Bush plot to merge Canada, the U.S. and Mexico

silky

Electoral Member
Nov 24, 2006
101
0
16
z4.invisionfree.com
What link?

I work in capital markets. If this was imminent, I'd be hearing it all the time from credible people, not just from conspiracists on the Internet who don't know the difference between a bond and a bon-bon.

I didn't say it was imminent, maybe in the next 2 or 3 years.

Bull, I really don't mean to be arguementive, however, before you try to totally debunk this issue on NAU you really need to do some research, granted one has to dig, and you'll find it's there. David Rockerfeller and company (CFR) is behind it all with his grand vision.

As far as spelling Florida goes ... granted you got me on a typo I stand corrected, hope you feel better. You're right about bonds, they are much more complicated than someone telling you it's just like a mortgage, it's not! Then throw in derivates and if one sneezes all that info is lost :) ... just a bit of humor. What I am trying to say is this: it's all very complex and leaves one very insecure about their portfolio.

I'm invested in bond funds like Pimco and Fidelity which are doing quite well right now. Gold is another good field during unsure times. Regarding the site maybe it was dropped try:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=18564

If I missed spelled anything please forgive me. Will paste the article:


Could the Dollar's Collapse Prompt a New Currency?

by Jerome R. Corsi
Posted Dec 20, 2006

A large and growing trade deficit with China under NAFTA threatens a dollar decline that could well set the stage for the emergence of the Amero as a unified North American currency.

In 2005, the U.S. balance of trade deficit with China was $201 billion, a 25% increase over 2004. In 2006, China’s foreign exchange reserves topped $1 trillion, a staggering amount considering that before 1979 China’s foreign exchange reserves had never surpassed $1 billion. Approximately 70% of China’s foreign exchange reserves, some $700 billion, are held in U.S. dollars, about half of which are invested in long-term Treasury bonds that in turn fund our federal budget deficits. Prior to Thanksgiving 2006, China’s central banks suggested a possible move to diversify foreign exchange holdings away from the dollar. As a consequence, the dollar sold off on world currency markets, hitting a new 20-month low against the Euro, a currency which is beginning to compete with the dollar as an international foreign reserve currency.

In the recent top-level cabinet officer meeting held in Beijing, U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said that China had pledged to allow a greater extent of rate flexibility on the Chinese RMB (the Yuan), but refused to give a timetable for achieving that objective. Since July 1, 2005, China has allowed the Yuan to fluctuate within a narrow range, pegged to a basket of international currencies. Still, China has consistently refused to allow its currency to float freely on international currency markets. In his Beijing speech, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke’s prepared text accused China of maintaining an undervalued currency on purpose, in order to provide an effective subsidy to Chinese firms that export their goods. In delivering the speech, Bernanke decided to moderate this criticism, noting only that a stronger Yuan would reduce “the incentive for Chinese firms to focus on exporting.” The December 2006 cabinet-level meetings in China showed progress, but no definite results.

Meanwhile, on December 15, while Paulson was in China, the Treasury issued the 2006 Financial Report of the United States as released by the U.S. Department of Treasury, which reported that the 2006 federal budget deficit was $4.6 trillion, not a previously reported $248.2 billion. The difference is that the typical Treasury Department report of the federal budget deficit is on a cash basis where all tax receipts are applied when received to current liabilities, whereas the Financial Report of the United States is calculated on a GAAP basis (“Generally Accepted Accounting Practices”) accruals are made for current year changes in the net present value of unfunded liabilities in social insurance programs such as Social Security and Medicare. The report also showed that the GAAP accounted negative net worth of the federal government has increased to $53.1 trillion, while the total federal obligations under GAAP accounting now total $54.6 trillion, taking into account the present value of future Social Security and Medicare liabilities. Put simply, the 2006 Financial Report of the United States shows that arguments that the U.S. government is bankrupt have increasing merit.

Currently, we are experiencing an inverted yield curve in which long-term interest rates are lower than short-term interest rates, a condition that many economists feel predicts slower economic growth in the first half of 2007. The U.S. GDP grew at a rate of 2.2% in the third quarter 2006, the weakest pace since late 2005. If the housing market bubble bursts in 2007, the U.S. could experience an economic slowdown in 2007. Facing continuing trade and budget deficits in 2007, the task before Treasury Secretary Paulson is how to engineer a gradual dollar decline rather that an abrupt drop in value that could signal a dollar collapse.

