Bush plot to merge Canada, the U.S. and Mexico
- Thread starter #juan
- Start date
The Anti-Christ will be the Ceaser.
Its all Biblical, but besides that Nostra Domus has Perdicted the happingings also. Iam one to roll with Punches. Ill be happy if we can still keepthe name Canada, and Canadians. Its going to happen and no one has guts to fight it. It could be a decent thing to solve problems on earth, for the time being but, as far as I know its only going to bring much more problems later on.
End of the world....2007 TO 2012 Thats the Nastradumus TIMELINE.
If the world doesnt end however it may be an alright thing....but a one world government, will be very bad, people will have less of a say, people in are now 3rd world countries will have even less of a say, and it will be a managment issue.....unless of course, we get our plauges and floodings predicted in the bible, and our fire fromt he heavens to whipe out a nice section of humanity....who knows all I know it, when it happens it happens ill be sitting on the side of the fence that will want Canada back, and want our own government back....
The world as we know it. Not necessarily as in the end (kaboom)
[edit] Apocalyptic beliefs about 2012
2012 is sometimes claimed to be a year of spiritual transformation (or apocalypse). Many esoteric sources interpret the completion of the thirteenth B'ak'tun cycle in the Long Count of the Maya calendar (which occurs on December 21 by the most widely held correlation) to mean there will be a major change in world order, although there is a distinct lack of evidence from the extant records of the pre-Columbian Maya civilization that they themselves considered this occurrence in 2012 would signify end of the world.
Accordingly, several eclectic authors claim that a major, world-changing event will take place in 2012:
- The 1995 book The Mayan Prophecies linked the Maya calendar with long-period sunspot cycles.
- The book 2012:Mayan Year of Destiny claims the Maya may have been instructed in their wisdom by discarnate entities from Orion and the Pleiades. Contact was maintained through shamanic rituals conducted in accordance with the movements of planets and stars.
- The 1997 book The Bible Code claims that, according to certain algorithms of the Bible code, a meteor, asteroid or comet will collide with the Earth.
- The book The Nostradamus Code speaks of a series of natural disasters caused by a comet (possibly as above) which will allow the third anti-christ to disperse his troops around the globe under the guise of aid in preparation for a nuclear war.
- The book The Orion Prophecy claims that the Earth's magnetic field will reverse.
- The 2006 book 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl by Daniel Pinchbeck discusses theories of a possible global awakening to psychic connection by the year 2012, creating a Noosphere. It also discusses many other aspects of the 2012 phenomenon from a neutral perspective.
- Terence McKenna's mathematical novelty theory predicts a point of singularity in which humankind will go through a great shift in consciousness.
- The Prophecy of the Popes, attributed to Saint Malachy, speculated that Pope Benedict XVI would reign during the beginning of the tribulation of which Jesus spoke, and sometime later a future pope described in the prophecy as "Peter the Roman", the last in this prophetic list, would appear, bringing as a result the destruction of the city of Rome and the Last Judgement.
- Many new age spiritualists and philosophers ("new-agers") believe humankind will enter an age of enlightenment in 2012.[citation needed] There are a range of varying, generally positive, beliefs shared by a subset of spiritualists from the mundane to exceptional -- including a positive social shift and age of peace, mankind becoming psychic and connected by a collective, and/or an evolution of the human race into non-corporeal beings made of "spiritual" energy, or light energy.[citation needed] An alternative view is that we are already thought-forms (see also idealism) and will be realizing our true selves in this year.[citation needed]
- Some alien-enthusiasts, along with some new-agers, believe 2012 to correspond approximately with the return of alien "watchers" or "caretakers" who might have helped the first human civilizations with developing their technology and may have been waiting for us to reach a higher level of technological and/or social advancement.[citation needed] Beliefs range from the extra-terrestrials having benevolent purposes -- such as to help human society evolve -- to malevolent purposes -- such as enslavement of mankind and/or manipulation.[citation needed]
- The ascetic Buddhist monk Ram Bahadur Bomjon reportedly told his followers that he will return around 2012.
- Some proponents of a peak oil catastrophe place major events in 2012. Richard C. Duncan's book The Peak of World Oil Production and the Road To The Olduvai Gorge claims that the Olduvai cliff will begin and permanent blackouts will occur worldwide. Several studies predict a peak in oil production in or around 2012. [8][9][10]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012
oh brother...I quit!!!ukeright:
Tis' getting a bit out there. :wink: I really don't think the Mayan contribution has much creditability from the movie I just walked out on two days ago by Mel Gibson, Apocalypto, grossly violent. I will stick to more immediate forms of threats from oligarchy cabal like David Rockefeller and Council of Foreign Relations:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Rockefeller
You got the correct meaning...
