Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Are you sure that security clearance preferences were never used in the history of POTUS?

If think that this is done sort of"business as usual" Presidency and that the poor man is being persecuted, somehow, you are as blind as a bat. It's one thing to be faithful. It is quite another to willfully ignore.


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/worl...team-overruled-25-security-clearance-denials/

http://globalnews.ca/news/5117827/trump-security-clearances-disqualifying-issues/

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...es-clinton-emails-benghazi-column/3353343002/
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,033
6,155
113
Twin Moose Creek
If think that this is done sort of"business as usual" Presidency and that the poor man is being persecuted, somehow, you are as blind as a bat. It's one thing to be faithful. It is quite another to willfully ignore.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/worl...team-overruled-25-security-clearance-denials/
http://globalnews.ca/news/5117827/trump-security-clearances-disqualifying-issues/
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...es-clinton-emails-benghazi-column/3353343002/


Oh like the last President?

https://www.politifact.com/florida/...west-says-he-has-clearance-even-president-un/

There's one more possible interpretation, and when we reached the West campaign, they said this is indeed what the candidate meant at the forum. As a career military officer, West went through a rigorous screening and investigatory process in order to receive his TS/SCI clearance. President Barack Obama got his authority by virtue of a popular vote. There is no security process required before one becomes president.

If, in theory, Obama was not president and decided to apply for a security clearance, there's no guarantee he'd qualify for one. He'd have to go through a painstaking process, and investigators may raise any number of questions.

"The fact that (Obama) admitted to cocaine use, travel to unauthorized countries years before, and his associations with (black nationalist) Louis Farrakhan and Rev. Jeremiah Wright, he probably would not have been granted a security clearance," said Josh Grodin, West's campaign manager.

This argument does at least have a grain of validity to it. But we see some problems with it.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,033
6,155
113
Twin Moose Creek
Or this
https://www.newsweek.com/jared-kush...white-house-access-ivanka-donald-trump-723993

Several requests for comment from Kushner’s legal team and the White House communications office went unanswered. Representatives from federal agencies involved in the security clearance application process declined to comment on the record, citing a practice of not commenting on specific applications.
Regardless of whether Kushner is actually qualified to get a security clearance, little is likely to change in the West Wing, as the president has the ultimate authority in determining whether his son-in-law and Middle East peace envoy eventually receives a permanent clearance.
"The entire security clearance process comes down to the president," said Sean Bigley, an attorney who did background checks for security clearances and worked in the Department of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush. "It would be extremely rare—almost unheard of—though [Trump] could order a clearance to be granted, or reverse an adverse decision made by adjudicators if he wanted to. But most of the time we see these cases are left to nonpolitical career personnel."

So 3 legitimate issues for impeachment please
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,033
6,155
113
Twin Moose Creek
There has to be a better reason than I don't like him to get him impeached, his popularity grows more after each accusation is proven false, one day the US will have to accept he is POTUS.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
There has to be a better reason than I don't like him to get him impeached, his popularity grows more after each accusation is proven false, one day the US will have to accept he is POTUS.
What can I say? Let history unfold. The US has never had someone like Trump at the top. It could rip them apart.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
I don't think Trump is all that much different than early presidents.

Politics was always a playground for the rich.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,771
9,270
113
Washington DC
You're just sore because he burnt out the Shawnee and ethically cleansed their lands.
It was all perfectly legal.
Nah, we were f*cked long before he came into office.

Washington and Jefferson did us. And Madison.

By the time Jackson came to office, we were all in Oklahoma, Canada, or being hunted for sport in Ohio.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Ocasio-Cortez deletes tweet misidentifying a fellow House Democrat as an ‘older male’ Republican




http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...0190425-nryb2mljznccjoqhxn777fesra-story.html




Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is seeing red.



The rookie New York lawmaker tweeted and quickly deleted a post Thursday that misidentified Kentucky’s only Democratic member of Congress as a Republican “older male."