Meanwhile, Robert Pastor of American University gave an interview in Spanish in October 2006 in which he suggested that a 9/11 crisis might be just the type of catastrophe needed to overcome governmental inertia in advancing the type of economic integration necessary to form a North American Community. In a subsequent interview, Pastor affirmed that the Spanish interview did represent his thinking. “What I’m saying is that a crisis is an event which can force democratic governments to make difficult decisions like those that will be required to create a North American Community,” Pastor said. “It’s not that I want another 9/11 crisis, but having a crisis would force decisions that otherwise might not get made.” As we have previously documented, Robert Pastor, who we have called “The Father of the North American Union,” has provided much of the intellectual justification behind the push toward a merger between the U.S., Mexico, and Canada.

Paulson, in China, displayed customary confidence that any dollar devaluation could be handled gradually, on a systematic basis. Yet, the cabinet-level summit meeting ended with no concrete plan in place that shows promise of slowing the growing trade deficit with China. How strong will the dollar be when China holds $2 trillion in foreign exchange reserves, of which $1.5 trillion is held in U.S. dollars?

Nor, with the 110th Congress beginning in January 2007 with a Democratic majority, do we have any reason to believe we will see a sudden return to fiscal discipline in spending and entitlement programs. The Democrats systematically defeated President Bush’s attempt to put the issue of Social Security reform on the table following his 2004 re-election victory. How huge will deficits in the GAAP accounted federal deficit budgets be if Hillary Clinton should become president in 2008 and succeed in adding universal health care to the Social Security and Medicare liabilities we are already accruing.

So far, we have been managing huge and growing double deficits in the federal budget and our trade balances by cash accounting in the federal budget. Still, we have not reserved anything for the present value of future Social Security and Medicare payouts accruing now. A solution to paying huge future obligations would be to monetize the debt, allowing the dollar to drop in value dramatically, so future liabilities could be paid off in dramatically devalued dollars.

What Robert Pastor suggests is that in the event of a national crisis, such as could be envisioned in a sudden dollar collapse, we will experience another push toward North American integration. In the process of revaluing into a new North American Community currency, all three countries could take the opportunity to recalculate future unfunded government obligations in the value of a newly defined unitary monetary unit.

Prior to 9/11, surrenders of individual freedoms such as we have witnessed in the Patriot Act would have been unimaginable. In a fiscal 9/11 crisis triggered by a dollar collapse, Dr. Pastor could well be right. The Amero might then look reasonable, under the argument that we will need continental resources to compete with the Euro as a reserve currency and with the Yuan, especially when China seems resistant to a freely floating currency.
Copyright © 2006 HUMAN EVENTS. All Rights Reserved.
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
Looks like the folks have started "celebrating" a bit early here.....

Are there any red tinfoil hats available for Xmas???


Tinfoil in disguise
 
Last edited:

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
I didn't say it was imminent, maybe in the next 2 or 3 years.
We were hearing about the euro loud and clear more than 2-3 years before its implementation. If there was any such Amero, it would be the talk of the capital markets.

But there is no talk at all. None. Zero. Zip. Nada.

And with literally $2 trillion traded each and every day in the currency markets by people including those who literally were rocket scientists with Ph.D.s in physics before entering the world of finance, the replacement of the single most important currency on the planet would be of more than a little interest.

But for some reason, the only people who seem to believe this will happen are conspiracists on the Internet.

leaves one very insecure about their portfolio.

I'm invested in bond funds like Pimco and Fidelity which are doing quite well right now. Gold is another good field during unsure times.

If you believe that the dollar is going to collapse, you shouldn't own bonds because they will collapse too.

As for the article, the "true" deficit is not $4.6 trillion, even with social security and medicare liabilities. Why? Because at any time, the government can abrogate or change the terms of the social contracts with the stroke of a pen.

A devaluation is a whole lot different than a "collapse". The yen rose 2000% against the dollar for a few decades during Japan's rapid economic development. But - surprisingly - the dollar is still around!
 

silky

Electoral Member
Nov 24, 2006
101
0
16
z4.invisionfree.com

If you believe that the dollar is going to collapse, you shouldn't own bonds because they will collapse too.

As for the article, the "true" deficit is not $4.6 trillion, even with social security and medicare liabilities. Why? Because at any time, the government can abrogate or change the terms of the social contracts with the stroke of a pen.

A devaluation is a whole lot different than a "collapse". !

Where did I say the dollar will collapse? Devaluation is already happening, and that is what will continue to happen for a period of time until the extreme wealthy start to balk.

