Muslims were slave traders....
https://www.newstatesman.com/intern...rab-countries-pay-reparations-slave-trade-too
https://www.newstatesman.com/intern...rab-countries-pay-reparations-slave-trade-too
You really hate the Jews.
- Thread starter MHz
- Start date
Of course they do Dear. odd they haven't picked you up yet.
They got some of my ancestors, Took so many once that it flooded the market selling them for a pouch of tobacco
But Anywhooo
Libya In Turmoil And Slave Trade Flourishing: Thanks Obama and Hillary [VIDEO]
But Anywhooo
Libya In Turmoil And Slave Trade Flourishing: Thanks Obama and Hillary [VIDEO]
I have to assume the pouch was made from the same body parts that the Union Soldiers used and that gave it some added value.
The anti semistic exist only current year down to 1940's but in the old time it weren't Israel do declar war against Germany it was Germany wanted kill whole religion Jewish in thus case it was big killing time against foreign religion Jewish big mistake of the U.S. and Canada to got involved in the war 2 against 1 in Europe but as everybody knew America can not take alone Germany of WW2 Germany isnt weaker than the U.S. in matching war duell.
I like many:
Cigarette
Musicial
Mommy
Drinking
Western
Lucifer
Löfven
Macron
Democracy
Socialism
Biden to choise '20
Communist
Skinheads
Cigarette
Musicial
Mommy
Drinking
Western
Lucifer
Löfven
Macron
Democracy
Socialism
Biden to choise '20
Communist
Skinheads
I'm not sure if you understand what happens when a nation tells the World Bank they decline to help when asked.
The bankers would be about 3% of all Jews, The rest add their moral support or the get treated like Judge Goldstone was after his UN report was published.
Cuba is a decent example what would happen, that Venezuela is suffering the same fate it shows being wealthy will not save you simply because nobody will sell anything to you and local food production is the first thing destroyed when the come in with fat pocketbooks and claiming to be there to help, help themselves is how it turns out every time.
It works after breaking ties with the Rothschild banks. That is why all the sanctions are applied. If Socialism was as bad as Walnut and Pete make it out to be there would be no need to apply sanctions as it should fall down all by itself.
Sanctions cannot be applied to a capitalist nations because it is already a two class system so sanction would just be passed onto the 'Consumers' and the Merchants can do whatever they want without any backlash coming their way. High death rates for consumers is not something that needs fixing as far as the merchants are concerned.
Anti semistic exist before of course current seat are in Middle East and surelly still Germany but Germany has American nuclears abroad so Israel can not hurt Germany also thus days.
Was this 'blowing the whistle' or just another anti-semite blowing hot air?
Discuss, . . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U58RCskhQwU&t=124s
Inverted Reality & The Authoritative Narrative Of The Corporate Media The mainstream media is seen by most as authoritative, so in truth those who control the media control the narrative. This begs the question who does control the media? (this list may be outdated) "Today, seven Jewish Americans run the vast majority of US television networks, the printed press, the Hollywood movie industry, the book publishing industry, and the recording industry. Most of these industries are bundled into huge media conglomerates run by the following seven individuals: Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited Those seven Jewish men collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records". I would venture to say that these seven men would identify themselves as Zionists (supporters of the state of Israel). Supporting Israel is fine, but not when you control the media, and the minds of so many unwitting Americans as to the Zionist agenda. Understanding the above may help you to understand who benefits from the events of 9/11/01, and the ensuing clash of civilizations, better known as the war on terror. In reality you have been authoritatively told to fear and hate Muslims, my purpose or agenda is to get you to question authority? I hope that the reason is obvious to you. Your reality has been created for you, by the Zionist controlled media. Israel is in big trouble, because of the brutal way in which it was created. The land the Zionists occupy (all of Palestine) was stolen from its mostly Arab population. The inversion of reality that the corporate media is trying to convince the rest of the world of, is that the Arabs are the terrorists, when in fact it has always been the Zionists Jews. This knowledge is but a seed of thought that I hope will grow within fertile minds, those that are capable of critical thinking. You are being controlled by fear, fear of terrorism, fear of Muslims, fear of Sharia Law and the annihilation of your/our way of life. Like 9/11 the Syrian refugee crisis was manufactured, as is ISIS, and Syria's so called civil war. The Zionists need terrorists and chaos so they created it. They need it to implement their plans for the completion of the Rothschild's Greater Israel Project. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXehd...
