Omnibus Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell
- Thread starter Tecumsehsbones
- Start date
The only dot is nobody will stand for their crimes.
Well, if that’s the case, then exposing the ones protecting them for what they actually are doing…at least that’s something. Can’t see that happening either but…
On the evidence presented. Gawd sent bears to rip apart 42 kids because they made fun of Gawd's prophet.
How many people has Satan gruesomely murdered for teasing one of his employees?
In case your wondering, it's 2 Kings, 23-24.
How many people has Satan gruesomely murdered for teasing one of his employees?
In case your wondering, it's 2 Kings, 23-24.
Amanda Ungaro - Wikipedia
Crockett says Oversights Democrats will move to hold Bondi in contempt — The Hill
Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) said Tuesday that Democrats will move to hold former Attorney General Pam Bondi in contempt for failing to appear for a deposition as part of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s Jeffrey Epstein probe.
2 GOP backers of Bondi subpoena signal resistance to contempt push — The Hill
Two House Republicans who backed the subpoena of former Attorney General Pam Bondi expressed resistance to joining Democrats in seeking to hold her in contempt after the Justice Department said she would not appear for a scheduled deposition.
Live updates: Eric Swalwell under criminal investigation after new accuser speaks out; Democrats threaten to hold Pam Bondi in contempt of Congress — NBC News
Both Swalwell and embattled Rep. Tony Gonzales resigned from Congress today, pre-empting a push by their House colleagues to expel them from office.
Pam Bondi - Wikipedia
So now “former” (as of 12 days ago) attorney general Pam Bondi could be charged with contempt of Congress after failing to appear for a scheduled deposition for her testimony in a long-running investigation into the federal government’s handling of investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.
But last week, the Department of Justice claimed the subpoena “no longer applies.” If so, that’s awfully convenient.
Rep. Robert Garcia, the committee’s top Democrat, said in a statement Tuesday that the (as of 12 days ago) former attorney general “is evading a lawful congressional subpoena” by refusing to testify about the Epstein files “and the White House cover-up.”
“This subpoena applies to her regardless of her title,” he said. “She must appear before the committee, and if she continues to ignore the law, Oversight Democrats will move forward with contempt proceedings immediately. We will fight until there is true accountability and justice.”
Pam Bondi could be held in contempt after failing to show up for Epstein testimony
Former attorney general is ‘evading a lawful congressional subpoena,’ according to top Democrat on House Oversight Committee
www.independent.co.uk
A federal judge dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over a report about a 50th birthday card he “allegedly” sent to Jeffrey Epstein.
apple.news
First lady Melania Trump gave a bewildering April 9 brief speech from the White House, which nobody asked for or was expecting, in which she complained about "false smears" connecting her with Epstein, despite plenty of photographs that have circulated for years that show her and her husband quite cozy with the sex offender.
Former Attorney General Pam Bondi, who did more than anyone in the Trump administration to make the Epstein files a political minefield, kept the scandal's renewed momentum going by refusing to comply with a lawfully issued subpoena from the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which wanted to question her about the files.
And then acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, picking up right where Bondi left off before Trump fired her on April 2 for this mess, appeared on Fox News on April 14 with a message that amounted to: The Department of Justice has provided an unfettered view … to everything we want you to see in the Epstein files, and now this is over?
In his interview, the acting attorney general insisted that the DOJ reviewed 6 million (so roughly double what has actually been released) documents and released "anything associated with the Epstein files.”
A bipartisan movement in Congress, driven specifically by the DOJ's lack of transparency in the Epstein files, overwhelmingly passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November. Trump, who fought to stop that legislation, grudgingly signed it into law.
The DOJ didn't meet the 30-day deadline to release all of the Epstein files. And the two key sponsors of the legislation, Republican U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna of California, told me the DOJ still hasn't complied with the law.
Blanche told Fox News that any member of Congress can come to the DOJ and inspect the Epstein files in unredacted format. But here's what Blanche didn't say: He's making the call on what is and is not an Epstein file, and what Congress can and cannot see.
Bondi claimed she could skip the House Oversight Committee subpoena because she's no longer attorney general. But a bipartisan mix of committee members still want to hear from Bondi, and a spokesperson for the committee said it would work to reschedule her testimony.
It's no coincidence that Trump fired Bondi just before she's supposed to testify. He didn't want us to hear what she would say. So it's “likely”
Bondi will resist complying with her subpoena.
apple.news
Trump loses his Epstein case, Dems score another court win — MS NOW
A federal judge dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over a report about a 50th birthday card he allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein. Plus, New York Attorney General Letitia James on the verdict against Ticketmaster and Live Nation. (The Beat's...