Don't know if I posted this previously or not:

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53124

Posted: November 28, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

In an interview with CNBC, a vice president for a prominent London investment firm yesterday urged a move away from the dollar to the "amero," a coming North American currency, he said, that "will have a big impact on everybody's life, in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico."

Steve Previs, a vice president at Jefferies International Ltd., explained the Amero "is the proposed new currency for the North American Community which is being developed right now between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico."
The aim, he said, according to a transcript provided by CNBC to WND, is to make a "borderless community, much like the European Union, with the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar and the Mexican peso being replaced by the amero."
Previs told the television audience many Canadians are "upset" about the amero. Most Americans outside of Texas largely are unaware of the amero or the plans to integrate North America, Previs observed, claiming many are just "putting their head in the sand" over the plans.

CNBC asked Previs whether he thought NAFTA was "working and doing enough."

He replied: "Until it created a lot of illegal immigrants coming across the border. I don't know. You get the pros and cons on NAFTA. For some people it is a good thing, and for other people it has been a disaster."

The speculation on the future of a new North American currency came amid a major U.S. dollar sell-off worldwide that began last week.

Yesterday, the dollar also reached new multi-month low against the euro, breaking through the $1.30 per euro technical high that had held since April 2005.

At the same time, the Chinese central bank set the yuan at 7.0402 per dollar, the highest level since Beijing established a new currency exchange system in 2005 that severed China's previous policy of tying the value of the yuan to the U.S. dollar.

Many analysts worldwide attributed the dramatic fall in the value of the U.S. dollar at least partially to China's announcement last week that it would seek to diversify its foreign exchange currency holdings away from the U.S. dollar. China recently has crossed the threshold of holding $1 trillion in U.S. dollar foreign-exchange reserves, surpassing Japan as the largest holder in the world.

Barry Ritholtz, chief market strategist for Ritholtz Research & Analytics in New York City, in a phone interview with WND, characterized today's downward move of the dollar as "wackage," a new word he coined to convey that the dollar is being "whacked" in this current market movement.

Ritholtz told WND that yesterday's downward move "was a major market correction that points to the risk of subsequent downside to the dollar."

Asked whether he would characterize the dollar's downside move as signaling a possible collapse, Mr Ritholtz told WND, "Not yet."

Ritholtz pointed out market professionals had long looked at a dollar collapse as a "low probability event," but the recent fall suggests "the probabilities have increased of a major dollar correction, or even of a collapse."

U.S. trade imbalances with China have hit a record $228 billion this year, largely reflecting a surging flow of containers from China with retail goods headed for the U.S. mass market.

Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez is in Bejing leading a trade delegation of more than two dozen U.S. business executives.

"The future should be focused on exporting to China," Guiterrez told reporters in Bejing, noting that this year, U.S. exports to China are up 34 percent on a year-to-year basis, surpassing last year's gain of 20 percent.

One way to improve the U.S. trade imbalance may be to ease up on restrictions of exporting high-tech products and allowing technology transfers to China, a move likely to be politically charged in the U.S.

The decline in value of the dollar will also make U.S. exports more attractive and Chinese exports to the U.S. more expensive.

In February 2007, a virtually unprecedented top-level U.S. economic mission is scheduled to travel to China. Included in the mission are Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Jr., Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.

Previs declined to be interviewed for this article, telling WND in an e-mail he did not want to be quoted directly in any article that may express a political point of view.
 

Toro

Senate Member
May 24, 2005
5,468
109
63
Florida, Hurricane Central
Where did I say the dollar will collapse?


The article you posted talked about a dollar collapse. That is what is supposed to precipitate the creation of the Amero

As for devaluation, well, the economies of Japan and Europe are not strong enough to absorb a dramatic devaluation. The dollar is still higher against the yen than it was 10-15 years ago when it hit Y85. The dollar is slightly weaker against the euro than when it was launched in 1999 and had appreciated 40% against the euro and other European currencies in the latter half of the 1990s. The loonie has round-tripped the greenback, hitting $0.91 in the late 1980s before collapsing to $0.62 in the late 1990s to $0.90 this year.

No big deal.

Until today, when I sold the last of my holdings (if only temporarily), I had held gold and gold stocks for most of the past five years because I could see this dollar devaluation coming. However, that does not mean I think the dollar will be replaced by a continental-wide currency.
 
