Bill’s C-10 & C-11. If we aren’t talking about it already, shouldn’t we be?

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,260
11,680
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Prime Minister Mark Carney suggested Tuesday he is considering substituting or rescinding the Online News Act to ensure local news is disseminated wider and faster two years after Meta banned access to news on its platforms.

Asked if his government is considering an alternative to the Online News Act — previously known as C-18 — or simply rescinding it so that Web giant Meta would lift its ban on news articles being shared on its platforms, Carney suggested that was “part of our thinking around” improving the reach of local media.

“This government is a big believer in the value of … local news and the importance of ensuring that that is disseminated as widely and as quickly as possible. So, we will look for all avenues to do that,” he said.

The prime minister’s office did not immediately respond to questions about which avenues specifically the government is considering to improve the dissemination of local news.

Meta controversially banned news articles from its Canadian users two years ago in response to the federal government’s Online News Act, which compels social media giants to negotiate revenue-sharing deals with news publishers for the use of their content.

The bill specifically impacted Meta and Google, though both have taken diametrically opposing routes to get exempt from the Act. The former banned news content outright on its platforms when the bill became law, while the latter signed a $100 million annual deal with Canadian publishers last year.

Meta has argued against the “false premise” that it benefits from free online news articles and says that media companies are the ones that benefit from sharing their content to Facebook and Instagram audiences.

Shortly after Meta barred Canadian news articles on Facebook and Instagram, then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused the web giant of “putting corporate profits ahead of people’s safety”.

“Instead of making sure that local journalists are fairly paid for keeping Canadians informed on things like wildfires, Facebook is blocking news from its sites,” he said in August 2023.

“Right now in an emergency situation where up-to-date local information is more important than ever, Facebook’s putting corporate profits ahead of people’s safety, ahead of supporting quality local journalism,” he added.

During his press conference, Carney also reiterated his government’s campaign commitment to boost funding for CBC/Radio-Canada and change its governance so that it could provide “unbiased, immediate, local information” (???) during crises such the ongoing B.C. wildfires.
During the campaign, Carney committed to boosting the public broadcaster’s funding by $150 million yearly.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Taxslave2

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
120,584
14,932
113
Low Earth Orbit
Prime Minister Mark Carney suggested Tuesday he is considering substituting or rescinding the Online News Act to ensure local news is disseminated wider and faster two years after Meta banned access to news on its platforms.

Asked if his government is considering an alternative to the Online News Act — previously known as C-18 — or simply rescinding it so that Web giant Meta would lift its ban on news articles being shared on its platforms, Carney suggested that was “part of our thinking around” improving the reach of local media.

“This government is a big believer in the value of … local news and the importance of ensuring that that is disseminated as widely and as quickly as possible. So, we will look for all avenues to do that,” he said.

The prime minister’s office did not immediately respond to questions about which avenues specifically the government is considering to improve the dissemination of local news.

Meta controversially banned news articles from its Canadian users two years ago in response to the federal government’s Online News Act, which compels social media giants to negotiate revenue-sharing deals with news publishers for the use of their content.

The bill specifically impacted Meta and Google, though both have taken diametrically opposing routes to get exempt from the Act. The former banned news content outright on its platforms when the bill became law, while the latter signed a $100 million annual deal with Canadian publishers last year.

Meta has argued against the “false premise” that it benefits from free online news articles and says that media companies are the ones that benefit from sharing their content to Facebook and Instagram audiences.

Shortly after Meta barred Canadian news articles on Facebook and Instagram, then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau accused the web giant of “putting corporate profits ahead of people’s safety”.

“Instead of making sure that local journalists are fairly paid for keeping Canadians informed on things like wildfires, Facebook is blocking news from its sites,” he said in August 2023.

“Right now in an emergency situation where up-to-date local information is more important than ever, Facebook’s putting corporate profits ahead of people’s safety, ahead of supporting quality local journalism,” he added.

