Maybe, they both have a better future trading with the Europeans than with a poor, depressed England, who will be suffering forever under punative tarrifs imposed on her as a warning to the EU members not to leave.
And there we have the classic contradiction all in one sentence.
On the one hand we get told that the UK will suffer because it's leaving the European Union, a union with which the UK does a lot of trade (43%, but falling, of UK trade), so the UK will suffer as a result, and yet on the other hand we get told that Scotland should leave the UK and that it would be better off outside it even though 63% of Scottish trade is with the UK.
As for saying that Scotland will have a better future as part of the EU than as part of the UK, I doubt you'd be saying that if Scotland left the UK, rejoined the EU as a new nation state, and has to accept the disastrous euro (which polls show most Scots don't want because it will be disastrous for the Scottish economy), Schengen, free movement of people and be a net contributor to the EU budget rather than - as it is now - a net receiver of subsidies from the UK Treasury. And Scotland in the EU still won't be an independent, sovereign state. Ir'd still be part of a political union but be run by Brussels rather than London. And as a small member state it'll have much less of a voice and much less influence in the EU as it does in the UK - it'd be dwarved and have less voting power than titans such as Sweden, Hungary, Belgium, Portugal and Austria.