French PM wants to hit Canada with carbon tax

I think not

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 12, 2005
10,506
33
48
The Evil Empire
BILL CURRY


OTTAWA -- The Prime Minister of France is urging the European Union to impose a punitive import tax on goods from countries such as Canada that refuse to sign on to a tougher second phase of the global warming deal. Dominique de Villepin said countries that do not commit to new targets to cut greenhouse gas emissions should not be allowed to benefit by avoiding the costs associated with reducing global warming. He said France would make specific proposals for the European Union to discuss in the new year.
Environment Minister Rona Ambrose was not aware of the details of the French proposal, a spokesman said, but opposition MPs said it shows Canada is increasingly viewed as an environmental laggard on the world stage. An international law expert said such a tax would probably be rejected by the World Trade Organization because rules prevent foreign products from being treated differently from domestic ones.

But a spokesman for the French embassy in Ottawa said he was confident European Union lawyers could overcome that. The controversy comes as Canada faces criticism from Europe in particular for its acknowledgment that it will not meet its 2012 targets under the Kyoto Protocol for cutting greenhouse gas emissions. It also comes on the heels of Prime Minister Stephen Harper's decision to cancel a Canada-EU summit scheduled for Nov. 27 in Finland, where the Europeans planned to discuss climate change.
Liberal MP John Godfrey said the French proposal is generating discussion behind the scenes in Nairobi, Kenya, where world leaders are discussing a second phase to the Kyoto Protocol that would begin in 2012.
"I don't know, frankly, how seriously to take it," Mr. Godfrey said from Nairobi, noting that France is in an election year. He said it does show French politicians feel climate change is so important to voters that they would accept new import taxes.

NDP Leader Jack Layton seized on the French plan, describing it as a "wake-up call" to Mr. Harper.
"There are clearly some countries that are beginning to understand that the impacts of catastrophic climate change are so serious that truly extraordinary measures are going to have to be taken," he said.
Speaking Monday, the French Prime Minister expressed concern about the negotiations taking place in Nairobi. His tax proposal was presented as a way of getting hesitant countries on side. "Europe has to use all its weight to stand up to this sort of environmental dumping," Mr. de Villepin said, according to a text of his speech provided by the French embassy. "I would like us to study now with our European partners the principle of a carbon tax on the import of industrial products from countries that refuse to commit themselves to the Kyoto Protocol after 2012."

France has recently used new taxes for international issues. In July, the country imposed a departure tax at its airports to fund foreign aid and persuaded several European Union countries to follow suit.
Canada is one of 35 countries that ratified the Kyoto Protocol and made specific commitments to reduce greenhouse gases between 2008 and 2012. The thinking at the time was that those developed countries would set the example. The second phase was expected to involve deeper cuts for them, while other countries such as China would take on targets for the first time.

However, at a Kyoto-related meeting in Bonn in May, Canada adopted a new negotiating position by opposing tougher targets in the second phase. Canadian environmentalists and opposition leaders have been criticizing the Conservative government and Ms. Ambrose for continuing to chair Kyoto negotiations over the past year when it has acknowledged Canada will not meet its targets in the first phase. Ms. Ambrose's spokesman, Bob Klager, said yesterday the minister believes "there has been progress to date on the process for moving forward post-2012 and she's looking forward to furthering discussions this week." University of Ottawa law professor Errol Mendes, an international law expert who until June was a senior policy adviser in the Privy Council Office, said Mr. de Villepin's proposal would be rejected by the World Trade Organization.

"I think it's a non-starter," he said. "If you can't stop importations made even with child labour, because the WTO rules prohibits importation rules based on the means of production, I don't think this is going to go anywhere." But he said Canada could be challenged in the International Court of Justice for having signed an international treaty and then opting not to meet its commitments. The professor speculated that a country such as the Maldives, the Indian Ocean island nation that could be flooded if sea levels rise due to global warming, could take Canada to court. Canada's exports to France totalled $2.5-billion in 2005, compared with $5-billion in French sales to Canada. Canada's main exports include uranium, scallops, frozen lobster, mustard seed, dried lentils and newsprint. The aeronautics industry is a major source of trade, particularly with Quebec, and is the largest area of imports to Canada.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20061115.NAIROBI15/TPStory/Front
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I heard about this one today ITN. Frankly, I'ld like to hit good'ol' Dom with a frozen baguet. Is it too late to send France a bill for WWII?

I must admit, I'm having second thoughts about not supporting the accord. What with, only 30 nations being bound by it out of the 135 that signed on. No there is nothing wrong with it at all.

Could someone explain how Saudi Arabia is a developing Nation, to me?
 

Daz_Hockey

Council Member
Nov 21, 2005
1,927
7
38
Maybe they'd like a bill for the hundreds of thousands of British Empire troops they murdered in world war one?.

Sorry, I was watching a program on this the other day, I didn't realise that "charge men aimlessly, while murdering hundreds of thousands as long as we kill more than the germans" wasn't a British tactic. Apparently we like to be a wee bit strategic about our murderation (is that a word?, it is now!).