Last edited:

silky

Electoral Member
Nov 24, 2006
101
0
16
z4.invisionfree.com
The article you posted talked about a dollar collapse. That is what is supposed to precipitate the creation of the Amero

As for devaluation, well, the economies of Japan and Europe are not strong enough to absorb a dramatic devaluation. The dollar is still higher against the yen than it was 10-15 years ago when it hit Y85. The dollar is slightly weaker against the euro than when it was launched in 1999 and had appreciated 40% against the euro and other European currencies in the latter half of the 1990s. The loonie has round-tripped the greenback, hitting $0.91 in the late 1980s before collapsing to $0.62 in the late 1990s to $0.90 this year.

No big deal.

Until today, when I sold the last of my holdings (if only temporarily), I had held gold and gold stocks for most of the past five years because I could see this dollar devaluation coming. However, that does not mean I think the dollar will be replaced by a continental-wide currency.

Good post. Congrats on your run up of gold during the past five years.

Merry Christmas, I've got to get back to wrapping packages, and will not post till next year due to holidays. Hope all of you have a Happy and Prosperous New Year.
 
Last edited:

normbc9

Electoral Member
Nov 23, 2006
483
14
18
California
While all of the craftyed diversions take place this nefarious scheme continues to escalate behing closed US Congress dooors with many finger prints on the dagger. The CFR continues to pour huge amounts of money into this bad nightmare and for the obvious reasons of personal profit. I sure hope the Canadian and Mexican citizens see throught this scheme for what it really is. The US has developed into a global octopus and is trying any way it can to gain global dominance.
 

silky

Electoral Member
Nov 24, 2006
101
0
16
z4.invisionfree.com
Bush plot to merge Canada, the U.S. and Mexico Reply to Thread

While all of the craftyed diversions take place this nefarious scheme continues to escalate behing closed US Congress dooors with many finger prints on the dagger. The CFR continues to pour huge amounts of money into this bad nightmare and for the obvious reasons of personal profit. I sure hope the Canadian and Mexican citizens see throught this scheme for what it really is. The US has developed into a global octopus and is trying any way it can to gain global dominance.

Norm, did you see today's article in WorldNetDaily? Please go to the site for the entire article, I will post the first few paragraphs below.

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53599

INVASION USA
Social Security billions could go to Mexicans
Critics say benefits would lure illegals to U.S. while giving employers marginal help
Posted: January 2, 2007
11:44 p.m. Eastern

© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

An organization of retirees has announced the release, after three years of arguments and a Freedom of Information request, by the Social Security Administration of a copy of the first known public copy of the U.S.-Mexico Social Security Totalization Agreement.

The TREA Senior Citizens League said the document reveals what was expected, a huge threat to the future of Social Security, because any Mexican worker who has as little as 18 months of employment history in the United States could end up qualifying for some Social Security retirement benefits.

The organization of retirees, whose leaders have tried to convince Congress to prevent Social Security benefits from being awarded for work done by people in the United States illegally, said the exact financial impact cannot be calculated immediately, because the number of illegals working in the country isn't clear.

But with estimates ranging to 20 million illegals in the country, even a portion of them qualifying for Social Security benefits could move the costs into the range of billions quickly.
 

silky

Electoral Member
Nov 24, 2006
101
0
16
z4.invisionfree.com
Another good observance: http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53601

Here, with our readers' help, are WorldNetDaily editors' picks for the 10 most underreported stories of 2006:

1. Plans under way for North American Union: While most Americans consider their nation's unsecured borders and the resulting flood of illegal immigrants to be among the country's most dire problems, the U.S. government – inexplicably – is engaged in progressively de-emphasizing those borders while integrating the U.S., Mexico and Canada into a North American "superstate."

Although most in the media regard the notion of a merger agenda as sheer conspiracy theory, an increasing number of high-level voices – including congressmen like Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul, and newsmen like CNN's Lou Dobbs who calls the government's actions on this issue "unconscionable" and "Orwellian" – are sounding the alarm over recent moves in the direction of a de facto North American Union.

For example, confirmation has surfaced that the U.S. government will indeed provide full Social Security benefits to Mexicans – which critics predict will bankrupt the already-shaky system. And a report by the powerful Council on Foreign Relations, regarded by many as something of a "shadow government," has called for a massive transfer of wealth from the U.S. to Mexico and the establishment of a "security perimeter" around North America – rather than securing America's borders with Mexico and Canada.


WND tells the whole story, as it's never been told before (including the possibility of a new North American currency, the "amero") in the January 2007 edition of its acclaimed Whistleblower magazine, titled "PREMEDITATED MERGER: How our leaders are stealthily transforming the U.S.A. into the North American Union."

