Imagine if you will. [Play along]

[spilledthebeer]

Imagine if you will, a time when chickens could cross the road without having their motivations come into question.

With the intention of promoting Cdn culture- here are some uniquely Cdn words and phrases- with their local meanings:

Logic: has two meanings., Firstly, as used by a Conservative it is a thought process designed to elicit a sensible and complete understanding of an issue. As used by a LIE-beral, it is a selective process designed to find facts that support a conclusion preferred by LIE-berals- while at the same time suppressing facts which do not fit the preferred LIE-beral conclusion.

Fake News: A body of one sided opinion- falsely masquerading as even handed analysis of a contentious issue and usually presented in support of LIE-beral policy and defended using the LIE-beral version of logic- see above.

Immigrant: Another word with several meanings depending on context. LIE-berals define an immigrant as a person born outside Canada, who has, for one reason or another, decided to become a Cdn citizen. LIE-berals insist that any and all human beings have the capacity to become good Cdn citizens if only we throw enough money their way.

Conservatives consider the LIE-beral definition of an immigrant to be Fake News and typical false LIE-beral logic. The Conservative definition splits immigrants seeking entry to Canada into two groups- those who have the morals, logic, language skills, education and political wisdom to integrate smoothly into our grossly indebted and over taxed economy- and others- selected by LIE-berals primarily for their willingness to support LIE-beral policy regardless of benefit to Canada. The immigrant selected by Conservatives is expected to be useful and helpful to the nation- not so for the LIE-beral candidate.

The immigrant chosen by a Conservative does not harbour hatred of western values and does not have the urge to change western society by violent means. The Conservative immigrant does not wish to end all our long standing economic and military alliances that have kept us safe since before Confederation; nor does he wish to force new alliances on us with nations and military action groups such as Iran, Hezzbollah and Taliban. The Conservative immigrant does not wish to force Sharia Law upon us and thus does not wish to reduce all women to the status of barefoot, pregnant, 18th century chattels. Any potential immigrant who demonstrates support for female genital mutilation, the beating of a woman who is deemed in need of “discipline” by an Imam, honour killings of women who have offended a man, or hatred of Jews will be rejected. Any immigrant chosen by Conservatives, who commits a criminal offense against Canada, will be stripped of citizenship and sent packing after completing a prison sentence.

By comparison, the LIE-beral immigration selection process is much simpler and much more selfish. The LIE-beral cares little for educational prowess nor for any sort of demonstrated habit of logic or religious tolerance in those they select. LIE-berals simply seek out those who can be relied upon to keep voting LIE-beral in future. In fact, LIE-berals consider well educated immigrants with a strong dedication to democracy and capitalism to be fossilized antiques left over from an age now dead and buried. Such success oriented persons who expect to stand on their own feet and reap a just reward for their honest labour have no place in the LIE-beral New Social Order that will arise once the Trudope family destroys what they see as Cdn Imperialism- as defined by father Pierre Trudope.

Islamophobia: A vague body of thought that has yet to be defined. The word was coined by LIE-berals and is used as an insult against persons who do not accept LIE-beral Fake News. Elements of Islamophobia include a fear of Muslim Radical groups who are dedicated to using terror and massacres of civilians to intimidate westerners into obeying the will of the World Wide Caliphate. Other elements of Islamophobia include a fear that Muslims in Canada will follow through with their stated aim of forcing Sharia Law- defined by Muslims as “the most perfect system” onto us- under threat of violence and criminal harassment.

The LIE-beral concept of Islamophobia is a slippery one to nail down- as it also contains personal elements uniquely related to LIE-beral Fake News. For instance, any person who demonstrates hostility to LIE-beral policy is usually referred to as an Islamphobe- it seems to be a verbal shorthand for any person who is defined as an enemy of LIE-berals.

Systemic racism: Another phrase coined by LIE-berals. It refers to Cdns who reject the LIE-beral definition of an immigrant- see above definition. It is also used to describe any person who thinks it is unfair and undemocratic for LIE-berals to have two sets of rules- one set for the general public and another set for friends of LIE-beral party.

