Define God?!...........

Northboy

Northboy

Electoral Member
Jun 4, 2005
988
12
18
70
Vanderhoof, BC
reinventthevillage.blogspot.com
Silkwhip said:
I believe that God is equal to the Tao and the "definition" remains the same. The God that can be explained is not God.
Click to expand...

A possible restatement might be that we all reflect in some way the nature of God as he has presented himself to Mankind..But he told us this in the beginning of the second book....to his children...We've barely got our hands out of the cookie jar....Remember that a wise man who thinks he's wise is a fool..More to learn yet..
 
selfactivated

selfactivated

Time Out
Apr 11, 2006
4,276
42
48
62
Richmond, Virginia
Northboy said:
A possible restatement might be that we all reflect in some way the nature of God as he has presented himself to Mankind..But he told us this in the beginning of the second book....to his children...We've barely got our hands out of the cookie jar....Remember that a wise man who thinks he's wise is a fool..More to learn yet..
Click to expand...

I like that. The more I know, The more I know I dont know.
 
Dexter Sinister

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Chukcha said:
If you can decide for someone that they don't need a reason give them a reason WHY NOT.
Click to expand...
Why should I? I'm not deciding anything for anyone, I'm just telling you the way it looks to me.

Exactly, so when are you going to know? before you try to discourage other's believes can you harry up and give a clear understanding.
Click to expand...
What a silly question. How could anyone possibly predict when we're going to know something? You seem to think that because we don't know it now, we'll never know it and cannot know it. That's foolish.


Lets assume your theory is smarter and wiser than the theory was brought to us by Christ.
Click to expand...
uh... okay. What theory is that?

Again, I want you to be responsible for what you're saying, so prove it, just like you want you proof vice versa.
Click to expand...
I'll happily take complete responsibility for what I say. I said there was no evidence. You're the one making the claim, you provide the evidence that supports it.

So why those "few" were able to fly? Just out of curiousity, I never understood why, so I decided to ask someone more knowledgeable. You didn't really answer the question, instead you've asked the question at the end of your message.
Click to expand...
Read the books.
 
vinod1975

vinod1975

Council Member
Jan 19, 2007
1,069
3
38
50
Harare , Zimbabwe
ok....for me 'god' is son/lover/consort of Goddess/nature/Cosmos

he is also the sacred psychedelic mushroom

Gifts of Mother Earth

In calassical Dionysianism--last vestige in Europe of Goddess religion, the celebrants. bacchantes believed tat their sacrament WAS Dionysos. the god o Nture, son of the Goddess

so, they believed they were possessed by Dionysos, god of Nature. and we know god of Nature is LOVER of Goddess...right?

tis i powerful metaphor for ecstati love of Nture where one's rigid sense of oneself dissolved in enthusiastic abandon, where All becomes deep in MEANING

thetrouble begins is when a concep called 'God' is divorced from experience, ad we get all te riid dogma and conflictual scenarios, of one 'God' aginst anote 'God' etc

this secular era's 'God' is £$profit$£
 
Northboy

Northboy

Electoral Member
Jun 4, 2005
988
12
18
70
Vanderhoof, BC
reinventthevillage.blogspot.com
vinod1975 said:
ok....for me 'god' is son/lover/consort of Goddess/nature/Cosmos

he is also the sacred psychedelic mushroom

Gifts of Mother Earth

In calassical Dionysianism--last vestige in Europe of Goddess religion, the celebrants. bacchantes believed tat their sacrament WAS Dionysos. the god o Nture, son of the Goddess

so, they believed they were possessed by Dionysos, god of Nature. and we know god of Nature is LOVER of Goddess...right?

tis i powerful metaphor for ecstati love of Nture where one's rigid sense of oneself dissolved in enthusiastic abandon, where All becomes deep in MEANING

thetrouble begins is when a concep called 'God' is divorced from experience, ad we get all te riid dogma and conflictual scenarios, of one 'God' aginst anote 'God' etc

this secular era's 'God' is £$profit$£
Click to expand...

Wise deduction....a product of your heritage??
 
Chukcha

Chukcha

Electoral Member
Sep 19, 2006
215
1
18
Dexter Sinister said:
Why should I? I'm not deciding anything for anyone, I'm just telling you the way it looks to me.
Click to expand...
I will tell you WHY, because you're suggesting it. Why are you suggesting not to have a reason, if someone believes there should be? Were you in a place of any of those who were in need of a REASON? I don't think so. So please provide a reason for your suggestion for not to have one.:evil3:

Dexter Sinister said:
What a silly question. How could anyone possibly predict when we're going to know something? You seem to think that because we don't know it now, we'll never know it and cannot know it. That's foolish.
Click to expand...
My question is no more silly than your answer. Don't you think? I actually Bolded and Capitalized words: REASON and EVIDENCE, yet you've ignored it and still didn't provide any evidence nor reaons but still answered to my post. So who is more foolish? Lets say both of us to avoid conflict.:angel8:

Dexter Sinister said:
uh... okay. What theory is that?
Click to expand...
That just depends if you really want to know that theory, or the other. Up to you really...

Dexter Sinister said:
I'll happily take complete responsibility for what I say. I said there was no evidence. You're the one making the claim, you provide the evidence that supports it.
Click to expand...
No, I am simply asking the questions, nothing personal to you or anybody else. Can you answer them? No? Because we still haven't proven anything? I know that you haven't proven anything, I don't need to know that though, I want to hear different answers. Can you???
Dexter Sinister said:
Read the books.
Click to expand...
I like reading you posts for example, you should WRITE BOOKS
 
L Gilbert

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
vinod1975 said:
God is simply a trust that you make in something or I would say super natural power and as PsyOp said God is two being, a men a women, its been wrote in the first page of the bible, very much correct and now about the incident , have seen a man who did not had anything from last 80 years not even a single drop of water or food and he was recently on TV on STAR... so whats that no saying that he is god but somthing unusal
Click to expand...
It's physically impossible for a person to last much longer than 3 or 4 days without water. I don't care how much spirit they have, without food and with water they'd be toast within a few weeks.
 
Last edited:
L Gilbert

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Chukcha said:
My applaudisements to you, very very trully good answsers, especially they provide lots and lots of knowledgeable evidence and truth. Not.
"seriously, how do you stop yapping?"
Click to expand...
Okay, pilgrim, read this:

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000D4FEC-7D5B-1D07-8E49809EC588EEDF

You obviously have no clue as to what evolution is.

Your turn, please provide proof that your christ existed. I mean scientific proof, not hearsay from the book of myths (the holey babble).

BTW, what is an applaudisement? Clapping on concrete?
 
Dexter Sinister

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
Chukcha said:
No, I am simply asking the questions, nothing personal to you or anybody else. Can you answer them? No? Because we still haven't proven anything? I know that you haven't proven anything, I don't that though, I want to hear different answers. Can you???
Click to expand...
I cited just that little bit of your response in order to justify this: I find your response utterly incoherent, I have no idea how to respond. "I don't that though" for instance. There's at least one word missing from that clause, and I haven't a clue what it is or what you mean. And "...I want to hear different answers. Can you???" Can I what? You've lost me entirely.
 
Chukcha

Chukcha

Electoral Member
Sep 19, 2006
215
1
18
Dexter Sinister said:
I cited just that little bit of your response in order to justify this: I find your response utterly incoherent, I have no idea how to respond. "I don't that though" for instance. There's at least one word missing from that clause, and I haven't a clue what it is or what you mean. And "...I want to hear different answers. Can you???" Can I what? You've lost me entirely.
Click to expand...
WTF???
rephrase pls. too many words for my little brain.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom