Internet has changed journalism in unexpected ways

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
http://www.thechronicleherald.ca/World/1044221.html

NEW YORK — The Internet has profoundly changed journalism, but not necessarily in ways that were predicted even a few years ago, a study on the industry released Sunday found.

It was believed at one point that the Net would democratize the media, offering many new voices, stories and perspectives. Yet the news agenda actually seems to be narrowing, with many websites primarily packaging news that is produced elsewhere, according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism’s annual State of the News Media report.

Two stories — the war in Iraq and the 2008 presidential election campaign — represented more than a quarter of the stories in newspapers, on television and online last year, the project found.

Take away Iraq, Iran and Pakistan, and news from all of the other countries in the world combined filled up less than six per cent of the American news hole, the project said.

The news side of the business is dynamic, but the growing ability of news consumers to find what they want without being distracted by advertising is what’s making the industry go through some tough times.

"Although the audience for traditional news is maintaining itself, the staff for any of these news organizations tend to be shrinking," said Tom Rosenstiel, the project’s director.

NBC News’ recent decision to make David Gregory host of a nightly program on MSNBC while keeping his job as White House correspondent is an example of how people are being asked to do much more, he said.

News is less a product, like the day’s newspaper or a nightly newscast, than a service that is constantly being updated, he said. Last week, for instance, The New York Times posted its first report linking New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer to a prostitution ring in the early afternoon, and it quickly became the day’s dominant story.

Only a few years ago, newspaper websites were primarily considered an online morgue for that day’s newspaper, Rosenstiel said.

"The afternoon newspaper is in a sense being reborn online," he said.

A separate survey found journalists are, to a large degree, embracing the changes being thrust upon them. A majority say they like doing blogs and that they appreciate reader feedback on their stories. When they’re asked to do multimedia projects, most journalists find the experience enriching instead of feeling overworked, he said. The newsroom is increasingly being seen as the most experimental place in the business, the report found.

Most news websites are no longer final destinations. The report found that many users insist that the sites, and even individual pages, offer plenty of options to navigate elsewhere for more information, the project found. Rosenstiel said he’s even able to reach Washington Post stories through the New York Times’ website.

In another unexpected finding, citizen-created websites and blogs are actually far less welcoming to outside commentary than the so-called mainstream media, the report said.
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
I hate to burst your bubble, but when someone writes a pay-check to you for presenting the "news" your perspective on "truth" will change. When the internet is examined for both accuracy and objectivity, it's readily apparent that the greater dynamic at work is personal and individual, interspersed with desperate ideologues who can't imagine living in a world where the truth can stand alone....Where "truth" can't be presented without "spin" without "advertising" without being shapened and massaged so that the great unwashed will simply swallow it all without thinking about it....

Leave the conditioning and propaganda to the TV.....

It doesn't take a mind to watch CNN or FOX, it only takes an observer....
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Since when has TV required a "mind" to watch anything? It's not like you can actively participate in a one way media. You take what's given to you and hopefully you can tell the difference between fact & fiction.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
I hate to burst your bubble, but when someone writes a pay-check to you for presenting the "news" your perspective on "truth" will change. When the internet is examined for both accuracy and objectivity, it's readily apparent that the greater dynamic at work is personal and individual, interspersed with desperate ideologues who can't imagine living in a world where the truth can stand alone....Where "truth" can't be presented without "spin" without "advertising" without being shapened and massaged so that the great unwashed will simply swallow it all without thinking about it....

Leave the conditioning and propaganda to the TV.....

It doesn't take a mind to watch CNN or FOX, it only takes an observer....

Um.... exactly what bubble are you talking about? I just posted the article, I didn't state if I agreed or disagreed with it, therefore there's no bubble to attempt to burst in the first place :-?