Entitlements: That body of perks, pay, pensions and assorted wonderful benefits which are the life blood of LIE-beral society. Such things are NOT available to an ordinary Cdn as there are not enough entitlements in the world to satisfy LIE-berals and thus it is the job of ordinary Cdns to work their lives away in a futile effort to supply all the entitlements that LIE-berals- with their vivid imagination and endless greed can dream up- with NO gravy left over for ordinary people.

Antifa: Another phrase coined by LIE-berals. It is a condensation of the phrase “anti fascist”. Members of Antifa follow LIE-beral logic in all things and consider that any opponent of their entitlements- see above- must be a dangerous fascist.

Fascist: Another word with two meanings. Traditionally a Fascist was a member of the German National Socialist Party created by Adolf Hitler. In more recent times, a fascist may be defined as a person who opposes LIE-beral Fake News and can also be identified as an Islamophobe. The modern “fascist” as envisioned by LIE-berals also opposes the LIE-beral list of entitlements.

NAFTA: Another word with several meanings. Traditionally NAFTA meant the “North American Free Trade Agreement” which was signed by Mexico, United States and Canada. Since the LIE-beral party under its leader- the idiot Boy Justin Trudope came to power- NAFTA has been used as a disparaging title to describe economic and military relations with United States that anti Yankee LIE-berals call unsatisfactory, Our idiot Boy Justin is leading us away from our long standing and healthy association with United States by destroying NAFTA as he seeks to implement the dream of his father Pierre - trying to destroy what Pierre called Cdn Imperialism.

The Trudopes see Imperial threats in all manner of places that other Cdns do not recognize. For instance, Pierre publicly told us that the war against Nazi Germany was “British Imperialism” Pierre also sought to limit our involvement in NATO during the Cold War against Soviet expansion so that American Imperialism would not be encouraged; though he had no fear of Soviet style Imperialism.

LIE-berals are currently engaged in playing silly games with Cdns and with Yankees attempting to re-negotiate NAFTA. Yankees are very worried that LIE-beral immigration will result in Muslim terror cells setting up in Canada and using our land as a base of operations against Yankees and want assurances LIE-berals will not allow such things to occur. LIE-berals refuse to accept that Yankees have any right to force their Islamophobic views on LIE-berals.
Cdns generally recognize that with 3000 dead in World Trade Centre and hundreds more dead in other Muslim attacks, Cdns mostly figure that Yankees have good reason to be fearful,

LIE-berals have discovered that simply sneering Islamophobe” at anybody who complains about LIE-beral stalling tactics used in the NAFTA negotiations will not be enough to protect them from political fallout if LIE-berals persuade Yankees to close the negotiations - and the border.

 

[Cannuck]

A time when people that didn't understand politics, shut the **** up or took the time to learn the issues

 

[spilledthebeer]

A time when people that didn't understand politics, shut the **** up or took the time to learn the issues

========================================================================================================


Better yet- what about the good old days BEFORE LIE-berals had to LIE about ALL their failing policies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Just look at the kind of censorship and DELIBERATE miss -representation of "fair use policies" that LIE-berals and their CBC buddies use to silence critics!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!






Here is an older article illustrating civil service union Hog greed and just how much support they are prepared to give to LIE-berals in exchange for gravy. With some comments of my own in brackets):

Hubert Lacroix, the president of the CBC, recently placed the future of the Canada’s national public broadcaster on the electoral map with comments aimed at sparking a renewed debate on future funding models. Lacroix disputed claims that low ratings are to blame for the CBC’s financial struggles, instead pointing to the need to consider alternative fee schemes, including new levies on Internet providers or supplementary charges on television purchases.