2. Wave of murders and other crimes by illegal aliens: Though most of the media don't report it as such, and no government agencies are keeping tabs on it, there is an explosion of crime in the United States attributable to illegal aliens.

Last month, for instance, WND reported that more Americans were murdered this year by illegal aliens than the combined death toll of U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan since those military campaigns began.

In another disturbing expose, WND reported that a wave of illegal-immigrant gang rapes is sweeping the U.S. while public officials and law-enforcement authorities fear drawing the link.

As Deborah Schurman-Kauflin, a Ph.D. researcher of violent crimes, told WorldNetDaily: "It appears as if there is a fear that if this is honestly discussed, people will hate all illegal immigrants. So there is silence. … But in being silent about the rapes and murders, it is as if the victims never even existed."

Even on the nation's highways, record high numbers of unlicensed, unregistered, uninsured drivers – many of whom are illegal aliens – are driving up the numbers of highway deaths in the U.S.
 

silky

Electoral Member
Nov 24, 2006
101
0
16
z4.invisionfree.com
And for those of you who think NAU is conspiracy hysteria ... then Arizona State University must be teaching conspiracy hysteria:

Please see link: http://www.asu.edu/clas/nacts/bna/
Please go to the site for embedded links to other organizations and sites.

Copied from the front page:

Teaching Modules: Backgrounders and Cases
Building North America Into Your Course
North American Economic Integration: General Overview
Analyzing North American Integration
Managing North America
North American Structures and ¨Sites¨of Integration
Continental Strategies of Selected North American Companies
 

silky

Electoral Member
Nov 24, 2006
101
0
16
z4.invisionfree.com
Sorry for so many post, but the holidays are over and its back to the business of trying to stop the NAU. I really doubt that Canadians have any idea of what will happen to their culture when the poor, uneducated, criminal, and illegal Mexican invasion happens on your land. I am only a messenger, so please don't kill the messenger.

From http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/cover010307.htm (The site has the complete article)

Illegal immigration, amnesty, European Union

The North America Union's Mexico Connection

By Judi McLeod

Wednesday, January 3, 2007

Mexico is sitting pretty in the event of the formation of a North American Union (NAU). Its Third World status would be wiped off the slate in the NAU.

That's because the United States of America has already absorbed millions of Mexicans and millions more keep pouring over the border.

"In a letter dated February 2004, no less an authority than Arizona Senator John McCain recognized that Border Patrol apprehension figures demonstrated that "almost four million people crossed our borders illegally (in) 2002—experts on the subject agree that illegal crossings have only increased since then." www.theamericanresistance.com.

"The Tucson sector Border Patrol union Local 2544 on the number of illegal aliens in our nation: "There are currently 15 to 20 million illegal aliens in this country by many estimates, but the real numbers could be much higher and the numbers increase every day because our borders are not secure (no matter what the politicians tell you—don't believe them for a second)."

"In agreement with Senator McCain, our counters are calibrated to reflect an increase of 10,000 total additional illegal aliens added to the United States population each day.

Is the NAU the political answer for amnesty?

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPPNA) sounds innocuous. Ditto for the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).
 
Last edited:

silky

Electoral Member
Nov 24, 2006
101
0
16
z4.invisionfree.com
http://newsbyus.com/more.php?id=6607_0_1_0_M

Thousands of Illegal Aliens Preying on Children
By Jim Kouri, CPP on Jan 03, 07

Top officials at the Department of Homeland Security had announced that arrests during the first two years of Operation Predator, an initiative aimed at foreign nationals who prey on children, have exceeded 6,000.

The majority of the arrests under Operation Predator—roughly 85%—have involved foreign nationals in this country whose child sex crimes make them eligible for removal from the United States. By matching immigration databases with state Megan’s law directories, Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have arrested more than 1,800 registered sex offenders.

With federal, state and local law enforcement working together, the initiative has resulted in 6,085 child predator arrests throughout the country—an average of roughly 250 arrests per month and eight arrests per day. While arrests have been made in every state, most have occurred in these states: Arizona (207), California 1,578, Florida (255), Illinois (282), Michigan (153), Minnesota (190), New Jersey (423), New York (367), Oregon 148 and Texas (545).

“We are seeing an alarming number of illegal aliens with criminal records for everything from homicides to rapes of children as young as three years of age,” states former NYPD Detective Sid Francis, who investigated sex crimes in New York City.

