Hawking's final science study released

[darkbeaver]

Earth is pock marked the same as the Moon we just have lots of obscuring shrubery and oceans hiding the craters.

 

[darkbeaver]

Secret History of Twin Planet Earth by Errol Hawkins, read that some time, it,s a facinating reconstruction of this planetary systems history. Many different orbital arrangements of this system are discussed.

 

[MHz]

No fancy instruments, ballons, or Internet....
Flat earth was invented by random globalist global warming internet experts to demean anyone attacking their religious beliefs ......

That would explain why I missed it. I was looking for a movement of failed fiction writers wanting to pull down a wage reserved for 'professionals'. Dead quiet for centuries then they are popping up everywhere, all with a 1080 an hour or more in length and all covering the same points and all are 'independent researchers'. That makes them as organized as some Churches and they come out with nothing bur wrong summations are you sure they could not be tagged up and this is a performance that would match Abbot and Costello

 

[MHz]

The orbit would be elliptical and I know of no confirmed circular planetary orbits. You,ve mentioned 3.5 billion years and 4 billion years as reliable planetary ages when in fact they are the crudest unreliable pegs anyone can mention, speculation of the basest type cooked up a century ago to support the Darwinian nuttyness.


I have more than an opinion about the plasma nature of the universe MHZ. You may be excited to learn that you also are an electrical organism and entirely dependant on carrying a proper charge in every cell of your body.

There is not a scrap of verifiable information about the age of any heavenly body excepting those having been witnessed in birth.

Only lightning strikes at 90 degrees.

Processing. . . .

With the earth a molten ball with a surface temp of 3,000F and being surrounded by ice at the temp of -200F I'm going to admit that there will be more activity going on that the rising air on mars that is causing a global dust storm that lasted a full year last time. When the crust was liquid to traces and when a proto crust was there and if the bolts were similar in size the largest would be the oldest as the crust was the thinnest and the smallest are when the crust was thicket and less damage done. If the moon had a proto atmosphere then the discharges would be similar and when the metal core went to the earth the lighter ball moving at the same speed and direction was enough that it started putting distance between themselves, at some point the tidal lock will be so small it should start rotating if the forces are there.
To be continued so don't rush a reply just yet.

 

[MHz]

Secret History of Twin Planet Earth by Errol Hawkins, read that some time, it,s a facinating reconstruction of this planetary systems history. Many different orbital arrangements of this system are discussed.

Without every planet having a similar one that we would be able to see I will leave this theory as a personal wish to find a place, close by, that has to be saner than this world and I can get there by leaving this world.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

On the moon the sheer number of perfectly round craters suggests the all hit at 90deg...

No, that's not how it works, most impacts regardless of their angle of incidence will produce circular craters, only the very shallowest of angles, on the order of a few degrees, will produce elongated craters. At the point of impact all the kinetic energy contained in the impactor is suddenly released, in effect it explodes and material gets thrown around about equally in all directions. That overwhelms any effects due to the angle of impact.

 

[MHz]

I'm willing to go with 90deg is the most common hit based in the motions involved only something at that angle would hit. Anything else would miss and have it's path changed so the next time it came by it hit. That being said, size does matter then, on the smaller ones especially, why is there no visible debris in the bottom of the hole.


With more on the far side how many are from the moon moving into the path of an object that was headed towards the earth and not the moon. That would also be after tidal lock was established



I have watch a lot of moon vids, only one covered out of round impacts and they are rare to say the least. A few rocks have left roll marks and one that rolled out of a crater must have been on the move horizontally when it landed and rolled to a stop a little ways away. Short topic as that is all I have seen.


How many of the lakes in Canada's north are impact marks? That is also some of the hardest and oldest rock on the planet to the dents were made when it was 'putty'. Some big ones are in Quebec and they were made by something big and slow or small and fast moving.


It's been awhile since I watched the Great Lake drained vid but they are oblong and very old so would they all be from a single impact where the incoming object broke apart?


Pop question. If the earth has a proto crust that is not cracked and 1,000 cubic miles or molten metal is sprinkled over the whole crust and gravity pulls it through the crust so it is in the molten part of the earth. Has the earth expanded as far as it is ever going to as you cannot compress a liquid of does it take up more area than that once it is at the core and it has not gained mass but it is hotter which means it should take up more volume as something always expands as it gets hotter.

Pressure also plays a role of some sort that I haven't even considered yet. At what temp does iron turn to a gas?