(So greedy CBC Hogs want to pick the pockets of other businesses in order to salvage their own suddenly shaky place on the LIE-beral gravy train! Why should internet providers be made to pay because their viewers and users have chosen to TURN OFF CBC tv and radio? And considering how widely and rapidly the CBC article mocking the LIE-beral MyDemocracy website as “a box of doughnuts” circulated- it is entirely CLEAR that Cdns will listen to CBC IF it ever finds anything else relevant to say! And that is the trouble- CBC is so busy spouting LIE-beral propaganda that it as NOTHING REAL to say!)

While disagreement over CBC funding is as old as the broadcaster itself, the more uncomfortable discussion for the CBC is its coverage of the 2015 election campaign — particularly its approach to national debates and political party advertising — which raises troubling questions about its relevance in the current media environment.

(Meaning the 2015 federal election that brought Our idiot Boy Justin to power- which featured regular media efforts to smear Conservatives and aid Our idiot Boy and his moronic minons!)

Most would agree that the CBC features an excellent group of reporters and boasts insightful analysts for its panel discussions. However, rather than working to make itself an invaluable resource for the election, the CBC has been unnecessarily restrictive in its broadcasting choices and in the use of its content.

The problem is obvious- CBC DOES NOT WANT informed voters- it wants LIE-beral voters! It jumped on the MyDemocracy website as a one off chance to temporarily show its faux impartiality- about a subject that other media was so scornful of that CBC felt compelled to jump on the band wagon in an effort to cover its own ass!)

The most puzzling decision has been its refusal to broadcast debates hosted by other organizations. The CBC may be disappointed with the debate approach adopted by the political parties in this campaign, but that does not change the sense that if the national public broadcaster does not air programs in the national public interest, it calls into question the very need for a public broadcaster. Indeed, the CBC seems to have cut its nose off to spite its face by doing its best to prove its critics right.

(CBC is being typically Hoggish in refusing to accept debate programing that it did not produce and does not approve of because it does not contain LIE-beral bias! LIE-berals consider suitable debate to be a series of easy questions lobbed gently at them so they can knock it out of the park! Real debate with actually facts is something LIE-berals increasingly SHUN! CBC recognizes- as all Hogs do- that LIE-beral victory- meaning MORE GRAVY- is also a win for CBC- thus CBC DOES NOT WANT any critical examination of LIE-beral policy- for fear of discovering the ROT at its heart!)

The CBC’s odd coverage choices are not limited to the missing debates. Its use of video clips from the debates has also been unnecessarily restrictive. For example, before analyzing the recent Munk debates on the “At Issue” panel, host Peter Mansbridge warned viewers that “we are limited with the excerpts with the amount we are allowed to show.” A similar warning preceded the discussion at other debates.

Yet the reality is that there was no need to be restrictive in the use of video clips. Canadian copyright law permits the use of copyrighted works without permission as part of the fair dealing clause. News reporting is one of the enumerated purposes and even expanded clips would easily qualify under a fair dealing analysis.

(So CBC lied about its policy of deliberately limiting public debate!)

(HEY THERE JAMES BONDO- I DO HOPE YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTOOD about using news clips and such AS THIS DOES MAKE YOU LOOK A FOOL!!!!! And it works for print media as well so long as the real author is given full credit as I always DO! And there is a further issue I am careful with- and that is NOT to put words into the mouth of another writer- it is for this reason that I always make it known that my comments are in brackets when I add words to an article!)

All news organizations are free to use as much of the video from debates as necessary to highlight key moments and positions of each leader. To suggest that the law creates significant limits on the ability to show debate clips is inaccurate.

In fact, the CBC’s misreading of the law is not limited to the use of clips within its news broadcasts.

Just prior to the election call, it asked YouTube and Facebook to remove a Conservative campaign advertisement that used clips from a CBC interview with Liberal leader Justin Trudeau. To support its takedown claim, the CBC argued that “no one – no individual candidate or political party, and no government, corporation or NGO – may re-use our creative and copyrighted property without our permission. This includes our brands, our talent and our content.”

That too is wrong.

(OH? MORE CBC/LIE-beral censorship and deliberate mis-representation of law and facts? And it relates to CBC being wrong about its crap on a paying site! Copyright law covering political comment on a FREE/NON profit site like this is even LOOSER! You have made yourself look foolish as usual!)

The law features important limitations on the rights of all copyright holders and all media organizations regularly rely on them in their reporting. The limits of copyright extend to campaign commercials and there is little that the CBC- or anyone else- can do about it.

With its rejection of the national debates, its limited use of debate clips and its attempts to limit re-use of its broadcast content, Canada’s national public broadcaster has marginalized itself during the election campaign at the very time that it could be demonstrating its relevance to the national political coverage.

(Worse- CBC has been caught deliberately trying to stack voter choice! Just as Our idiot Boy is trying to take over and paralyze our parliament with his idiot electoral reform!)

Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law.

(Geist has done us a favour by illustrating the ugly bias that CBC is trying to hide!)

 

[Jinentonix]

With the intention of promoting Cdn culture- here are some uniquely Cdn words and phrases- with their local meanings:
Logic: has two meanings., Firstly, as used by a Conservative it is a thought process designed to elicit a sensible and complete understanding of an issue. As used by a LIE-beral, it is a selective process designed to find facts that support a conclusion preferred by LIE-berals- while at the same time suppressing facts which do not fit the preferred LIE-beral conclusion.
Fake News: A body of one sided opinion- falsely masquerading as even handed analysis of a contentious issue and usually presented in support of LIE-beral policy and defended using the LIE-beral version of logic- see above.
Immigrant: Another word with several meanings depending on context. LIE-berals define an immigrant as a person born outside Canada, who has, for one reason or another, decided to become a Cdn citizen. LIE-berals insist that any and all human beings have the capacity to become good Cdn citizens if only we throw enough money their way.
Conservatives consider the LIE-beral definition of an immigrant to be Fake News and typical false LIE-beral logic. The Conservative definition splits immigrants seeking entry to Canada into two groups- those who have the morals, logic, language skills, education and political wisdom to integrate smoothly into our grossly indebted and over taxed economy- and others- selected by LIE-berals primarily for their willingness to support LIE-beral policy regardless of benefit to Canada. The immigrant selected by Conservatives is expected to be useful and helpful to the nation- not so for the LIE-beral candidate.
The immigrant chosen by a Conservative does not harbour hatred of western values and does not have the urge to change western society by violent means. The Conservative immigrant does not wish to end all our long standing economic and military alliances that have kept us safe since before Confederation; nor does he wish to force new alliances on us with nations and military action groups such as Iran, Hezzbollah and Taliban. The Conservative immigrant does not wish to force Sharia Law upon us and thus does not wish to reduce all women to the status of barefoot, pregnant, 18th century chattels. Any potential immigrant who demonstrates support for female genital mutilation, the beating of a woman who is deemed in need of “discipline” by an Imam, honour killings of women who have offended a man, or hatred of Jews will be rejected. Any immigrant chosen by Conservatives, who commits a criminal offense against Canada, will be stripped of citizenship and sent packing after completing a prison sentence.
By comparison, the LIE-beral immigration selection process is much simpler and much more selfish. The LIE-beral cares little for educational prowess nor for any sort of demonstrated habit of logic or religious tolerance in those they select. LIE-berals simply seek out those who can be relied upon to keep voting LIE-beral in future. In fact, LIE-berals consider well educated immigrants with a strong dedication to democracy and capitalism to be fossilized antiques left over from an age now dead and buried. Such success oriented persons who expect to stand on their own feet and reap a just reward for their honest labour have no place in the LIE-beral New Social Order that will arise once the Trudope family destroys what they see as Cdn Imperialism- as defined by father Pierre Trudope.
Islamophobia: A vague body of thought that has yet to be defined. The word was coined by LIE-berals and is used as an insult against persons who do not accept LIE-beral Fake News. Elements of Islamophobia include a fear of Muslim Radical groups who are dedicated to using terror and massacres of civilians to intimidate westerners into obeying the will of the World Wide Caliphate. Other elements of Islamophobia include a fear that Muslims in Canada will follow through with their stated aim of forcing Sharia Law- defined by Muslims as “the most perfect system” onto us- under threat of violence and criminal harassment.
The LIE-beral concept of Islamophobia is a slippery one to nail down- as it also contains personal elements uniquely related to LIE-beral Fake News. For instance, any person who demonstrates hostility to LIE-beral policy is usually referred to as an Islamphobe- it seems to be a verbal shorthand for any person who is defined as an enemy of LIE-berals.
Systemic racism: Another phrase coined by LIE-berals. It refers to Cdns who reject the LIE-beral definition of an immigrant- see above definition. It is also used to describe any person who thinks it is unfair and undemocratic for LIE-berals to have two sets of rules- one set for the general public and another set for friends of LIE-beral party.
Entitlements: That body of perks, pay, pensions and assorted wonderful benefits which are the life blood of LIE-beral society. Such things are NOT available to an ordinary Cdn as there are not enough entitlements in the world to satisfy LIE-berals and thus it is the job of ordinary Cdns to work their lives away in a futile effort to supply all the entitlements that LIE-berals- with their vivid imagination and endless greed can dream up- with NO gravy left over for ordinary people.
Antifa: Another phrase coined by LIE-berals. It is a condensation of the phrase “anti fascist”. Members of Antifa follow LIE-beral logic in all things and consider that any opponent of their entitlements- see above- must be a dangerous fascist.
Fascist: Another word with two meanings. Traditionally a Fascist was a member of the German National Socialist Party created by Adolf Hitler. In more recent times, a fascist may be defined as a person who opposes LIE-beral Fake News and can also be identified as an Islamophobe. The modern “fascist” as envisioned by LIE-berals also opposes the LIE-beral list of entitlements.
NAFTA: Another word with several meanings. Traditionally NAFTA meant the “North American Free Trade Agreement” which was signed by Mexico, United States and Canada. Since the LIE-beral party under its leader- the idiot Boy Justin Trudope came to power- NAFTA has been used as a disparaging title to describe economic and military relations with United States that anti Yankee LIE-berals call unsatisfactory, Our idiot Boy Justin is leading us away from our long standing and healthy association with United States by destroying NAFTA as he seeks to implement the dream of his father Pierre - trying to destroy what Pierre called Cdn Imperialism.
The Trudopes see Imperial threats in all manner of places that other Cdns do not recognize. For instance, Pierre publicly told us that the war against Nazi Germany was “British Imperialism” Pierre also sought to limit our involvement in NATO during the Cold War against Soviet expansion so that American Imperialism would not be encouraged; though he had no fear of Soviet style Imperialism.
LIE-berals are currently engaged in playing silly games with Cdns and with Yankees attempting to re-negotiate NAFTA. Yankees are very worried that LIE-beral immigration will result in Muslim terror cells setting up in Canada and using our land as a base of operations against Yankees and want assurances LIE-berals will not allow such things to occur. LIE-berals refuse to accept that Yankees have any right to force their Islamophobic views on LIE-berals.
Cdns generally recognize that with 3000 dead in World Trade Centre and hundreds more dead in other Muslim attacks, Cdns mostly figure that Yankees have good reason to be fearful,
LIE-berals have discovered that simply sneering Islamophobe” at anybody who complains about LIE-beral stalling tactics used in the NAFTA negotiations will not be enough to protect them from political fallout if LIE-berals persuade Yankees to close the negotiations - and the border.

Really dude? THAT'S your takeaway from my humorous post about chickens crossing the road? Seriously?

 

[spilledthebeer]

Really dude? THAT'S your takeaway from my humorous post about chickens crossing the road? Seriously?

========================================================================================================




The LIE-beral definition of democracy is badly flawed! For instance LIE-berals think it is undemocratic for Ford to cut the size of the bloated Toronto City Hall council without consulting with citizens. Yet LIE-berals think nothing of scorning us when we complain about the teeming tens of thousands of illegals LIE-berals have invited here over our many protests!

