Yes.
AB and SK separate and commandeer the name Canada... The Eastern part of the country can call themselves Pussyville in honor of tater tot
WELL GOSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That seems a bit extreme!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The REAL ISSUE -meaning the one that can resolbe whole lot of out troubles.......................
is the answer to a SIMPLE QUESTION::::::::::::::::::::::
"I ASK - "are natives Cdn citizens or not"??????????????????????????
By which I mean "do they have any obligation to obey Cdn laws when off the Reserve"???????????????????????
LIE-berals have been encouraging natives to think the ANSWER IS "NO"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CONSIDER:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Here is an article illustrating how intransigent radical Cdn natives are and how unwilling they are to compromise on anything as a result of LIE-beral encouragement!! With some comments of my own in brackets):
Cabin seized by Sask. govt 'integral' to trapper's way of life, First Nations leaders say, urging its return
By Kendall Latimer, from CBC News
Published February 20. 2020
First Nations leaders are calling on the Saskatchewan government to return the cabin of a northern trapper in the province so he can continue living a traditional way of life.
Indigenous trapper Richard Durocher learned of the seizure of his cabin, originally located about 40 kilometres north of Pinehouse, Sask., on Feb. 4, 2019 when a contractor hauled it away.
(It is the LOCATION of the cabin - not the access to a trap line that is the problem
as Ministry MADE CLEAR!! Even the fact the guy built a cabin on Crown Land IS NOT THE ISSUE - it is ONLY SPECIFIC LOCATION on Crown Land!!!!!!!!)
Lac La Ronge Indian Band (LLRIB) Chief Tammy Cook-Searson said the province should put it back and grant him full access to his trap line. The province's Ministry of Environment maintains that despite the cabin seizure, "there are no restrictions on Mr. Durocher accessing his trap line."
"Many members from our First Nations still rely on their inherent and Treaty right to hunt, fish, trap and gather for their sustenance and health," Cook-Searson said in a written statement.
Cook-Searson spoke in a joint-statement issued by the Federation of Sovereign Indigenous Nations (FSIN), the Prince Albert Grand Council (PAGC) and LLRIB released on Wednesday.
She said leaders want to resolve this to ensure the livelihood, health, and well-being of band members like Durocher.
Durocher is a sustenance fur harvester and his application to build his cabin was denied. He said he was encouraged by local Métis officials to "go ahead and build it because we have rights. We're going to take our land back."
(Ah - “take the land back” in a dispute that makes it CLEAR natives feel NO OBLIGATION to obey any white law - are natives CDN citizens or not?? If they are NOT citizens then why do we spend BILLIONS of dollars to support them as completely as we do - surely our obligations to foreigners are limited??????????)
A Ministry of Environment spokesperson said it had attempted to work with Durocher about relocating his cabin in the past.
The spokesperson said cabin builds aren't allowed within eight kilometres of either side of the Key Lake, Cigar Lake, McArthur Lake, Cluff Lake and Rabbit Lake roads. The Durocher family is known to have used the land for traditional activities long before the highway to the mine site was built.
(So keep using the land - just don’t be PISSY about siting a cabin!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
The province also said the site is "popular with other users for camping, fishing and other recreational activities." For the Métis Nation-Saskatchewan, Durocher's case raises concerns about the priority of recreational us over traditional land use.
Second trapper's cabin removed
A second trapper's cabin was recently removed from the north shore of Dore Lake. It belonged to Travis Laliberte, a Métis trapper from Beauval who's now unsure if he'll be able to have a cabin ever again.
(The USUAL NATIVE BULLSH+T - they see NO REASON TO COOPERATE with any govt agency or with OTHER Cdn CITIZENS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
"I feel that not being able to ever have a trappers cabin now is like taking one of my Aboriginal rights away," he said in an emailed statement to CBC.
(But 3 bedroom houses, pickup trucks and roads to drive on, welfare payments, hospital care as needed, skidoos and electrical appliances all created and VERY FREQUENTLY PAID FOR by white people ARE a native RIGHT???????????
Laliberte had been approved to build on a different site about 500 metres from where he put up his cabin three years ago.