Some times I do ask why we ever signed peace terms with em, whats it got us eh?, world war one? two? crimean?.....just not worth it.

Bloody french....did you know after the British Commonwealth and the US liberating their country, they veto'd britain's entry into europe?...thats thanks for ya!!.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
The UN lists countries as developed or developing based on soemthing called the Human Development Index. The criteria takes things like life expectancy, literacy, education and standards of living into consideration. There are low, medium and high brackets. High is anything between 1-0.80, medium is 0.79 -0.5, and low anything 0.49 and under. Afghanistan and Iraq are on the not ranked list.

I think all nations should have to cut emissions by the same rules, regardless of how developed they are. Technically wouldn't it be easier to develop a country with new efficient technology, rather than letting them grow using old dirty technology, then have to switch their economies to a cleaner more efficient model? How hard or expensive will it be to nations like China and India to cut back once they overtake North American economies?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
That was pretty much my point in three threads now Ton.

There are tooooo many examptions and way tooooo much room for big business to exploit the "developing" nations to the detrimant of there ecology and our wallets.
 

Daz_Hockey

Council Member
Nov 21, 2005
1,927
7
38
That was pretty much my point in three threads now Ton.

There are tooooo many examptions and way tooooo much room for big business to exploit the "developing" nations to the detrimant of there ecology and our wallets.

Sorry, he's right, one sniff of the Garlic-smelling-surrender-monkeys and I get abit well........wound up sorry...please continue
 

Daz_Hockey

Council Member
Nov 21, 2005
1,927
7
38
LOL, Daz, I like your distinctly British look at things.

Now, now chief, it's a "distincly English" look on things, the Scots and the Welsh love the French, they might as well be them.

Someone should tell the French PM to just concerntrate on watching how his whole country is losing it's language.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
It will just cost them more to listen to Rita McNeill. You know they have to. They're addicted.
 

Daz_Hockey

Council Member
Nov 21, 2005
1,927
7
38
[FONT=Trebuchet MS, Arial, Helvetica]Anyone see the French Military Rifle on eBay? It's never been shot and only dropped once!


[/FONT]
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
I heard about this one today ITN. Frankly, I'ld like to hit good'ol' Dom with a frozen baguet. Is it too late to send France a bill for WWII?

I must admit, I'm having second thoughts about not supporting the accord. What with, only 30 nations being bound by it out of the 135 that signed on. No there is nothing wrong with it at all.

Could someone explain how Saudi Arabia is a developing Nation, to me?


Does france need to send a bill to united states for their independance??
 

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
[FONT=Trebuchet MS, Arial, Helvetica]Anyone see the French Military Rifle on eBay? It's never been shot and only dropped once!


[/FONT]



There we go again with the french being coward, guys it is time to realize that the most chicken/cowards peoples in this planet, are the anglo-saxon, no doubt about it, if you want proof, i'll give it to you.
 

DurkaDurka

Internet Lawyer
Mar 15, 2006
10,385
129
63
Toronto
There we go again with the french being coward, guys it is time to realize that the most chicken/cowards peoples in this planet, are the anglo-saxon, no doubt about it, if you want proof, i'll give it to you.

Why don't you provide us with proof of something interesting.... like the existence of aliens, the where abouts of the holy grail or the Colonel's secret ingredients.
 
Last edited:

Logic 7

Council Member
Jul 17, 2006
1,382
9
38
Why don't you provide us with proof of something interesting.... like the existence of aliens, the where abouts of the holy grail or the Colonel's secret ingredients.



Who cares about aliens? not me, who cares about religions?? not me
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Does france need to send a bill to united states for their independance??
Ummm, logic, and I use that term loosly. The US at the time the French aided them in gaining their independance, were richly rewarded and paid in full, for the weapons and supplies that they SOLD, the US.

So no, they do not need to send the bill, if you look closely at the bottom, you will see the "PAID IN FULL" stamp.

I could say, perhaps the US should send them a bill for their services in WWII(LWF). But then you'ld just ask if the French should send the US a bill, for the recipe for Freedom Toast.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Now, now chief, it's a "distincly English" look on things, the Scots and the Welsh love the French, they might as well be them.

Someone should tell the French PM to just concerntrate on watching how his whole country is losing it's language.
My apologies, distinctly English, then it is.
 

Daz_Hockey

Council Member
Nov 21, 2005
1,927
7
38
My apologies, distinctly English, then it is.

Sorry, I just saw on a webpage someone writing "she sings the British national anthem so well", which one's that then eh?, flower of scotland?, Ode to Wales?, or God save the queen.....shocking.


Although I think you missed Vietnam, I know us Brits had the sense to stay out of that little debackle (although the US sunk our economy....again because we didn't "even send a brass band"..it's all true, Harold McMillian n co)...I think we know who's fault that was.

nah America's debt to France has been paid back in full......and then some