Discuss, . . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U58RCskhQwU&t=124s
Inverted Reality & The Authoritative Narrative Of The Corporate Media The mainstream media is seen by most as authoritative, so in truth those who control the media control the narrative. This begs the question who does control the media? (this list may be outdated) "Today, seven Jewish Americans run the vast majority of US television networks, the printed press, the Hollywood movie industry, the book publishing industry, and the recording industry. Most of these industries are bundled into huge media conglomerates run by the following seven individuals: Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited Those seven Jewish men collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records". I would venture to say that these seven men would identify themselves as Zionists (supporters of the state of Israel). Supporting Israel is fine, but not when you control the media, and the minds of so many unwitting Americans as to the Zionist agenda. Understanding the above may help you to understand who benefits from the events of 9/11/01, and the ensuing clash of civilizations, better known as the war on terror. In reality you have been authoritatively told to fear and hate Muslims, my purpose or agenda is to get you to question authority? I hope that the reason is obvious to you. Your reality has been created for you, by the Zionist controlled media. Israel is in big trouble, because of the brutal way in which it was created. The land the Zionists occupy (all of Palestine) was stolen from its mostly Arab population. The inversion of reality that the corporate media is trying to convince the rest of the world of, is that the Arabs are the terrorists, when in fact it has always been the Zionists Jews. This knowledge is but a seed of thought that I hope will grow within fertile minds, those that are capable of critical thinking. You are being controlled by fear, fear of terrorism, fear of Muslims, fear of Sharia Law and the annihilation of your/our way of life. Like 9/11 the Syrian refugee crisis was manufactured, as is ISIS, and Syria's so called civil war. The Zionists need terrorists and chaos so they created it. They need it to implement their plans for the completion of the Rothschild's Greater Israel Project. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXehd...
It is a scam that nets them cash and other gifts not earned, 'money for nothing' is their theme song. That is why fiat banking was invented.
Other that confirming God doesn't like you in your present form this might show where the ones you hold in high esteem are really from.
My what big teeth you don't have.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG_bACkcDL8&list=PL964ED507CB398291&bpctr=1540692997
Former US senator and author David Duke eloquently explains the Jewish character of what is erroneously called the Russian Mafia. Vote BNP, we are the only ones in Britain willing to do something about the colossal peril our great Western Civilization faces.
If I try to leave them and mention banking that is being an anti-semite in your opinion, Right? For the sake of the post let's say you could have thought and moved on to do a troll post on my next post where they were identified by something better than 'them'. Bankers are about 3% of the Jews and that is who you defend with all your dumb-ass posts.
I run on 'facts', post something a bit more authoritative than your opinion because I am a steam roller and you are an ant on crutches if you can't. Even you being as slow as you are will catch on at some point, not everybody that says you are a friend is really your friend. I could be finishing up my long post instead of your crappy, 'Look at me.' posts.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2014/10/21/truth-and-fiction-in-elie-wiesels-night/
A couple of weeks ago Elie Wiesel, Nobel laureate and self-appointed moral conscience for Holocaust survivors, praised the expulsion of Palestinians from their homes to make way for yet more illegal settlements in Jerusalem. His chilling statement ran in an ad placed in Ha’aretz. Here are Wiesel’s appalling words:
–Jeffrey St. Clair
When in trouble, head for Auschwitz, preferably in the company of Elie Wiesel. It’s as foolproof a character reference as is available today, at least within the Judeo-Christian sphere of moral influence. One can easily see why Oprah Winfrey and her advisers saw an Auschwitz excursion in the company of Wiesel as a sure-fire antidote to salve the wounds sustained by Oprah’s Book Club when it turned out that James Frey had faked significant slabs of his own supposedly autobiographical saga of moral regeneration, A Million Little Pieces.
Published in 2003, Frey’s irksome book swiftly became a cult classic. (The present author was offered it in the summer of 2004 by a young relative, presumably to assist in his moral regeneration, but after glancing through a few pages returned it, on the grounds that it wasn’t his kind of thing.) Winfrey picked it for her Book Club in September 2005, and it rocketed to the top of the bestseller lists.
For Frey the sky fell in when, on January 7, 2006, the Smoking Gun website published documents showing that Frey had fabricated many facts about himself, including a criminal record. There were later charges of plagiarism. Frey ran through a benign gauntlet of trial-by-Larry King on January 11, and Oprah called in to stand by her Pick of the Month. She said that what mattered was not whether Frey’s book was true (the Fundamentalist claim for the Holy Bible) but its value as a therapeutic tool (the modern Anglican position on the Good Book).