Ocasio-Cortez’s since-deleted tweet was referencing a post issued by the Republican Party of Kentucky featuring a photo of Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.) grinning next to a cardboard cutout of the Bronx-born Democrat.



“GOP: Let’s pose our older male members next to cardboard cutouts of young female legislators,” Ocasio-Cortez posted in response to the Kentucky GOP’s post.






Nope... just another creepy old Alt-Left liberal like the ones in here.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,033
6,155
113
Twin Moose Creek
Another slap down by Nancy Lol

Pelosi Invokes Obama to Head Off Ocasio-Cortez's Green New Deal

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is trying to head off her party’s restive progressive caucus by invoking the legacy of President Barack Obama to build support for a climate change bill that falls well short of the ambitions of the Green New Deal championed by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Pelosi is planning a vote by the House this week on a bill that would prohibit President Donald Trump’s administration from going through with plans to pull out of the Paris climate agreement.
Liberal Democrats are leaving little doubt that the legislation won’t be enough.
“The idea that we can just reintroduce 2009 policies is not reflective of action that is necessary for now in the world of today,” said Ocasio-Cortez. The New York lawmaker said “there is no harm in passing” the Paris bill, but she still backs the bolder action called for in her Green New Deal, which conservatives have derided as a socialist manifesto.
Revisiting Obama’s accomplishments on climate change mirrors Pelosi’s strategy on other issues, including health care. She often suggests shoring up the Affordable Care Act rather than pursuing bolder policies like Medicare for All that some liberal presidential candidates have embraced but that might unnerve swing voters.
The House is expected to begin debate on the climate legislation, H.R. 9, Wednesday and could take a vote by the end of the week.
There is a legislative argument for House Democrats to start with these bills since Trump has been testing the constitutional limits of what he can do to reverse his predecessor’s signature achievements. He has taken executive action to reverse Obama administration policies and chip away at regulations.
There is also a political rationale for starting with issues that in some cases have become more popular with voters. Moderate Democrats, some of whom displaced Republican incumbents to help regain Democratic control of the House, are wary of being cast with progressive colleagues as they prepare to defend swing district seats in 2020.
“That administration put forward real solutions for the American families,” Representative Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, vice chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said of Obama’s tenure. “There is no sort of ‘moderate response’ here. It’s just that we are at the beginning of this process.”
The climate legislation by Florida Democratic Representative Kathy Castor, has 224 Democratic co-sponsors.
It would prohibit Trump from making good on his vow to pull out of the climate agreement, under which the U.S. promised to reduce carbon pollution by at least 26 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. The legislation bars the Trump administration from using any funds to withdraw from the agreement and instead requires it to craft a plan to meet the greenhouse gas reductions under the accord.
“We must make the Republican denial face the reality of what the Trump administration is doing to our natural environment and our constitutional environment -- and act with the boldest common denominator to repair the damage and build a better future,” Pelosi, a California representative, wrote in an Earth Day letter.
Related: Trump to Tout Green Bona Fides While Gutting Environmental Rules
Yet that won’t do for progressives who are pushing for more aggressive action and are worried that the vote would be a substitute for meaningful legislation.
“Simply put, it’s the junior varsity bill,” said RL Miller, the chairman of the California Democratic Party’s environmental caucus and co-founder of the Climate Hawks Vote, a political action committee. “It’s nice but extremely insufficient.”
Focusing on the Paris accord allows Democrats to paint Republicans as opposing solutions to global warming and highlight what they say is a lack of leadership on the issue by Trump, who has dismissed climate change as a hoax.
The White House has issued a veto threat for the bill, reiterating arguments Trump made when he announced he would pull the U.S. out of the agreement -- that staying in it would cost billions of dollars, put millions of jobs at risk, and make the U.S. less competitive.
Democrats say they plan additional action on climate change, but have yet to outline the next steps -- instead pointing to a special climate committee established by Pelosi to study the issue, a move that critics have dismissed as toothless.
“The Paris agreement is a substantial step in the right direction,” Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, said of the bill up for a vote. “It is a beginning point. It is not a middle point, it’s not an end point.”