There's a difference between helping a brother and being coerced.
If the American People need help, we help.......Period.....It's a matter of honour
Last edited:
I came very late to this thread. I am all for it. Let us unite as the country of North America,maybe it will work. I know many of you are rolling your eyes because of the anti-america feelings. Now just close those eyes and run "imagine" through your brain. Particularily the line" imagine a world with no countries". Feel good,this would be the first step.
Let's not go too far too fast..
Three countries are fine the way they.
The American People are the ones under debt pressure, and they need the opportunity to be who they can....Fine....But some form of consolidation is out of the question, in my view..
Maybe yes ,maybe no. Twenty years ago .who would have imagined the EU.Personally,I am part murrican,mostly canuck,but am drawn towards petite brown women with limited english. It's all good. "yes sir,is that ever big".
As we enter the Age of Ideas, I believe localized governments will emerge under the existing nations. To maintain cultural diversity requires it..
The American People should have the opportunity to self determination, but self determination requires self sufficiency in terms of its balance sheet..
Printing gobs of paper to indenture the country for luxury when you can't supply your own pots and pans makes little sense.It's a fool's game....
Economic transition and renewal is the order of the day, in my view...
The speech from Dubya was no more than concluded when the CFR directed its minions to put up anothr two hundred million to keep this effort alive. It isn't about people or harmony. It's about nraw uncontrolled power. Look at history and see where anything like this propsed ever turned out right. How about the Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere in 1934 or The Europen countries unified under Russia?? Bad mistakes and big failures causing undo harm to all peoples.
Bush plot to merge Canada, the U.S. and Mexico Reply to Thread
:wave:
Interesting new article today:
http://www.aim.org/aim_report_print/5102_0_4_0/
AIM Report: U.S. Borders: Going-Going-Gone! - December B
December 22, 2006
Some experts say that up to a million people in Texas stand to lose their homes and 584,000 acres of rich farm and ranchland are to be destroyed, all for a privately funded highway.
By Wes Vernon*
Readers of the AIM Report are accustomed to learning of huge distortions or omissions by the media. This time, the under-reported story deals with the possible end of America, as we know it.
Major players are secretive and are trying to keep the media out of the loop. But that does not let the mainstream media off the hook. There is enough stonewalling, secrecy and there are plenty of telltale signs, so that any assignment editor whose curiosity is not aroused is probably in the wrong business.
But in terms of the national media, only Lou Dobbs of CNN has blown the whistle on a scheme whereby a North American "Security and Prosperity Partnership," being implemented by the Department of Commerce, could pave the way for a transnational entity called the North American Union.
The implications of this scheme are staggering. Some experts say that up to a million people in Texas stand to lose their homes and 584,000 acres of rich farm and ranchland are to be destroyed, all for a privately funded highway. Of course, this is not the first time property-owners did battle with highway builders. That in itself is getting lots of media attention, but almost entirely in the regional/local media. At first glance, one might say this is a local story, so why should it go national?
But suppose you were told that this "highway" (to be built largely by foreign investors) could serve as the starting point for a much larger plan whose end result would be to erase the borders (figuratively if not literally) between the United States, Mexico, and Canada? Wouldn't you be curious, no matter where you live? The national media isn't interested.
The Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) is its official name. Critics call it the NAFTA Highway. The publicized TTC is being treated as a regional story because of the disruption to Texas farmers and other property owners.
The TTC is no ordinary highway. The toll road would be four football fields wide. It includes separate lanes (up to six for automobiles, four for large trucks), plus tracks for freight trains, separate tracks for high-speed and commuter rail, also space for oil and gas pipelines, electricity wires, and broadband transmission cables.
The Associated Press (AP) has carried regional stories focused on the Texas politics of the TTC highway—the anger of the farmers and other property owners likely to get their Kelo notices soon now that the election is over. Kelo is the U.S. Supreme Court decision that said it was okay for government to take your home away from you if some big corporate hotel chain, strip mall contractor, or—in this case—foreign investor wants to build on your land and create a fatter tax base than what the government can get from ordinary home-owners.
But Freedom of Information (FOIA) e-mails suggest the TTC is but one part of the drive for a North American Union—not unlike the European Union. The vehicle for that is the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), housed in the Department of Commerce in Washington.
The Council on Foreign Relations constantly promotes the SPP and supported the conference that created it. That trilateral meeting in Waco, Texas in March of 2005 ended in a handshake between President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin.