Research in the area of child pedators is disturbing and, at times, out and out shocking. Det. Francis studied arrest reports involving criminal aliens who committed child sex crimes including Julio Cesar Rabago-Magana, a Mexican man who sexually assaulted a four-year-old child in a basement in Minneapolis, Minn. Rabago-Magana pleaded guilty to first-degree criminal sexual conduct. After serving his criminal sentence, he was arrested by Immigration agents at his St. Paul home and deported six days later.

“The illegal immigration problem is allowing hundreds of thousands of criminal aliens to invade our nation and kill, maim, rob and abuse our citizens, “ warns the one of the vice presidents of the 14,000-member National Association of Chiefs of Police. Research revealed that in one 9-month period the federal government arrested over 100,000 criminal aliens. These arrests do not include arrests made by state and local law enforcement.

Det. Francis adds that our political leaders and the mainstream news media practically ignore this issue and pro-llegal immigration advocates resort to name-calling to silence anyone who attempts to sound the alarm.

“If anything, the President and the two houses of Congress are actually helping these fiends enter the US to assault citizens and their children. They appear more intent on locking up border patrol agents that stopping illegal alien thugs.”
 
Last edited:

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
I can't see anything different than we have now except that instead of other criminals and illegal aliens invading Canada, we'd have Mexicans, too. I'd make a bet that the number of illegals in Canada outnumbers the Canadian military personel as it is. And the only ones that the CIC seems to be interested in deporting are the ones that are easy to catch: that'd be the ones that want to become legal in the first place whose visas have expired or whatever. The entire CIC needs to be uprooted and shipped out of Canada so we can concern ourselves with the people that really are criminal.
Canadians aren't even alike from province to province (or region to region) anyway, and neither are Mexicans and Americans. If Mexico or the States think we'd all get along any better after the borders disappear, they're foolish.
 

silky

Electoral Member
Nov 24, 2006
101
0
16
z4.invisionfree.com
I can't see anything different than we have now except that instead of other criminals and illegal aliens invading Canada, we'd have Mexicans, too. I'd make a bet that the number of illegals in Canada outnumbers the Canadian military personel as it is. And the only ones that the CIC seems to be interested in deporting are the ones that are easy to catch: that'd be the ones that want to become legal in the first place whose visas have expired or whatever. The entire CIC needs to be uprooted and shipped out of Canada so we can concern ourselves with the people that really are criminal.
Canadians aren't even alike from province to province (or region to region) anyway, and neither are Mexicans and Americans. If Mexico or the States think we'd all get along any better after the borders disappear, they're foolish.

Gilbert:
The other day I came across some satistic of population count in CA, US, and MX.
CA = 32 or so million
US = 300 million
MX = 109 million

The rough estimate of illegal aliens from MX in the US is 20 million and probably 10 million (conservative figure) anchor babies, that means the US has as many illegal alien from MX as the entire population of Canadian citizens in Canada.:cry:
 

silky

Electoral Member
Nov 24, 2006
101
0
16
z4.invisionfree.com
What's an anchor baby?

Description from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain_migration

Anchor baby is a pejorative term used to refer to a child born in the United States to illegal immigrants or other non-citizens. The term refers to a resident alien's child's role in facilitating "chain migration" under the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Services Act of 1965. Nativists claim that the baby would become the "anchor" of a chain by which its family may receive benefits from social programs, and by which that family's members may themselves eventually become citizens of the United States. The term "anchor babies" is also used to refer to children born to women who are legally in the US on temporary visas (for example a visitor’s visa) when the child's birth is specifically intended to obtain citizenship under US law, however, this is more precisely described as birth tourism. Sometimes the term jackpot baby is used interchangeably with the term anchor baby, and this use is also derogatory.

Chain migration refers to the mechanism by which foreign nationals are allowed to immigrate by virtue of the ability of previous adult immigrants who gain citizenship to send for their adult relatives.

In the United States, chain migration is supposed by many to be one of many reasons that legal immigration has quadrupled from levels during the 1960s. As such, it is one of the causes of the United States' current immigrant population boom. However, number of immigrants per native-born citizen still has not reached levels of the 1880s to 1910s, when over 13% of the population was foreign born. See Immigration_to_the_United_States

Until the late 1950s, America's chain migration policies included only spouses and minor children of immigrants.
However, ever since the late 1950's, chain migration policies of the United States have included the ability for immigrants to not only send for their children and spouses, but also for their parents and adult children of their parents. Theoretically, those parents and adult children, in turn, can send for their children, their parents (assuming great-grandparents of the original immigrant are alive, willing and able to migrate), and adult children of these lucky great-grandparents.
 
Last edited: