George w bush brother in law was in charge of wtc security since 1996, plenty of time to do it and plan it.
9/11, overwhelming proof from alex jones at prison planet
- Thread starter wallyj
- Start date
George w bush brother in law was in charge of wtc security since 1996, plenty of time to do it and plan it.
This comment from someone who thinks four big airplanes can hide from pounce-happy zoomies.:lol:
Wolf
Not brother in law, i made a mistake, the president’s younger brother , Marvin P. Bush, , was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center.
Well that technologie exist.
http://www.eotech-inc.com/lawe_hwsmodels.php
and apperently there was no plane that crashed.....
So yes it is a possibility, you can't refute it.
I SAW THE PHUCKIN PLANE HIT. I FELT THE HEAT FROM THE IMPACT, DEBRIS RAINED ON MY HEAD.
GET A LIFE!!!
Easy, ITN.
Not that I blame you, but you are flogging a dead horse.....brain dead that is.
Logic 7 would not believe the truth if he WAS there, and large pieces of debris rained on his head..........
Then again, that might explain a lot.
Anyway, it ain't worth raising your blood pressure over.
Funny how you denial guys all flog theorys of phantom planes .Seeing how the guys who came up with that theory have been proven disinfo agents :lol:ITN you saw the planes hit maybe.All we can go by is your word and judging that from what i know about you it aint worth much .No planes hit building 7 and even your own goverment says it can't come up with an explanation why it came down.Even some of the so called highjackers are still alive .Theres big holes in the official story people and thats just a fact .Nobodys saying planes did not impact the towers except the proven disinfo agents themselves .
This is a LIE. you and I have both seen the video which shows that the towers took MUCH longer than free-fall would have taken.
whether or not WTC7 was hit by any parts of a plane is a question I don't have the knowledge to answer but it WAS hit by a giant cloud of debris from one of the largest buildings on earth collapsing very close to it, and that debris DID damage it, according to eyewitnesses
where exactly were you when it happened? i iknow new york a lot, to see the plane crashing on wtc, you must have been in a very good spot, or on a top of abuilding, tell me.
If the debris rained on your head, then you must have been very close to the tower, however being very close to the tower, you couldnt havent seen the plane comings, the buildings in that area are way too high, nice try.
Building 7 fell in 6.5 sec, free fall speed is 6 sec, and secondly, to pull a building down with explosives, doesnt make the building fall at free fall speed, close yes but not exactly.
According to witnesses, bombs were going off on the 8th floor of the building, and was barely touch by north wtc collapse,you can clearly see video on youtube, when there is building 4, 5 and 6, and the deutch bank which has been touch by the debris 10 times more than wtc 7, but didnt collapse.
Not only this, but wtc 7 was heavily repaired to be even more secure in 1989, so guys again and again, poor try.!!
so you ignore the eyewitness who's posting directly to you, but take up the evidence you found on some nut-job's conspiracy website.
that's logical.
that's logical.
Why don't you crawl back into that socialist cesspool and leave reasonable and common sense arguments to those who have half a wit.
When the first plane hit I was on top of 30 West Broadway. When the second plane hit on was 100 feet away from the plaza on the south side.
I was about 150 feet away at that point.
I couldn't have seen them? Bull****. More bull**** and more assumptions. Seek help. I mean it.
at this point I'd like to solemnly apologise for suggesting the ranking system that would eventually give rise to Mr Logic being described as a "super genius".
Saying that you couldn't see the planes because the buildings are tall is like suggesting you wouldn't see birds when walking in a forest because the trees are tall. Admittedly it's more difficult, but given the right angles, and also given the fact that planes MOVE (and therefore can go from areas where they'd be hidden, to areas where they are not, and back again), there's a good chance you'd see it. Especially if it sounded dangerously low and then crashed into a building resulting in a cloud of debris.
Hard to miss, really...
Saying that you couldn't see the planes because the buildings are tall is like suggesting you wouldn't see birds when walking in a forest because the trees are tall. Admittedly it's more difficult, but given the right angles, and also given the fact that planes MOVE (and therefore can go from areas where they'd be hidden, to areas where they are not, and back again), there's a good chance you'd see it. Especially if it sounded dangerously low and then crashed into a building resulting in a cloud of debris.
Hard to miss, really...
Nobody is denying people died. What everyone wants to know is WHY?
I can buy it was fire and not explosive demolition that brought down WTC's 1 and 2. I've studied enough of the mechanics of it and my own curiosity has been satisfied there. I can buy that debris rained down on WTC 7, causing serious structural damage and fire. Apparently the design has a lethal flaw.
I can buy that a plane went in at Shanksville. Heroics? Maybe. I won't prove otherwise. I did hear earlier reports of an air-to-air missile. I can accept it as in defense of National Security seeing as how Flight 93 passed at least three airports capable of handling it and was still airborne on a course for Washington more than a half hour after the Ground order was issued.
I can even stretch myself beyond logic and limit and imagine some extremely lucky terrorist holding a large aircraft on a straight and level course (riding compressive wave and all) at an altitude just high enough the engine nacelles didn't eat earth on the flight into the Pentagon. Perhaps it was because he didn't know it couldn't be done - or fly-by-wire can perform miracles.
Sorry, I do NOT buy the two most vital parts of the official story....
Inexperienced terrorists took over four airliners in flight - at heights no landmarks are visible, at places over a hunderd miles from their eventual destinations. They lacked the knowledge to reprogram auto pilots and sure as hell wouldn't recognize anything on the ground.
All four planes disappeared from radar. All four planes re-appeared minus transponder data. All four aircraft were reported by people on board to be hijacked. All four planes went rogue - left their flight paths - and jinked around in the busiest airspace in the United States. ATC even reported hijacked aircraft in a real world situation to the military ... and the Great U S Air Force missed that?
Wargames or not, they're supposed to be able to defend your country against experienced bomber pilots and guided missiles. I have seen these guys in action at CFB North Bay - the Canadian end of NORAD. Perhaps you can begin to see where my doubts are born.
Wolf
Last edited:
Owing to distance and speed, the plane would be considerably AHEAD of that point where the sound is heard to originate. Doppler effect.
Wolf
yes, but regardless of that, when you're ina city and you hear a loud jet engine, the first thing you do is think "wtf is that?" then you look up, and turn your head like an owl on a turntable to find out where it's coming from. You're hardly going to look at the exact spot you think your ears are telling you sound comes from, see nothing and then decide you imagined it.