A press release was all that was issued. Any formal treaty would have required ratification by the United States Senate. None was written and submitted to the Senate.
Hidden Agenda
The SPP is very secretive about the 20 "working groups" it has spawned where bureaucrats from the U.S., Canada, and Mexico are rewriting proposals for our laws, regulations and trade agreements whose ultimate effect would be to create a North American Union.
AIM e-mailed the SPP asking where and when the "working groups" were meeting. Who are their members? What rules, laws, regulations, and agreements were they re-writing? What is their content?
Trying to penetrate the layers of bureaucracy to get to the SPP office can put one's patience to the ultimate test. Telephone inquiries get the runaround, and e-mail requests for information are ignored. A Commerce spokeswoman did tell investigative author Jerome Corsi the working groups "do not wish to be distracted by calls from the public." That sounds like code language for an attempt to keep it hush-hush as long as possible because they know there would be an uproar otherwise.
Where's Congress?
All these meetings are going on without any congressional hearings demanding answers as to the wisdom, legality or constitutionality of any of the proposals. Before our borders virtually disappear, Congress has a constitutional responsibility to be in on the ground floor. The SPP says it is keeping members of Congress informed as to what is going on.
So AIM e-mailed SPP requesting the names of the members of Congress who are in the loop. Again, no answer. Corsi, who is writing a book on this, says he has talked with many members of Congress in their offices, and by and large they were totally unaware of the undertaking.
A red flag should have been raised in Senate testimony by Dr. Robert Pastor, Vice Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Task Force on North America. Dr. Pastor was the Latin American specialist on Jimmy Carter's National Security Council. He was instrumental in the turnover—some called it a sellout—of the Panama Canal.
In fact, when President Clinton nominated Pastor in 1993 to be ambassador to Panama, his confirmation was effectively blocked by conservative Senator Jesse Helms, who charged the nominee was responsible for a "cover-up" of Sandinista Nicaragua's arms shipments to leftist terrorists in El Salvador.
Currently, Pastor advocates "economic integration" of the U.S., Canada, and Mexico and says their citizens should "think of themselves as North Americans." In an e-mail to AIM, he said he has had no formal connection with SPP or the 2005 trilateral conference, but that he offered his recommendations on North America to leaders of the three countries.
On infrastructure, Dr. Pastor told a subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee he favors "new North American highways and high-speed rail corridors."
The CFR guru cheerfully told the senators on June 9, 2005 that the North American Union would be helped by creating "a new consciousness among Americans." Shorn of the euphemisms, that could be taken to mean we must disabuse these Americans of their quaint notions of sovereignty.
No Border
Please go to the site for the remainder of the article, it was too large to enter here.
Normbc:
:wave:
Interesting new article today:
http://www.aim.org/aim_report_print/5102_0_4_0/
AIM Report: U.S. Borders: Going-Going-Gone! - December B
December 22, 2006
Some experts say that up to a million people in Texas stand to lose their homes and 584,000 acres of rich farm and ranchland are to be destroyed, all for a privately funded highway.
By Wes Vernon*
Readers of the AIM Report are accustomed to learning of huge distortions or omissions by the media. This time, the under-reported story deals with the possible end of America, as we know it.
Major players are secretive and are trying to keep the media out of the loop. But that does not let the mainstream media off the hook. There is enough stonewalling, secrecy and there are plenty of telltale signs, so that any assignment editor whose curiosity is not aroused is probably in the wrong business.
But in terms of the national media, only Lou Dobbs of CNN has blown the whistle on a scheme whereby a North American "Security and Prosperity Partnership," being implemented by the Department of Commerce, could pave the way for a transnational entity called the North American Union.
The implications of this scheme are staggering. Some experts say that up to a million people in Texas stand to lose their homes and 584,000 acres of rich farm and ranchland are to be destroyed, all for a privately funded highway. Of course, this is not the first time property-owners did battle with highway builders. That in itself is getting lots of media attention, but almost entirely in the regional/local media. At first glance, one might say this is a local story, so why should it go national?
But suppose you were told that this "highway" (to be built largely by foreign investors) could serve as the starting point for a much larger plan whose end result would be to erase the borders (figuratively if not literally) between the United States, Mexico, and Canada? Wouldn't you be curious, no matter where you live? The national media isn't interested.
The Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) is its official name. Critics call it the NAFTA Highway. The publicized TTC is being treated as a regional story because of the disruption to Texas farmers and other property owners.
The TTC is no ordinary highway. The toll road would be four football fields wide. It includes separate lanes (up to six for automobiles, four for large trucks), plus tracks for freight trains, separate tracks for high-speed and commuter rail, also space for oil and gas pipelines, electricity wires, and broadband transmission cables.
The Associated Press (AP) has carried regional stories focused on the Texas politics of the TTC highway—the anger of the farmers and other property owners likely to get their Kelo notices soon now that the election is over. Kelo is the U.S. Supreme Court decision that said it was okay for government to take your home away from you if some big corporate hotel chain, strip mall contractor, or—in this case—foreign investor wants to build on your land and create a fatter tax base than what the government can get from ordinary home-owners.
But Freedom of Information (FOIA) e-mails suggest the TTC is but one part of the drive for a North American Union—not unlike the European Union. The vehicle for that is the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), housed in the Department of Commerce in Washington.
The Council on Foreign Relations constantly promotes the SPP and supported the conference that created it. That trilateral meeting in Waco, Texas in March of 2005 ended in a handshake between President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin.
A press release was all that was issued. Any formal treaty would have required ratification by the United States Senate. None was written and submitted to the Senate.
Hidden Agenda
The SPP is very secretive about the 20 "working groups" it has spawned where bureaucrats from the U.S., Canada, and Mexico are rewriting proposals for our laws, regulations and trade agreements whose ultimate effect would be to create a North American Union.
AIM e-mailed the SPP asking where and when the "working groups" were meeting. Who are their members? What rules, laws, regulations, and agreements were they re-writing? What is their content?
Trying to penetrate the layers of bureaucracy to get to the SPP office can put one's patience to the ultimate test. Telephone inquiries get the runaround, and e-mail requests for information are ignored. A Commerce spokeswoman did tell investigative author Jerome Corsi the working groups "do not wish to be distracted by calls from the public." That sounds like code language for an attempt to keep it hush-hush as long as possible because they know there would be an uproar otherwise.
Where's Congress?
All these meetings are going on without any congressional hearings demanding answers as to the wisdom, legality or constitutionality of any of the proposals. Before our borders virtually disappear, Congress has a constitutional responsibility to be in on the ground floor. The SPP says it is keeping members of Congress informed as to what is going on.
So AIM e-mailed SPP requesting the names of the members of Congress who are in the loop. Again, no answer. Corsi, who is writing a book on this, says he has talked with many members of Congress in their offices, and by and large they were totally unaware of the undertaking.
A red flag should have been raised in Senate testimony by Dr. Robert Pastor, Vice Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) Task Force on North America. Dr. Pastor was the Latin American specialist on Jimmy Carter's National Security Council. He was instrumental in the turnover—some called it a sellout—of the Panama Canal.
In fact, when President Clinton nominated Pastor in 1993 to be ambassador to Panama, his confirmation was effectively blocked by conservative Senator Jesse Helms, who charged the nominee was responsible for a "cover-up" of Sandinista Nicaragua's arms shipments to leftist terrorists in El Salvador.
Currently, Pastor advocates "economic integration" of the U.S., Canada, and Mexico and says their citizens should "think of themselves as North Americans." In an e-mail to AIM, he said he has had no formal connection with SPP or the 2005 trilateral conference, but that he offered his recommendations on North America to leaders of the three countries.
On infrastructure, Dr. Pastor told a subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee he favors "new North American highways and high-speed rail corridors."
The CFR guru cheerfully told the senators on June 9, 2005 that the North American Union would be helped by creating "a new consciousness among Americans." Shorn of the euphemisms, that could be taken to mean we must disabuse these Americans of their quaint notions of sovereignty.
No Border
Please go to the site for the remainder of the article, it was too large to enter here.
rofl
I think the planet would do nicely without the likes of David Rockefeller and his plans for a new world order and all that one planet - one gov't bilgewater.
The single funniest point put forth by these bizarre assertions is the "Super Highway"
Where's the discussion about the impending implentation of the Amero!
:lol:
Where's the discussion about the impending implentation of the Amero!
:lol:
Last edited:
What's so funny about the Trans Texas Corridor ? Perhaps it's because you're in Flordia (if what you say is true about where you live).
See sites:
http://www.keeptexasmoving.org/flash/interactive_map/interactive.htm
http://www.corridorwatch.org/ttc/index.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Texas_Corridor
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51023
http://www.texastollparty.com/ttp_trans_texas.php
From the govt. which spins to their needs:
ukeright: http://www.governor.state.tx.us/priorities/transportation/ttc_factsheet/view
http://www.nctcog.org/trans/goods/ttc/