Based on what exactly? I've NEVER seen any psychology paper implying that a mother causes homosexuality.
:tard:
Where you from? Mars?
I think you guys speak about what you don't know. You just prove it.
Based on what exactly? I've NEVER seen any psychology paper implying that a mother causes homosexuality.
That doesn't matter because it's painfully obvious that you don't for a fact.:tard:
Where you from? Mars?
I think you guys speak about what you don't know. You just prove it.
:tard:
Where you from? Mars?
I think you guys speak about what you don't know. You just prove it.
Could not resist replying to this idiotic series of comments. I have a degree in Psychology, my irate friend, and I can assure you that modern Pyschological positions DO NOT match what you state they do.
Just a question, who the nazis killed with gaz?
Not this his Anti-Gay rhetoric is correct, but you should actually know the law before rhyming it off as fact.
****************************The courts have accepted that section 15 is to be interpreted broadly, and that “analogous” grounds, i.e., personal characteristics other than those listed, may also form the basis for discrimination against a group or an individual (Andrews v. Law Society of B.C.). In 1995, the view that sexual orientation is such an “analogous” ground, and therefore a prohibited ground of discrimination under the Charter, was confirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada in the Egan decision discussed below under the heading “Same-Sex Spouses.”Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
Relying on the Charter as the sole vehicle for the validation of equality rights may not provide a remedy in all cases. Even if discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation is recognized as a prima facie section 15 violation, a court may uphold the law as justifiable under section 1 of the Charter. Furthermore, the Charter’s constitutional guarantees apply only to governmental action, not private acts;
**********
So as a private act, him railing against Homosexual is perfectly legal.
You have a degree in nothing.
Any psychologist know this. You guy are either full of lies or full of ignorance.
And I have a question as well, what exactly do your comments have to do with homosexual "marriages"?
Is that so, I have a BA in Pyschology from the University of Windsor, an MA from the same University and a Diploma of Sacerdotal Ministry from Saint Andrews Seminary, so I do have some knowledge of the topic. And your professional qualifications in this area would be....???
Read the thread if you can't understand.
And if you read the thread and you can,t understand, go tell hitler, he will do something bad with you.
Rather difficult to tell him anything, wouldn't you think, considering the man has been dead since 1945.
Bull****. You have nothing. If you had anything but a book read on the subject you would know a lot of homosexual is sick because of their mom.
Bull****. You have nothing. If you had anything but a book read on the subject you would know a lot of homosexual is sick because of their mom.
Well, this thread has exploded in the short time I was gone. This subject always seems to end up this way. I'm guessing PsyOp will have a timeout in the near future.