(So this descendent of legendary travellers and hunters CANNOT travel 1500 metres ON HIS SKIDOO to an APPROVED CABIN SITE????????????????)
Instead, he built nearby at a beach location. It appears that location runs afoul of Crown land guidelines which stipulate cabins must be more than a half-kilometre away from a beach which could serve a recreational purpose.
However, Laliberte says "a guideline that was created without consultation makes me believe it is only in place to benefit the person or people who created it."
Ministry of Environment defends decision
(Gosh- the guideline was created for the purpose of TOURISM - and of course the beach would be open to enjoyment of NATIVES AS WELL - with govt gathering tourist revenue to AID IN SUPPLYING GRAVY TO NATIVES!!!!!!!!!!!!)
Brant Kirychuk, executive director of the Fish, Wildlife and Lands branch for the ministry, said Laliberte's cabin was indeed built on an unauthorized location on a pristine, sandy beach in a "very, very, very actively used area." He said complaints of the cabin came in "almost immediately."
(So one HOG claims an ENTIRE ACTIVELY USED BEACH for himself!!!!!!!!!)
The local land manager made attempts to help Laliberte choose a new "appropriate" location; "all resulting in non-compliance, so ultimately an order was issued under that Provincial Lands Act," according to Kirychuk.
Kirychuk said anyone who applied to build at the two sites would be denied. He added 100s of traditional resource cabins are approved yearly, but most are located in remote parts of northern Saskatchewan, and therefore face no "conflict."
(In other words- natives CAN BUILD AS THEY PLEASE - JUST SO LONG AS THEY DON’T HOG the most popular spots!! And natives DO UNDERSTAND trespass laws - since warfare between tribes used to be COMMON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
When asked whether recreational activities were taking precedence over traditional practices, Kirychuk said "traditional rights are to conduct traditional activities: hunt, fish and gather" on Crown land.
(NO hunting or fishing rights were LIMITED during the removal of this cabin!!!!
But the building of the cabin DID LIMIT the rights of other citizens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
He added they "consider all users in the area to determine if there is a conflict" when considering disposition. Leaders says education required
(Yes - natives NEED to understand THEY ARE CDN CITIZENS with an obligation to SHARE in an honest way!! Cdn law regulates what can be built and where so the MAJORITY CAN BENEFIT - too bad natives DEMAND MORE RIGHTS THAN OTHERS!! In addition - Cdn law makes a distinction between a native reserve that is controlled by natives - and Crown Land which is controlled by GOVT for the benefit OF ALL CITIZENS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
(Thus natives are DELIBERATELY STAGING A POLITICAL COUP!! The land under dispute at Oka and the land under dispute at Caledonia was ALL SOLD OFF DECADES AGO BY NATIVES - yet natives DEMAND CONTROL of land they do not own - and LIE-berals are encouraging this CRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
First Nations leaders in the joint statement also argue that "building and maintaining a trapping cabin is reasonably incidental to the Treaty right to trap."
(Sure - build a cabin - WITHIN THE SPECIFIED LEGISLATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
"Erecting a cabin is integral to the traditional method of hunting and trapping," said Brian Hardlotte, PAGC grand chief, in a statement.
"
uilding a cabin is protected by Treaty and ... the [Charter of Rights and Freedoms], and I fail to see which authority the province based its decision on removing this cabin," he argued.
(REFUSING TO SEE is NOT a valid legal argument!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
The Ministry of Environment said in a statement on Wednesday that Durocher's cabin now belongs to the contractor who removed it, as it was forfeited to the Crown.
Durocher can apply again for a traditional resource use cabin and that Ministry staff are prepared to work with him to find a location they say is OK.
There are no other cabins under removal order by the Provincial Lands Act, at this time.
(Gosh - no other cabins under removal order at this time?? SO natives are playing THIS ONE as a legal trial balloon to see if they can BULLY LIE-beral govt into MORE concessions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
(Only in Canada would some people BITTERLY OBJECT to being treated as ONLY SLIGHTLY SUPERIOR UNDER the law!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)