 

[Dexter Sinister]

I'm willing to go with 90deg is the most common hit based in the motions involved only something at that angle would hit.

A hit can happen at any angle greater than zero and less than or equal to 90 degrees, one at 90 degrees would be rare simply because there are so many other angles possible. Draw a circle and one diameter, then outside the circle sketch a bunch of lines parallel to the diameter that intersect the circle. All of those lines (in principle their number is infinite) are possible trajectories for incoming meteorites, and only one them impacts at 90 degrees.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

It's been awhile since I watched the Great Lake drained vid but they are oblong and very old so would they all be from a single impact where the incoming object broke apart?

The Great Lakes aren't impact craters.

 

[MHz]

I tend to see them as sinkholes, Hudson Bay and the GOM are also the same and eventually something like the Red Sea will connect them.

 

[MHz]

So far nobody has mentioned parachutes and Mars. If 14 miles is as high as you can deploy on earth and the ratio of the difference is known the answer should be solvable. If others do I cannot be cheating and I do fuk up so.


73920ft or 75,000 to round it off. The vid promotes the air pressure at the surface of mars is the same as it is at 120,000ft on earth, rounded off that means a chute on Mars will work 50,000ft earlier than it would on earth, why would anybody not question that? Let alone the collective here as they claims to be the smartest people here, so far the opposite is being shown to be true



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Mars
The atmosphere of the planet Mars is composed mostly of carbon dioxide. The atmospheric pressure on the Martian surface averages 600 pascals (0.087 psi; 6.0 mbar), about 0.6% of Earth's mean sea level pressure of 101.3 kilopascals (14.69 psi; 1.013 bar). It ranges from a low of 30 pascals (0.0044 psi; 0.30 mbar) on Olympus Mons's peak to over 1,155 pascals (0.1675 psi; 11.55 mbar) in the depths of Hellas Planitia. This pressure is well below the Armstrong limit for the unprotected human body. Mars's atmospheric mass of 25 teratonnes compares to Earth's 5148 teratonnes; Mars has a scale height of 11.1 kilometres (6.9 mi)[2] versus Earth's 8.5 kilometres (5.3 mi).[3]

 

[Dexter Sinister]

I tend to see them as sinkholes, Hudson Bay and the GOM are also the same and eventually something like the Red Sea will connect them.

The Great Lakes aren't sinkholes, neither is Hudson Bay, and I don't know what you mean by the GOM. It's also extremely unlikely that they'll ever be connected, the land would have to subside significantly for that to happen, and the land is rising. Most of Canada is rising at the rate of a few millimetres per year in response to the removal of the ice load around 10K years ago, a process called isostatic rebound, and that's going to go on for a long time.

 

[petros]

GOM = Gulf of Mexico

 

[MHz]

The Great Lakes aren't sinkholes, neither is Hudson Bay, and I don't know what you mean by the GOM. It's also extremely unlikely that they'll ever be connected, the land would have to subside significantly for that to happen, and the land is rising. Most of Canada is rising at the rate of a few millimetres per year in response to the removal of the ice load around 10K years ago, a process called isostatic rebound, and that's going to go on for a long time.

The channel is the same in the Mississippi River followed, river valleys always get deeper. I'm talking on the same scale as the new African Rift becoming as large as the Red Sea is today. Another process at work is the line mentioned would be where the magma from the Pacific Rift and the Atlantic Rift meet, it can push the crust up but the magma is going down and without some vent all the way to the surface the crust us going to bend in that direction that rock will be fracturing itself. The mountain chain is lower due to that than from erosion by wind and snow.


Here is a vid about the Great Lakes that should push the theme glaciers scooped the holes out. Let me know if supports your version. there is no vid for my version so I will have to use that model and point to what is different

Drain the Great Lakes

 

[coldstream]

I had go at Brief History of Time a few years ago.

Couldn't make hide nor hair of it.

It seems to me the entire academic bureacracy of Cosmology has gone the route of AGW in the last few years. It's become a religion that is increasingly removed from experiment, empirical evidence, utility. It's difficult to think of one practical technology that has come from the science since WW2. A science that has lost its link to technological innovation has lost it fundamental inspiration.

It resembles more and more a Church whose postulates must be accepted on the basis of faith alone, and, credulity accorded to its priestly caste.. like Stephen Hawking.

 

[MHz]

'How the earth was made' is a 10 part series that is as current as it gets. I don't agree with everything they promote but I haven't seen anything better.