But by now every columnist and books page editor in America was wrestling the truth-or-fiction issue to the ground. Oprah turned on Frey. On her show on January 26, he clung to the ropes, offering the excuse that the “demons” that had driven him to drink and drugs had also driven him into claiming that everything he wrote about himself was true. Publishers including Random House, which has made millions off him, had rejected the book when he’d initially offered it as a “fiction novel”. Oprah brushed this aside.
“Say it’s all true” is what demons often whisper in an author’s ear. Ask T.E. Lawrence. Did the Bey of Deraa really rape him? Lawrence suggests it in the Seven Pillars of Wisdom in paragraphs of fervent masochistic reminiscence. This and other adventures in Lawrence’s account of British scheming in Mesopotamia against the Ottomans met with the ecstatic admiration of the Oxford-based equivalent of Oprah’s Book Club back in the early 1920s, after Lawrence had the 350,000-word “memoir” privately printed and circulated. He’d written an earlier version in 1919 but claimed this had been stolen while he was changing trains in Reading, on the way to Oxford from London. (Reading has surely been the site of more supposed thefts and losses of “completed manuscripts” and PhD dissertations — “I didn’t make a copy!” — than any railway station in the world.)
Half a century later it occurred to Colin Simpson and Phillip Knightley of the London Sunday Times to ask the supposed rapist for his side of the story. They hurried off to Turkey and tracked down the town to which the Bey had retired, arriving at his home only to learn he’d died not long before. Relatives told the British reporters that the Bey would not have found Lawrence appetizing prey. The Turk was a noted womanizer, and when in Mesopotamia was always getting the clap from consorting with whores on his excursions to Damascus.
It’s fun to think of Oprah grilling Lawrence about his claims, freshly exposed on Smoking Gun, telling him she felt “really duped” but that, “more importantly, I feel that you betrayed millions of Orientalizing masochists who believed you”.
But hardly had Frey been cast down from the eminence of Amazon.com’s top bestseller before he was replaced at number one by the new pick of Oprah’s Book Club, Elie Wiesel’s Night, which had the good fortune to see republication at this fraught moment in Oprah’s literary affairs. Simultaneous with the Night selection came news that Oprah Winfrey and Elie Wiesel would shortly be visiting Auschwitz together, from which vantage point Oprah, with the lugubrious Wiesel at her side, could emphasize for her ABC-TV audience that there is truth and there is fiction, that Auschwitz is historical truth at its bleakest and most terrifying, that Night is a truthful account and that Wiesel is the human embodiment of truthful witness.
(in part)
A couple of weeks ago Elie Wiesel, Nobel laureate and self-appointed moral conscience for Holocaust survivors, praised the expulsion of Palestinians from their homes to make way for yet more illegal settlements in Jerusalem. His chilling statement ran in an ad placed in Ha’aretz. Here are Wiesel’s appalling words:
“As Sukkot begins, we are thrilled to bless the tens of new families joining us at this time in the Jewish settlement in the City of David. We salute the Zionist action in Jerusalem of those involved. Strengthening the Jewish presence in Jerusalem is a challenge that we all face and with this act of settlement you are raising our stature. Together with you we will receive the pilgrims, the holiday visitors. We value and cherish you.”
Though Wiesel offers himself as a paragon of moral virtue, the truth is somewhat seamier. As detailed in this myth-shattering piece by Alexander Cockburn from the February 2006 print edition of CounterPunch, Wiesel assiduously campaigned for the Nobel Prize and has for decades tried to pass off his short book “Night” as a true account–a “testimony” in his words– of his experiences at Auschwitz, even though key scenes in the book have been exposed as fiction.
–Jeffrey St. Clair
When in trouble, head for Auschwitz, preferably in the company of Elie Wiesel. It’s as foolproof a character reference as is available today, at least within the Judeo-Christian sphere of moral influence. One can easily see why Oprah Winfrey and her advisers saw an Auschwitz excursion in the company of Wiesel as a sure-fire antidote to salve the wounds sustained by Oprah’s Book Club when it turned out that James Frey had faked significant slabs of his own supposedly autobiographical saga of moral regeneration, A Million Little Pieces.
Published in 2003, Frey’s irksome book swiftly became a cult classic. (The present author was offered it in the summer of 2004 by a young relative, presumably to assist in his moral regeneration, but after glancing through a few pages returned it, on the grounds that it wasn’t his kind of thing.) Winfrey picked it for her Book Club in September 2005, and it rocketed to the top of the bestseller lists.
