World's Tallest Woman

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
This lady's name is Heather. She is apparently seven feet four inches tall......Who's going to argue?

 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I'm suddenly in love, I thought it would never happen again but the women of my dreams really exists. We must have her, she is the much prophesied perfect women who can pull a double furrowed plow while being stunningly beautifull.

Reminds me of an old joke too. When we're nose to nose my toes are in IT when we're toes to toes my nose is in IT.---------------------------------please forgive me I couldn't help myself.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
I've seen this a year or so ago, and the photos in my professional opinion are fake.

Take a look at the street pic and the halo of lighter texture to the right of her lower left leg.... cutout. Hell the tree shadows don't even line up.

Amateurs

The shadowing in the 2nd image could have been done a lot better then they did, but by the looks of the low resolution and artifacting to mask the editing, they didn't have much to go by. At least they could have matched the shade of the guy's existing shadow.

And if you can't pick up on that, look at the cutout effect on her arse compared to the blinds in the window.... suttle but it's there. They should really learn how to zoom in when trying to crop and blow things up from one photo to another.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
I've seen this a year or so ago, and the photos in my professional opinion are fake.

Take a look at the street pic and the halo of lighter texture to the right of her lower left leg.... cutout. Hell the tree shadows don't even line up.

Amateurs

The shadowing in the 2nd image could have been done a lot better then they did, but by the looks of the low resolution and artifacting to mask the editing, they didn't have much to go by. At least they could have matched the shade of the guy's existing shadow.

And if you can't pick up on that, look at the cutout effect on her arse compared to the blinds in the window.... suttle but it's there. They should really learn how to zoom in when trying to crop and blow things up from one photo to another.
I see what you mean. There is a seam that doesn't match the other contours.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Well Beaver, if 6'5" is good enough, then she'd be your dream woman alright.

http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/tallwoman.asp

And just to burst everyone else's bubble, those additional pics might have looked more realistic if she was actually looking at the people staring at her, rather then over their heads.

Oh! and back on the water cooler one, there's a black chunk showing between her forearms and crotch area, yet not in this pic in post #1.

*tisk tisk*

Added:

(BTW: that above link's explorer title says "Urban Legends Reference Pages:")
 
Last edited:

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Your not thinking clearly Durka, that would be several more square feet of lickable surface area, and she could carry you over the threshhold under one arm and a double flat of bear under the other.

lmao! Hook a chariot up to here and you're good to go
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
I've seen this a year or so ago, and the photos in my professional opinion are fake.

Take a look at the street pic and the halo of lighter texture to the right of her lower left leg.... cutout. Hell the tree shadows don't even line up.

Amateurs

The shadowing in the 2nd image could have been done a lot better then they did, but by the looks of the low resolution and artifacting to mask the editing, they didn't have much to go by. At least they could have matched the shade of the guy's existing shadow.

And if you can't pick up on that, look at the cutout effect on her arse compared to the blinds in the window.... suttle but it's there. They should really learn how to zoom in when trying to crop and blow things up from one photo to another.

yeah, they've been proven not to be fakes... but I see what you're talking about, so hmmmm. lol.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
compare the water cooler pic on snopes to the one posted here... she's a different height in each
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
What a bunch of nit-pickers...:smile:

I got this in an e-mail this morning.....If she weighs 350 lbs. it only proves we aren't fat....We are just too short....:lol:
 

Charshine

New Member
Mar 4, 2008
46
1
8
43
Vancouver, BC
Sure they are fake, but it's one of those mindless e-mails it's just fun to get once in awhile.

In the picture where she is bending over...i have a feeling the huge smile on the guy's face is because he is staring into gigantic boobs! :D
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
Sure they are fake, but it's one of those mindless e-mails it's just fun to get once in awhile.

In the picture where she is bending over...i have a feeling the huge smile on the guy's face is because he is staring into gigantic boobs! :D

It's almost bestiality if he touches those boobs though. She needs to either join the NBA or be studied in a lab.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
What a bunch of nit-pickers...:smile:

Well of course... it's a debate forum ;-) But besides that, it's also a good exercise for people to know what to look for in fabricated imagery. You never know, you might get a lawsuit with some guy showing a picture of you smashing his car up with a bat :-?

Even if it's really true and that was you smashing up the car, if you can find a few things to nit pick to give reasonable doubt, then you might get away with it *he he*