Ford asks us: “how many Cdns would want to trade in a bunch of city councillors in exchange for $25 million dollars in savings? LIE-berals do NOT want the answer to that one!

LIE-berals tell us that spending billions of dollars over a period of decades to tend to the swarms of illegals they are rounding up like stray cats is somehow good for us. But LIE-berals cannot honestly explain HOW this will be good for us!

LIE-berals insist they have the border crisis under control but how would they know? LIE-berals are currently using DNA testing on illegals in an effort to find out where the illegals came from and in hope of discovering if they might represent a national security threat- but considering that most third world countries are delighted to be rid of criminals- can we trust the security screening if third world govts refuse to give full information on a citizen?

This is not first time we have been warned about unreliable criminal records from third world countries. Twenty years ago RCMP warned Cdn govt of the unwillingness of Indian govt to help identify Indian criminals coming to Canada! Not that LIE-berals care about such things- if they did Our idiot Boy Justin wouold not have taken a convicted Sikh terrorist with him to india!

Ontari-owe LIE-berals told us three different numbers for their 2018 budget deficit- using accounting methods NEVER TAUGHT in any honest school of business, And now we have federal LIE-berals fudging the numbers on how many illegals have come here using exactly the same kind of fuzzy accounting. LIE-berals are using several lists for “illegals” and for “irregular border crossers, So how many hundred thousand illegals will we be dealing with by the time Our idiot Boy and his moronic minions are dumped from office?

WE should consider current LIE-beral immigration policy to be an unprecedented act of vandalism because so many of the illegals lack any language skills or education to survive in Canada without receiving massive amounts of ongoing govt aid that we cannot afford thanks to decades of LIE-beral debt! LIE-berals refuse either to discuss the real cost of keeping illegals or the cost of shipping them back where they came from- assuming we CAN figure out where they came from! And finding out where they came from will be so slow and costly and cumbersome that it is quite likely most of the illegals will die here of old age before any real action is taken!

LIE-beral immigration policy has burdened us with a social underclass that lacks the ability to survive without deceit and potentially criminal activity! After all if your first act upon entering a new country is to destroy all your documents and to LIE about who you are and where you came from it sets a BAD precedent for your future behaviour- doesn’t it!!!

Toronto City Hall liberals tell us that illegals who live and work in Toronto should be regarded as being part of our community and should be allowed to vote in our elections. Does that mean that I can break into the residence of John Tory and do his dishes and cut his grass when he is not home so I can become part of his family and he will then have to support me? Or will he call the cops and have me arrested for trespassing since I am not of a visible minority?

If I sneaked into Mexico from my home in Canada, would they let me vote in their elections if I wanted to?

LIE-berals insist that illegals who sneak into our country and work here illegally ARE CONTRIBUTING to our country and thus should be allowed to vote. Should we then count their vote according to what level of taxes they pay? And since illegals only pay sales tax on stuff they purchase- with NO income tax or health levy- though it does not stop them from using our health care with forged documents made by other illegals, and while sending their kids to our schools which they also do not pay for - how many thousands of illegal votes should we count up before admitting they are equal to ONE REAL full time tax payer?

LIE-berals say it is not fair that illegals work here but have no say in govt- but is it fair they get access to all manner of our services for FREE while LIE-berals look the other way?

If LIE-berals get their wish and illegals are allowed to vote- does that mean that LIE-berals will then accept a mass of Muslims swarming here and voting for Sharia Law?

Mexico has a law explicitly FORBIDDING foreigners from voting in their elections or influencing their elections in any way- how come LIE-berals do not count Mexicans as racists?

Pakistan went through a solid month of rioting in 2017 - with a hundred people killed and hundreds wounded because their Minister of Law forgot to properly thank Allah in a speech he made- and then refused to resign for slighting Allah. Does this mean that Muslims are religiously intolerant?

In 1964 a pile of 5 Yankee quarters- 25 cent pieces- contained an amount of silver that today in 2018 is worth $17.00 dollars. So which - a pocket full of those 1964 silver coins- and the LOW taxes of the time- or the current Ontari-owe minimum wage- plus the recent MASSIVE TAX INCREASES would you prefer to have? And who wants to tell me that LIE-beral meddling with our economy and the value of our money through inflation has been beneficial to ordinary people earning that minimum wage?

Considering the staggering debts being run up by our govt- and the probability of another devastating stock market crash is there any reason to save money at all?

And should we ask if investing in cheap ass GIC`s and govt bonds is a good idea? Especially considering the first thing the Greek govt did to cut costs and reduce debt was to STOP PAYING OUT for their govt bonds and GIC`s- meaning the small investors/ordinary people ate the biggest loss?

At what point do we agree that LIE-berals have proven you can steal more money with a pen than with a gun?

 

[Vbeacher]

A time when men were men and women were women.

 

[spilledthebeer]

A time when men were men and women were women.

========================================================================================================


And as we think of those long gone days- let us also think odf a time BEFORE we needed a translator and lie detector to decipher the crap LIE-berals spew at us!!!!!!!!!!


In the interest of promoting Cdn culture- I offer some translations of LIE-beral phrases:



“Idle No More”-(aka INM)- translation-title and catch phrase of a coalition of Cdn Aboriginal groups dedicated to a grossly irresponsible agenda that would, if fully implemented, bankrupt Canada. INM is mainly concerned with ensuring that a steady supply of govt money (a native version of the Gravy Train) continues to flow to reserves in spite of massive corruption, endemic waste and criminal abuse of tax money.

Those Cdns who find fault with INM refer to native scandals such as the Atiwapiskat housing crisis and to the Kashetchuwan water treatment plant disaster. The Conservative govt built both a drinking water plant and a sewage treatment plant in Kashetchuwan and trained natives to operate the plants. A bank account was also set up so that natives could hire more skilled white men from the south to make repairs that were beyond the skill set of natives. When both plants broke down it was then discovered that all the money earmarked for major repairs had ALREADY been spent sending a native hockey team with LOTS of adult supervisors to a tournament in California-air fare plus the cost of hotels, fine meals, alcohol and bad bets in area casinos ensured there would be no money for water plant repairs. INM blames racists in white govt for the lack of clean water in Kashetchuwan.

Conservative govt also gave Atiwapiskat band 105 million dollars to be used for building houses. In addition govt arranged to have De Beers-the diamond mining company that was operating in the area, donate` over 40 million dollars to Atiwapiskat. Yet in spite of having 150 million dollars donated to the band in a 5 year period, NOT a SINGLE NEW house was built and ALL the money has disappeared without a trace while Atiwapiskat town inhabitants live in hopeless squalid and frigid conditions. Cynics suggest that Atiwapiskat chief Teresa Spence has learned much from her counterparts in Kashetchuwan about how to hide money as there is not a single receipt in existence to show where the money went. And Spence and her band council blame white people for deplorable living conditions in Atiwapiskat.

Naturally conditions on native reserves are of concern to politicians. Conservative response has been to take a disciplined approach that would limit corruption and encourage a sensible and logical approach to native govt. LIE-berals have deliberately ignored any and all signs of gross corruption and fiscal negligence and are diligently trying to rebuild the trust of natives-by which they mean BUYING native votes without bothering to deal in any real way with the endemic corruption that is blighting life on the reserves. It would appear that LIE-berals have simply given up on natives and are inclined to let them stew in their own messes while extracting useful votes and staging photo `ops` where possible.


“Black Lives Matter” (aka BLM)-translation- this is a coalition of Black radical activists whose goal is the promotion of their rights and prerogatives- no matter the cost- to other members of society. BLM believes that any and all problems that afflict Black people are the result of systemic racism in Cdn society. They believe that the only solution to the problem of White bigotry is reverse discrimination on a massive scale. BLM is especially concerned with Police actions, training and values.

