Doesn't Project Fear ever take a day off?

[Serryah]

Nope.

Then full stop, any opinion expressed after that is pure BS on your part. Keep your whiney ass silent on the issue.

In fact, I don't know why I even bothered looking at all. GlobalFirepower, you see, is well-known for being hugely inaccurate in its rankings, basing them almost solely on quantity rather than quality./

If that's the case, then show me a web site/organization that does hold things to a 'fairer' standard.

It doesn't take into account for, example, logistics. It ranks China and Russia and even Japan and South Korea above Britain. Now China and Russia may have the numbers but what and Japan and Soutth Korea lack is a global presence, with the abilitty to project armed forces anywhere in the world within 24 hours and with military bases all around the world. These are capablities Britain has. Russia has a large military, but its blaoted, slow and stuck within the confines of its own borders. Britain, on the other hand, can find anywhere in the world, and would beat China and Russia in war away from their own doorsteps.

You said you didn't look, so you can't say WHAT it takes into account for its rankings.


Or were you lying about that?

 

[Blackleaf]

Then full stop, any opinion expressed after that is pure BS on your part. Keep your whiney ass silent on the issue.

In fact, I don't know why I even bothered looking at all. GlobalFirepower, you see, is well-known for being hugely inaccurate in its rankings, basing them almost solely on quantity rather than quality./

If that's the case, then show me a web site/organization that does hold things to a 'fairer' standard.
You said you didn't look, so you can't say WHAT it takes into account for its rankings.
Or were you lying about that?

I know the website. Lots of people do. It's known for its inaccurate rankings.

 

[pgs]

Nope.

In fact, I don't know why I even bothered looking at all. GlobalFirepower, you see, is well-known for being hugely inaccurate in its rankings, basing them almost solely on quantity rather than quality.

It doesn't take into account for, example, logistics. It ranks China and Russia and even Japan and South Korea above Britain. Now China and Russia may have the numbers but what and Japan and Soutth Korea lack is a global presence, with the abilitty to project armed forces anywhere in the world within 24 hours and with military bases all around the world. These are capablities Britain has. Russia has a large military, but its blaoted, slow and stuck within the confines of its own borders. Britain, on the other hand, can find anywhere in the world, and would beat China and Russia in war away from their own doorsteps.

It sure took a long time for your forces to reach the Falklands . You did project strength once there I must admit .

 

[Serryah]

Then full stop, any opinion expressed after that is pure BS on your part. Keep your whiney ass silent on the issue.

In fact, I don't know why I even bothered looking at all. GlobalFirepower, you see, is well-known for being hugely inaccurate in its rankings, basing them almost solely on quantity rather than quality./

I know the website. Lots of people do. It's known for its inaccurate rankings.

Again, then where's a different one that provides accurate - as you put it - rankings of the world military? Would love to see it.