Former Attorney General Pam Bondi, who did more than anyone in the Trump administration to make the Epstein files a political minefield, kept the scandal's renewed momentum going by refusing to comply with a lawfully issued subpoena from the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which wanted to question her about the files.
And then acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, picking up right where Bondi left off before Trump fired her on April 2 for this mess, appeared on Fox News on April 14 with a message that amounted to: The Department of Justice has provided an unfettered view … to everything we want you to see in the Epstein files, and now this is over?
In his interview, the acting attorney general insisted that the DOJ reviewed 6 million (so roughly double what has actually been released) documents and released "anything associated with the Epstein files.”
A bipartisan movement in Congress, driven specifically by the DOJ's lack of transparency in the Epstein files, overwhelmingly passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November. Trump, who fought to stop that legislation, grudgingly signed it into law.
The DOJ didn't meet the 30-day deadline to release all of the Epstein files. And the two key sponsors of the legislation, Republican U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna of California, told me the DOJ still hasn't complied with the law.
Blanche told Fox News that any member of Congress can come to the DOJ and inspect the Epstein files in unredacted format. But here's what Blanche didn't say: He's making the call on what is and is not an Epstein file, and what Congress can and cannot see.
Bondi claimed she could skip the House Oversight Committee subpoena because she's no longer attorney general. But a bipartisan mix of committee members still want to hear from Bondi, and a spokesperson for the committee said it would work to reschedule her testimony.
It's no coincidence that Trump fired Bondi just before she's supposed to testify. He didn't want us to hear what she would say. So it's “likely”
Bondi will resist complying with her subpoena.Opinion | Bondi may be out, but DOJ's Epstein files cover-up remains | Opinion — USA TODAY
Hmm, a drawn-out fight about transparency and the Epstein files in the lead-up to the midterms. What could go wrong for Republicans there?
So who is the new cult leader?A federal judge dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over a report about a 50th birthday card he “allegedly” sent to Jeffrey Epstein.
First lady Melania Trump gave a bewildering April 9 brief speech from the White House, which nobody asked for or was expecting, in which she complained about "false smears" connecting her with Epstein, despite plenty of photographs that have circulated for years that show her and her husband quite cozy with the sex offender.Trump loses his Epstein case, Dems score another court win — MS NOW
A federal judge dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over a report about a 50th birthday card he allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein. Plus, New York Attorney General Letitia James on the verdict against Ticketmaster and Live Nation. (The Beat's...
View attachment 34131
Former Attorney General Pam Bondi, who did more than anyone in the Trump administration to make the Epstein files a political minefield, kept the scandal's renewed momentum going by refusing to comply with a lawfully issued subpoena from the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which wanted to question her about the files.
And then acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, picking up right where Bondi left off before Trump fired her on April 2 for this mess, appeared on Fox News on April 14 with a message that amounted to: The Department of Justice has provided an unfettered view … to everything we want you to see in the Epstein files, and now this is over?
In his interview, the acting attorney general insisted that the DOJ reviewed 6 million (so roughly double what has actually been released) documents and released "anything associated with the Epstein files.”
A bipartisan movement in Congress, driven specifically by the DOJ's lack of transparency in the Epstein files, overwhelmingly passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November. Trump, who fought to stop that legislation, grudgingly signed it into law.
The DOJ didn't meet the 30-day deadline to release all of the Epstein files. And the two key sponsors of the legislation, Republican U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna of California, told me the DOJ still hasn't complied with the law.
Blanche told Fox News that any member of Congress can come to the DOJ and inspect the Epstein files in unredacted format. But here's what Blanche didn't say: He's making the call on what is and is not an Epstein file, and what Congress can and cannot see.
Bondi claimed she could skip the House Oversight Committee subpoena because she's no longer attorney general. But a bipartisan mix of committee members still want to hear from Bondi, and a spokesperson for the committee said it would work to reschedule her testimony.
It's no coincidence that Trump fired Bondi just before she's supposed to testify. He didn't want us to hear what she would say. So it's “likely”
Opinion | Bondi may be out, but DOJ's Epstein files cover-up remains | Opinion — USA TODAY
Hmm, a drawn-out fight about transparency and the Epstein files in the lead-up to the midterms. What could go wrong for Republicans there?