Questions from radical activists regarding alleged Police bigotry and Police relationship to mentally ill citizens would be more acceptable if radicals had not already persuaded LIE-berals to empty out virtually all the provincial mental health facilities-in the name of personal freedom and `civil rights` - and dump a pack of deranged persons onto the streets without proper supervision or even real access to much needed medication.

In addition. LIE-beral legislation now forbids a doctor to hospitalize a deranged person who has gone off their `meds`. Such a person must be allowed to deteriorate mentally until they are a demonstrated danger to themselves and others; and the burden of proof of such danger is now so high that the patient is often shot by police before getting treatment.

Sensible Police response to crazy people is further hampered by radical activists refusing to let Police have non lethal weapons in Toronto-weapons such as Tasers and bean bag shooting guns that would allow Police to knock down and disable knife waving nutbars instead of simply shooting them full of holes.

BLM Manifesto: A comprehensive list of demands designed to fully promote reverse discrimination and allow Black community spokespersons to launch a takeover of Cdn govt and act as the true power behind the democratic facade of elected public officials who would be reduced to rubber stamping BLM policies as ordered by the BLM shadow govt..

In addition, BLM criticism of Police would be more easily tolerated if a minority within BLM were not manipulating the main group by using Black anger as a smoke screen designed to use reverse discrimination to hamper legitimate Police investigation into crimes committed by Black criminals. Making a choice to become a drug dealer or Pimp instead of flipping burgers at McDonalds is certainly a career choice but being Black ought not to be a legal defense against arrest for drug and prostitution charges or assorted crimes of violence.

Sadly, the anti White bigots at BLM believes that the best way to promote racial harmony and minimize the number of mentally ill persons being shot in our streets is to ENTIRELY disarm the Police. BLM desires that all Police Officers shall be demoted to the status of disarmed and neutered/passive observers of community activity with no authority to act or interfere in any way unless given explicit instructions by BLM.

BLM does not wish to see any member of the Police Force-known to an older generation of Black activists as “The Occupying Army” interact with any member of the Black Community without first obtaining written permission from BLM. Such permission will spell out the details of permitted actions by police officers-the places where they may meet with Black people; the questions they may ask; the number of officers who may enter the community at any one time of day and etc.

BLM recognizes that there are sometimes divisions in the Black Community and BLM reserves the right to issue verbal orders to Police officers at short notice. If new verbal orders contradict earlier written orders then all Police Officers must immediately stand down and return to their nearest station house and remain there until consensus within the Black Community is reached and new orders issued.


“Political scandal”-translation-the phrase has two meanings depending on who employs it. Used by Conservatives it refers to some LIE-beral action such as gross misconduct or outright theft of govt money-refer to ORNG, E-Health, gas plants, Thunder Bay biomass electrical generation mess, Mars building, Green Energy fiasco, Sudbury bribery scandal, to name some of the more recent scandals.

Older LIE-beral scandals involve the theft of three billion dollars from the Human Resources Ministry, along with the bending of tax laws by LIE-beral finance minister Paul Martin in which the assets of his Canada Steamship Lines were moved out of the country and away from his own tax department-without the benefit of any tax levies being paid thanks to adroit use of loopholes Martin left in his own legislation.

When used by a LIE-beral the word scandal refers to the Mike Duffy trial in which Duffy-a rogue Conservative senator grossly misused public money until his Conservative party masters heard of it. At that point he was ordered to pay back the money but he refused-so Conservative party PAID what he owed and then took him to court in an attempt to recover their costs-LIE-berals think it is a scandal (and a very BAD political precedent) that a politician or political party would pay anything back to tax payers under any circumstances.

In politics, not all things that are outrageous can be classed as scandals. The LIE-beral senator MacDonald Harb has taken WAY MORE money than Mike Duffy ever did yet he has yet to be charged with anything and LIE-berals have made it clear THEY bear no responsibility for his debts-and they see no scandal in this.