Iraq War: Collateral Damage

JBeee

Time Out
Jun 1, 2007
1,826
52
48
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER EDITORIAL BOARD
That wars yield collateral damage is something we know, but tend not to dwell upon. It's just too horrible to think of. The worst of the worst of those unbearable thoughts has to be what becomes of the children, who, it seems, pay the highest price for whatever conflict in the midst of which they find themselves.
In 2002, a United Nations emergency preparedness report estimated that roughly 1.26 million Iraqi children would die in the event of a conflict there. Just how many children have died as the result of the war in Iraq is unclear, but what of the ones who live? What sort of life, if any at all, awaits them?
According to Dr. Abdul Kareem Al Obaidi, who is the chairman of the Iraqi Association for Child Mental Health, Iraqi kids are suffering serious psychological and behavioral problems (depression, post-traumatic stress, anxiety, substance abuse, high rates of truancy, etc.) that weren't common in Iraq's roughly 16 million children prior to the war.
In a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Al Obaidi outlined the "desperate" situation of children dealing with "unbearable traumas and heart-wrenching experiences." Quoted in Britain's Independent newspaper, Al Obaidi's letter said, "Our children carry the future of Iraq and that future is being corrupted. The risk is great, not just for our country, but for the region and the world."
What can be salvaged for those children is uncertain. But while we're liberating their country and spreading democracy there, perhaps we should give some thought as to what sort of future we're mapping out for Iraq by leaving its people with a population of damaged children who will one day become broken, angry adults with clear memories of how they came to be so.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
Hmmm... And Hitler himself was an angry WWI vet. Are we laying the foundations of another war a generation from now when the next generation fo Iraqis seek revenge on behalf of the older generation?

And what about democracy? The freedom to have nightmares? The freedom to be enraged? The freedom to despair? The freedom to vent? But how?
 

55Mercury

rigid member
May 31, 2007
4,390
1,065
113
I think democracy's paradox is that when you force it on a people they will elect not your ally, but your enemy. - which couldn't be a good plan, unless you're an arms manufacturer or something.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
The lesson should be you go to war with a worldwide mandate. It doesn't have to be a UN security council mandate but one that most people of the world can see is the right thing. It should be patently obvious that war is not only necessary but also a last resort. This war was about building a political wedge for the 2004 election. A "with us or with the terrorists" political football with not one iota of attempt at anything but starting a war.

The other lesson of course would be to not elect morons like George Bush.
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
The lesson should be you go to war with a worldwide mandate. It doesn't have to be a UN security council mandate but one that most people of the world can see is the right thing. It should be patently obvious that war is not only necessary but also a last resort. This war was about building a political wedge for the 2004 election. A "with us or with the terrorists" political football with not one iota of attempt at anything but starting a war.

The other lesson of course would be to not elect morons like George Bush.

I certainly 2nd that motion, what that man has done, is a 'dirty rotton shame', and each day, when
I see him on the TV, with that 'smirk' on his face, as he still seems to think so much of himself, I
could 'puke'.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
I certainly 2nd that motion, what that man has done, is a 'dirty rotton shame', and each day, when
I see him on the TV, with that 'smirk' on his face, as he still seems to think so much of himself, I
could 'puke'.

Are you sure he thinks?
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
Are you sure he thinks?

Actually, now that you mention it, no. He is a 'vain' puppet, controlled by the low life around him,
and he was chosen to become president,( by Carl Rove and Company,) because he was so easy to manipulate.
So, no, he doesn't actually have the capacity to think for himself, but he does know how to stand
in front of a crowd and 'act'.