BREAKING: Ontario issues stay-at-home order except for essentials
Ontario has declared a second provincial emergency in response to COVID-19 that orders all residents to stay at home except for essentials.
Ontario issues stay-at-home order except for essentials
- Thread starter spaminator
- Start date
ONTARIO INVOKES STATE OF EMERGENCY: Stay home, except for essentials
Ontario has declared a second provincial state of emergency in response to COVID-19 that requires all residents to stay at home except for essentials.
LILLEY: Is the stay-at-home order worse than the curfew?
We may have dodged a curfew, but we‘ll have to wait a few days before we know whether the “stay-at-home” order from the Ford government is even worse.
Ontario issues stay-at-home order as COVID-19 threatens to overwhelm hospitals
OTTAWA — Canada’s biggest province declared a new state of emergency Tuesday and is invoking a stay-at-home order as COVID-19 threatens to overwhelm Ontario…
The Ford administration has been too reactionary with covid. They've had a year to figure this out and they keep stumbling.
It's time for a change.
It's time for a change.
Astonishing COVID-19 Testing Fraud Revealed
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- PCR tests cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. The false appearance of a lethal pandemic has been manufactured using cycle thresholds (CTs) that are too high
- The higher the CT — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA particles — the greater the chance of a false positive. Research shows that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically
- The SARS-CoV-2 PCR test was developed based on a genetic sequence published by Chinese scientists, not the viral isolate. Missing genetic code was simply made up
- November 30, 2020, 22 international scientists published a review challenging the scientific paper on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 that was adopted as the standard across the world. The scientists are calling for the so-called Corman-Drosten paper to be retracted due to its numerous errors
- The flaws of PCR testing have been capitalized upon to incite fear in order to benefit the Great Reset agenda developed by a technocratic elite
Government Scientists Are Paid Off to Hide Data
According to a government watchdog, the NIH and other scientists received an estimated $350 million in payments. Read the report here.
The trouble is MF: the backers of tyranny and stupid uneducated people - it as I have said from the beginning: A GIANT FLIPPIN FRAUD!
That's no loss!
You don't know how many times I had to hit myself in the head with a hockey stick to make that happen!
Are you kidding?
The current gov't is light years ahead of where the previous liberal gov't would have been if they had been in charge.
We're LUCKY that there was a change in leadership before the pandemic.
The liberal gov't had 15 years prior to the change and not only did they not make almost anything better but they actually screwed many things up worse!
Toronto not ready to enforce Premier Doug Ford's stay-at-home order
Officials simply don't have enough information from the province, Pegg says
READ IT HERE: Ontario government issues its stay-at-home order
What are you allowed to do and what are you not?
Ford government seeks to clarify confusion over COVID clampdown
Ontario’s new stay-at-home order should be simple to follow — “stay home,” Premier Doug Ford says.
Ford derangement syndrome.
Let's compare Ontario and Quebec. As of Jan 13 Ontario gained another 2961 cases. Quebec gained 2071 cases. Ontario administered almost 50,000 tests while Quebec did fewer than 10,000. That means that of the 49,684 people that were tested in the past week in Ontario, around 5% tested positive (How many were false positives we'll probably never know). In Quebec, they tested 8692 people and gained 2071 new cases, translating to almost 25% testing positive.(Again, who knows how many were false positives).
Ontario, a bigger province than Quebec by 6 million people, had an increase of 5% in new cases this past week while Quebec had an increase of 25% in new cases this past week.
BY comparison, 15% of people tested in BC this past week tested positive.
There's no test numbers for Alberta.
23% of people tested in SK this past week tested positive.
In MB it was 9%.
NL and Lab. had no new cases
NB is just shy of 2%
NS had just a little of one half one percent test positive this past week.
There are no stats for PEI and Nunavut while the territories had no new cases.
So to sum up for the provinces where stats are available, BC, SK, MB and QC all had significantly more cases per population tested this past week than Ontario.
Sorry to hammer you with facts and reality. I hope you can handle it without snowflaking out.
(How many were false positives we'll probably never know)
I think there is more to that statement than meets the eye.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) just updated its data on the number of deaths involving COVID-19, pneumonia, and influenza. This information can be found on the CDC’s website under “Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics.”