These 2 maps will help explain my theory, the Great lakes are very old and very old rocks are very hard so 5 glacial periods is not going to dig a deep hole and leave it empty as it retreats. The best example I can use is it didn't happen in Alberta and a glacier is a glacier.
If the ice was 2 miles deep what was the depth every 100 miles all the way back to the global North Pole. I tend to think the coasts got lots of snow and then the wind blew it wherever rather than it snowed very much as all the moisture would fall out of the air as soon as it lost it;s heat. There is no link for that either.
The map below is just showing all the red areas are rifts where magma flows away in both directions, what is missing is where they meet.

 

[MHz]

I had go at Brief History of Time a few years ago.

Couldn't make hide nor hair of it.

It seems to me the entire academic bureacracy of Cosmology has gone the route of AGW in the last few years. It's become a religion that is increasingly removed from experiment, empirical evidence, utility. It's difficult to think of one practical technology that has come from the science since WW2. A science that has lost its link to technological innovation has lost it fundamental inspiration.

It resembles more and more a Church whose postulates must be accepted on the basis of faith alone, and, credulity accorded to its priestly caste.. like Stephen Hawking.

Science was not gone over with a fine tooth comb when it entered something as a fact. You cannot dismiss that is some of the biggest projects came with a summation of the finding it would find came with the pallet of cash and before any experiments were done. Today anybody can become an expert in anything for 15 minutes at least. You might be able to fool some of the people but when you don't fool them all somebody will start talking a and unless the rest are true retards they will tend to want the true version than the lie, no matter what reason is given for implementing that change and making sure it was kept as well hidden as possible.



If there are other vids available watching them might improve the clarity and the overall honesty. I have seen in a few cases that each of 4 different vids has an opposing view or a point it makes is more logical if it is applied against a point made in one of the other ones.


Do a youtube search with the filter set filter out the older ones. Better graphics rather than the story is changed a lot

 

[Dexter Sinister]

The channel is the same in the Mississippi River followed, river valleys always get deeper. I'm talking on the same scale as the new African Rift becoming as large as the Red Sea is today.

Ah, okay, you're also talking about a timescale of tens of millions of years then too. I've never heard of any rifting going on down the Mississippi Valley, and the landscape certainly doesn't look like that's happening. In times past there have been shallow seas in the centre of the continent, but not due to anything like the rifting going on in east Africa.

Here is a vid about the Great Lakes that should push the theme glaciers scooped the holes out. Let me know if supports your version.

Yeah, that looks like good science to me. The narration's a little over-dramatized and repetitive, but the evidence and the arguments presented seem legitimate to me. Unless of course all those experts from assorted universities and the Geological Survey and whatnot are all frauds, but I saw no reason to think they are.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

A science that has lost its link to technological innovation has lost it fundamental inspiration.

I don't think that's true at all. Technological innovation is not science's fundamental inspiration, it's more about the pleasure of finding things out. Most science is done with nobody having a clue what technologies might come out of it, and technological innovation in fact cannot be the goal of fundamental science. Michael Faraday and James Maxwell working in the 19th century were just finding things out about electricity and magnetism, nobody foresaw our modern electrified world that their work enabled.

 

[darkbeaver]

I had go at Brief History of Time a few years ago.

Couldn't make hide nor hair of it.

It seems to me the entire academic bureacracy of Cosmology has gone the route of AGW in the last few years. It's become a religion that is increasingly removed from experiment, empirical evidence, utility. It's difficult to think of one practical technology that has come from the science since WW2. A science that has lost its link to technological innovation has lost it fundamental inspiration.

It resembles more and more a Church whose postulates must be accepted on the basis of faith alone, and, credulity accorded to its priestly caste.. like Stephen Hawking.

coldstream;2670229]I had go at Brief History of Time a few years ago.

Couldn't make hide nor hair of it.

Hawkings disease was far more damageing than what s normally understood and he was elevated to sainthood by that very same church you have mentioned. It is suspected in some quarters that he was incapable of sentient thought for his entire last decade.



I got BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME when first it was offered in soft cover thinking perhaps the full tome could by weight alone illuminate more completely. I was wrong. I still haven,t managed to foist the mangled fairey tale on some unsuspecting party.
There are no black holes there are no other universes there are no event horizons and Big Bangs from dimensionless points cannot ever happen.
After some time I came to realize that Hawkings wasn,t a lone agent in The Church of Science and that the truth is very often not shared with the masses.