During his press conference, Carney also reiterated his government’s campaign commitment to boost funding for CBC/Radio-Canada and change its governance so that it could provide “unbiased, immediate, local information” (???) during crises such the ongoing B.C. wildfires.
During the campaign, Carney committed to boosting the public broadcaster’s funding by $150 million yearly.
Every city needs a Just Bins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Taxslave2

Senate Member
Aug 13, 2022
5,704
3,057
113
“Instead of making sure that local journalists are fairly paid for keeping Canadians informed on things like wildfires, Facebook is blocking news from its sites,” he said in August 2023.

“Right now in an emergency situation where up-to-date local information is more important than ever, Facebook’s putting corporate profits ahead of people’s safety, ahead of supporting quality local journalism,” he added.
Except this isn't really keeping the important new from getting out. All the fire departments have FB pages, and post the news themselves. I can't speak for all the fire news, in Canada,but any important information on fires in our area is on fb pages faster than any media outlet could ever hope to publish it.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,260
11,680
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Except this isn't really keeping the important new from getting out. All the fire departments have FB pages, and post the news themselves. I can't speak for all the fire news, in Canada,but any important information on fires in our area is on fb pages faster than any media outlet could ever hope to publish it.
I have no idea about Facebook locally because I just don’t do it. Not my bag. Wife-type on there every day but, not me.

Weirdly, as Pete mentioned above, our quick and broad new source locally comes from a garbage/waste disposal outfit, and the craziest shit ends up there almost immediately. Eventually a trickles to the media, or at least some of it does.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,260
11,680
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Taken together, the purpose of C-9 is plain: to generate more charges, more prosecutions, and more convictions for unwanted speech. On Sept. 19, the Carney government tabled Bill C-9, the Combatting Hate Act. It makes five changes to the Criminal Code — each one troubling for free expression.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Dixie Cup

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
120,584
14,932
113
Low Earth Orbit
Taken together, the purpose of C-9 is plain: to generate more charges, more prosecutions, and more convictions for unwanted speech. On Sept. 19, the Carney government tabled Bill C-9, the Combatting Hate Act. It makes five changes to the Criminal Code — each one troubling for free expression.
Where do I buy a "Fuck Carney" flag?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dixie Cup

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,260
11,680
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Every city needs a Just Bins.
As I was coming home from work, I came across an accident with lots of emergency responders, showing up as I was coming up on this…& I snapped a few pictures and sent them to a coworker, who immediately sent them to Just Bins, and they are already in the process of getting this up onto their site…this is within minutes!! Show me a news site that can do that…
1760139958773.jpeg
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
120,584
14,932
113
Low Earth Orbit
As I was coming home from work, I came across an accident with lots of emergency responders, showing up as I was coming up on this…& I snapped a few pictures and sent them to a coworker, who immediately sent them to Just Bins, and they are already in the process of getting this up onto their site…this is within minutes!! Show me a news site that can do that…
View attachment 31512
Good on ya! Where was it at?

I don't miss the hood 1 iota. 4 days in Sapperton and I've yet to see anyone here smoking meth like its tobacco. Its not for lack of wandering either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron in Regina

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
32,260
11,680
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
On Friday, the CRTC announced the first step of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act. Any “online streaming services” — be they podcast providers or video platforms — were given until Nov. 28 to make their first-ever registration with the CRTC.

It’s just a quick form laying out contact details and the name of a “designated representative” who can be expected to carry out subsequent CRTC instructions. But if the form isn’t received by then, it’s a Bill C-11 violation and thus a possible $10 million fine.

The announcement immediately attracted attention well beyond the usual circles that care about CRTC regulatory changes. Perennial world’s wealthiest man Elon Musk declared “Trudeau is trying to crush free speech in Canada.”

Investigative reporter Glenn Greenwald wrote a viral social media post branding the registration as the opening salvo of “one of the world’s most repressive online censorship schemes.”

