I second Hermann's good point Karrie, damn good point.
I agree. A very good point.
I second Hermann's good point Karrie, damn good point.
(((Huuuugggzzzzz)))
So, has anyone kept score?
No hugs.
No midriff baring shirts.
No shirts with certain bands/logos/
No miniskirts.
No religious symbols.
No hats.
Looks like: schools 6, children's freedom of expression 0.
They do elude to the "inappropriate" behavior that could come from hugging. Being "too close". I wonder how much of this is just prudishness?
You have to establish distance between people to permit re-working them into what you want them to be...to become...
If you feel another human being's arms around you and a moment of love and compassion or even simply camraderie were permitted to exist...well you'd have to recognize others as real human beings too....
Not something an accountant or statistician for the "machine" thinks appropriate in the larger picture...
Not to mention even their lunches are under scrutiny.
My kids came home the other day with their ginger candies still in their lunch kits. Why? Because they're not supposed to have candy at school. Mind you, if I were to buy them milk tickets, they could have had chocolate milk instead. But no... must keep them away from those evil ginger candies a kid couldn't possibly eat more than one or two of a day, and get them guzzling chocolate milk at every meal. GGgggrrrr. I've had the same thing happen with teachers criticizing me for sending cookies for snack (home-made, applesauce instead of butter, cookies). While the other kids chow down on lunchables or granola bars, I get bitched out because my kid's snack fits the 'cookie criteria'.
Not to mention even their lunches are under scrutiny.
My kids came home the other day with their ginger candies still in their lunch kits. Why? Because they're not supposed to have candy at school. Mind you, if I were to buy them milk tickets, they could have had chocolate milk instead. But no... must keep them away from those evil ginger candies a kid couldn't possibly eat more than one or two of a day, and get them guzzling chocolate milk at every meal. GGgggrrrr. I've had the same thing happen with teachers criticizing me for sending cookies for snack (home-made, applesauce instead of butter, cookies). While the other kids chow down on lunchables or granola bars, I get bitched out because my kid's snack fits the 'cookie criteria'.
That is absolute bullsh*t. What gives them the right to say what you can send your child in their lunch? If they want to create healthy choices in their cafeteria menus, fine. However, don't say what they can and can't eat(allergies notwithstanding...this is just them going way overboard on the "gotta have kids eating healthy"). Can you tell this irks me?
Seems Canada has the same idea ... One blog from 2006...
http://trashysworld.wordpress.com/2006/12/14/teachers-schools-and-the-evils-of-hugging/