This data was always frustrating to me because COVID-19 deaths were always lumped in with other comorbidities. There was no way to strip out the number of actual COVID-19 deaths that had no other listed causes of death… until now:
Source: CDC
Above, we can see a screenshot taken directly from the CDC’s website (the highlighting is mine).
The CDC is now breaking out the numbers. Only 6% of the COVID-19 deaths died exclusively from COVID-19. Just 6%! On average, the rest of the COVID-19 “deaths” had two or three other underlying causes of death (the average was 2.6).
COVID-19 total “deaths” in the U.S. are at 168,864.
So 6% is only 10,131 deaths from COVID-19 with no other underlying causes.
But it gets so much better… It really was an exciting weekend.
The New York Times put out an extensive article on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests and how they determine who has COVID-19 or not. The PCR tests are widely used to search for small segments of genetic material that look like COVID-19. If it finds it, the test is positive.
But there is a major problem…
The sensitivity levels of the PCR tests have been set too high. The New York Times reports that up to 90% of people testing “positive” carried barely any virus.
In other words, people may have had COVID-19 a while ago but certainly didn’t have it now. Or the test may have detected some naturally occurring genetic segments that looked like COVID-19 but weren’t.
To put things in context, if the medical community set appropriate sensitivity levels resulting in “real” positives for COVID-19, the COVID-19-related genetic material in a patient’s sample would have to be anywhere between 100-fold to 1,000-fold the levels that are being used today.
Nuts… that’s how far off the settings are.
IF that is the case then...someone ought to be considered well hung for being a dick.
I think there is more to that statement than meets the eye.
Up to 90% of PCR Tests for COVID-19 May Be False Positives
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) just updated its data on the number of deaths involving COVID-19, pneumonia, and influenza. This information can be found on the CDC’s website under “Weekly Updates by Select Demographic and Geographic Characteristics.”
This data was always frustrating to me because COVID-19 deaths were always lumped in with other comorbidities. There was no way to strip out the number of actual COVID-19 deaths that had no other listed causes of death… until now:
Source: CDC
Above, we can see a screenshot taken directly from the CDC’s website (the highlighting is mine).
The CDC is now breaking out the numbers. Only 6% of the COVID-19 deaths died exclusively from COVID-19. Just 6%! On average, the rest of the COVID-19 “deaths” had two or three other underlying causes of death (the average was 2.6).
COVID-19 total “deaths” in the U.S. are at 168,864.
So 6% is only 10,131 deaths from COVID-19 with no other underlying causes.
But it gets so much better… It really was an exciting weekend.
The New York Times put out an extensive article on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests and how they determine who has COVID-19 or not. The PCR tests are widely used to search for small segments of genetic material that look like COVID-19. If it finds it, the test is positive.
But there is a major problem…
The sensitivity levels of the PCR tests have been set too high. The New York Times reports that up to 90% of people testing “positive” carried barely any virus.
In other words, people may have had COVID-19 a while ago but certainly didn’t have it now. Or the test may have detected some naturally occurring genetic segments that looked like COVID-19 but weren’t.
To put things in context, if the medical community set appropriate sensitivity levels resulting in “real” positives for COVID-19, the COVID-19-related genetic material in a patient’s sample would have to be anywhere between 100-fold to 1,000-fold the levels that are being used today.
Nuts… that’s how far off the settings are.
Up to 90% of PCR Tests for COVID-19 May Be False Positives | Brownstone Research
The New York Times reports that up to 90% of people testing “positive” carried barely any virus.
www.brownstoneresearch.com
IF that is the case then...someone ought to be considered well hung for being a dick.
Yeah, she's the one that caused a whole bunch of debt that Ford is now outspending.
Thanks goodness we fixed that problem!
Stay-at-home order sparks lots of questions from confused citizens
Toronto Police say they will not be pulling over residents in cars or on the street to demand proof they're on an essential trip to go shopping or to work.
WARMINGTON: Torontonians prepared as lockdown confusion reigns
Torontonians were prepared to present their papers to authorities should they have demanded to see them.