To this, defenders of the move shot back that the registration only applies to companies with annual revenues of more than $10 million. “That is very few companies offering podcasts in Canada,” wrote CBC Business reporter Anis R. Heydari.

But the $10 million threshold is a bit of a red herring given that the explicit end-goal of C-11 is to have all of Canada’s primary podcast and video platforms subject to federal controls. While very few Canadian podcasters and video streamers can claim eight-figure revenues, almost all of them rely on a distributor (such as Spotify or YouTube) that does — and it’s those distributors who will likely be mandated by Ottawa to enforce the requirements of C-11 on their users.

More. Link. Etc…
Don’t worry, supporters of this policy claim; there’s nothing to worry about, it’s not about individual podcasters — it’s only companies earning more than $10 million per year. The players making more than $10 million per year are the platforms that content producers like me and millions of others rely on to get our message out to the public.

Saying you won’t regulate an individual podcaster, just the platforms they stream on, is like saying you won’t regulate individual drivers, just the highways they drive on.

The result is the same.
When they discover that very few "Podcasters" likely make over $10M, the amount will be reduced to $5M then $1M then $100,000K et al. Just wait for it! They absolutely need absolute control over everything said. We're not a democracy anymore.
“Podcasters” don’t have to make over $10,000,000, they just have to have their content hosted on a service that makes over $10M to get caught up in this.
OTTAWA — The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) announced on Thursday it will require online streamers to pay 15 per cent of their annual Canadian revenues towards Canadian and Indigenous content.

The decision was made following consultations on how to implement the Online Streaming Act; legislation passed in 2023 that obliges Netflix and other streaming services to financially support Canadian content and promote it on their platforms.

In 2024, the CRTC required online streamers that generate more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues, to pay five per cent of its revenues towards funds that fostered Canadian content.

U.S. tech giants such as Apple, Amazon, Spotify and the Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents the largest American studios, are challenging the order in Canadian federal court.

A decision is expected soon, with the payments paused in the meantime.

One of the things about the CRTC – we’re a quasi-judicial tribunal; we have effectively the powers of the federal court, which is why when we’re challenged, it goes to the Federal Court of Appeal,” said Scott Shortliffe, vice-president of broadcasting at the CRTC, during a media briefing on Thursday.

The overall policy of the CRTC is we move forward, if we waited for courts to rule, whether it’s on the broadcasting or telecom side, [firstly] we would just give an incentive for everyone to take us to court on everything all the time,” added Shortcliffe, noting that the regulator needs to keep doing its work.
The NAFTA/USMCA/CUSMA/SMEGMA negotiations are coming up pretty soon. Canada has argued the streaming legislation falls within the cultural exemption laid out in the Canada-United-States-Mexico-Agreement (CUSMA).
The Online Streaming Act has become a major trade irritant for the U.S. In March, Republican lawmaker Lloyd Smucker tabled a bill in U.S. Congress titled the Protecting American Streaming and Innovation Act, which if passed, could use Section 301 in the 1974 Trade Act to investigate whether Canada’s new broadcasting law discriminates against American companies.
Anyway, Shortcliffe said the CRTC will “pay careful attention” to whatever court rulings eventually come out?

The CTRC said the 15 per cent “contribution” includes the pre-existing 5 per cent base “contribution,” the majority of which can be spent on Canadian content productions. Nearly 30% of that expenditure must go towards French content, because somewhere between 20.8% & 22% of Canadians have French as their first language.

Canadian broadcasting groups and foreign streamers that make over $100 million in annual revenues will be subject to additional requirements, including that 30% of their expenditures must be directed to enhance partnerships with Canadian production companies, which are defined as companies where Canadians own the majority of the copyright, and at least 15 per cent of investments must go towards support for Canadian news content.

The CRTC said Thursday’s decision will ensure $2 billion in support of Canadian and Indigenous content, such as French-language content and news.