedia.com
@HunterTOSun
The Spider by Barry Levine: 9780593237182 | PenguinRandomHouse.com: Books
Who was Jeffrey Epstein? Donald Trump has called the ongoing interest in the details about Epstein’s web of clients and enablers a “hoax.” But in this book, a Pulitzer Prize–nominated...
penguinrandomhouse.com
HUNTER: A pardon for sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell? Why?
Her entire life has been a series of rescues by wealthy and powerful men. Read on.
Journalist Katie Phang sues acting attorney general Todd Blanche over Epstein files — Guardian US
Lawsuit alleges DoJ broke transparency law by withholding records on Jeffrey Epstein and over-redacting disclosures
The action on Monday by Katie Phang, an investigative journalist and legal analyst, seeks to hold Blanche personally responsible for the justice department’s alleged failure to publish all the documents the government holds about Jeffrey Epstein, the late sex offender. A full release was mandated by a landmark transparency act passed by Congress in November, with a deadline of 19 December 2025.
Blanche, who was the deputy attorney general until Pam Bondi was fired earlier this month, has since been accused of stalling the process and releasing only a fraction of the papers.
Blanche’s defence? It was Bondi? Phang’s lawsuit, filed in federal court on Monday in the US district court for the District of Columbia, names Blanche as the defendant and alleges misconduct on several levels. It accuses Blanche of missing statutory deadlines for document production, improper or excessive redactions, failure to explain redactions as required by law, and withholding or retracting key documents after release.