For Frey the sky fell in when, on January 7, 2006, the Smoking Gun website published documents showing that Frey had fabricated many facts about himself, including a criminal record. There were later charges of plagiarism. Frey ran through a benign gauntlet of trial-by-Larry King on January 11, and Oprah called in to stand by her Pick of the Month. She said that what mattered was not whether Frey’s book was true (the Fundamentalist claim for the Holy Bible) but its value as a therapeutic tool (the modern Anglican position on the Good Book).
But by now every columnist and books page editor in America was wrestling the truth-or-fiction issue to the ground. Oprah turned on Frey. On her show on January 26, he clung to the ropes, offering the excuse that the “demons” that had driven him to drink and drugs had also driven him into claiming that everything he wrote about himself was true. Publishers including Random House, which has made millions off him, had rejected the book when he’d initially offered it as a “fiction novel”. Oprah brushed this aside.
“Say it’s all true” is what demons often whisper in an author’s ear. Ask T.E. Lawrence. Did the Bey of Deraa really rape him? Lawrence suggests it in the Seven Pillars of Wisdom in paragraphs of fervent masochistic reminiscence. This and other adventures in Lawrence’s account of British scheming in Mesopotamia against the Ottomans met with the ecstatic admiration of the Oxford-based equivalent of Oprah’s Book Club back in the early 1920s, after Lawrence had the 350,000-word “memoir” privately printed and circulated. He’d written an earlier version in 1919 but claimed this had been stolen while he was changing trains in Reading, on the way to Oxford from London. (Reading has surely been the site of more supposed thefts and losses of “completed manuscripts” and PhD dissertations — “I didn’t make a copy!” — than any railway station in the world.)
Half a century later it occurred to Colin Simpson and Phillip Knightley of the London Sunday Times to ask the supposed rapist for his side of the story. They hurried off to Turkey and tracked down the town to which the Bey had retired, arriving at his home only to learn he’d died not long before. Relatives told the British reporters that the Bey would not have found Lawrence appetizing prey. The Turk was a noted womanizer, and when in Mesopotamia was always getting the clap from consorting with whores on his excursions to Damascus.
It’s fun to think of Oprah grilling Lawrence about his claims, freshly exposed on Smoking Gun, telling him she felt “really duped” but that, “more importantly, I feel that you betrayed millions of Orientalizing masochists who believed you”.
But hardly had Frey been cast down from the eminence of Amazon.com’s top bestseller before he was replaced at number one by the new pick of Oprah’s Book Club, Elie Wiesel’s Night, which had the good fortune to see republication at this fraught moment in Oprah’s literary affairs. Simultaneous with the Night selection came news that Oprah Winfrey and Elie Wiesel would shortly be visiting Auschwitz together, from which vantage point Oprah, with the lugubrious Wiesel at her side, could emphasize for her ABC-TV audience that there is truth and there is fiction, that Auschwitz is historical truth at its bleakest and most terrifying, that Night is a truthful account and that Wiesel is the human embodiment of truthful witness.
(in part)
https://www.presstv.com/Detail/2018...estinian-children-war-crime-says-PLO-official
A senior member of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) has strongly condemned an Israeli airstrike near the eastern border of the Gaza Strip, which left three Palestinian children dead, describing it as an “ongoing war crime.”
The minors were killed for allegedly attempting to sabotage the border fence between the blockaded coastal enclave and Israeli-occupied territories, and being involved in placing an improvised explosive device adjacent to it.
A senior member of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) has strongly condemned an Israeli airstrike near the eastern border of the Gaza Strip, which left three Palestinian children dead, describing it as an “ongoing war crime.”
“The occupying Israeli army has been deliberately targeting and killing Palestinian children. This is a clear war crime in violation of international law and international humanitarian law,” Hanan Ashrawi, a member of the PLO's executive committee, said on Monday.
“Israel's continuous campaign of excessive and indiscriminate violence against the people of Gaza has persisted with impunity and has been emboldened by the US administration's strategic alliance with Israel,” she added.
Khaled Bassam Abu Saeed, 14, 13-year-old Abdul-Hamid Mohammed Abu Zaher, and Mohammed Ibrahim al-Sutari, 13, were killed in an Israeli aerial assault on Gaza last night.“Israel's continuous campaign of excessive and indiscriminate violence against the people of Gaza has persisted with impunity and has been emboldened by the US administration's strategic alliance with Israel,” she added.
The minors were killed for allegedly attempting to sabotage the border fence between the blockaded coastal enclave and Israeli-occupied territories, and being involved in placing an improvised explosive device adjacent to it.