Maybe this will help NB decide if they need some pipes from AB
http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/...nadas-largest-oil-refinery-as-energy-company/
http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/...nadas-largest-oil-refinery-as-energy-company/
B.C. gets a north coast export project — with pipeline
- Thread starter B00Mer
- Start date
Do you have a problem with the LNG plants they are setting up on the East Coast, and the pipelines are in place from West to East and South to North
6 East Coast Export Terminals
Goldboro LNG
(Nova Scotia)
20 Years
10 Mtpa – 1.4 Bcf/d
$8.3
Bear Head LNG
(Nova Scotia)
25 Years
12 Mtpa – 1.6 Bcf/d
$2-$8
A C LNG
(Nova Scotia)
25 Years
15 Mtpa – 2.1 Bcf/d
$3
Energie Saguenay (Quebec)
25 Years
11 Mtpa – 1.6 Bcf/d
$7
Stolt LNGaz (Quebec)
25 Years
0.5 Mtpa – 0.7 Bcf/d
$0.6
TUGLIQ Gaz Naturel Quubec Inc. (Quebec)
Applying
0.8 Mtpa – 0.1 Bcf/d
Not at all, my posts were about importing oil from other nations to support their bottom line at the expense of Canadians that don't live in the east. The price Canadians get for oil is already below 'the norm' so I see no reason that trend will change when NG is the commodity.
Same as the US importing coal from other countries, it helps their bottom line and keeps some towns operation like a good company town does. The amount it makes for the owners is whatever the employees spend a month to live. On a month to month survival rate much to the glee of the elites that are also capitalists. You know the one where the 'owners' get everything and the employees are given the worst conditions possible.
Your link didn't specify who the customers were, the link I found said the US was our only customer, which seems a bit odd.
Something like this old story.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/rep...lng-inks-asian-sales-contract/article7563307/
If we ship NG to the US and the US exports NG how is it the US is not selling the gas we send them. Like Quebec buys poser from NFLD and jacks the rate before they sell it to the US. You know, one of the many 'money for nothing' things that is a mainstay of a capitalist society.
http://www.lngexports.com/#/?section=why-export-lng
The United States is now the leading natural gas producer in the world. We have an abundant supply of this clean, affordable and reliable resource that will let us power our nation for generations to come. Just a few years ago the U.S. was expected to be a major importer of natural gas. The shale revolution has virtually eliminated our need for gas imports, and we have begun to export some of our gas. The first shipment of U.S. LNG from the lower 48 states left in February 2016 and since then the U.S. has shipped LNG to Europe, Asia and South America. Our abundant supply means that the U.S. does not have to import significant amounts of LNG for domestic use, creating greater certainty of supply and putting downward pressure on prices around the world.
(in part)
The chart below sees CND exports being about the same any increase if by US efforts. If the shale flops the black-line would be the US line and the increase would come from Canadian NG that is simply marketed as a US product
The profits saved would go to 'big gas'.
Same as the US importing coal from other countries, it helps their bottom line and keeps some towns operation like a good company town does. The amount it makes for the owners is whatever the employees spend a month to live. On a month to month survival rate much to the glee of the elites that are also capitalists. You know the one where the 'owners' get everything and the employees are given the worst conditions possible.
Your link didn't specify who the customers were, the link I found said the US was our only customer, which seems a bit odd.
Something like this old story.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/rep...lng-inks-asian-sales-contract/article7563307/
If we ship NG to the US and the US exports NG how is it the US is not selling the gas we send them. Like Quebec buys poser from NFLD and jacks the rate before they sell it to the US. You know, one of the many 'money for nothing' things that is a mainstay of a capitalist society.
http://www.lngexports.com/#/?section=why-export-lng
The United States is now the leading natural gas producer in the world. We have an abundant supply of this clean, affordable and reliable resource that will let us power our nation for generations to come. Just a few years ago the U.S. was expected to be a major importer of natural gas. The shale revolution has virtually eliminated our need for gas imports, and we have begun to export some of our gas. The first shipment of U.S. LNG from the lower 48 states left in February 2016 and since then the U.S. has shipped LNG to Europe, Asia and South America. Our abundant supply means that the U.S. does not have to import significant amounts of LNG for domestic use, creating greater certainty of supply and putting downward pressure on prices around the world.
(in part)
The chart below sees CND exports being about the same any increase if by US efforts. If the shale flops the black-line would be the US line and the increase would come from Canadian NG that is simply marketed as a US product
The profits saved would go to 'big gas'.
Last edited:
Hereditary chiefs have no power and are just looking for new pickups and snowmobiles for this winter.
Whiteman's greed would top that by 10/1 at least. How many 'too good to be true' plans are 'too good to be true'? We get headlines, Russia is building things at a record pace. This the 'circle the wagons' time cause the buffalo herd ran off over the horizon.
https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201810091068737791-putin-dark-secret/
In fact, Kudlow's plan has two serious flaws. Despite US pressure on the European Union, Nord Stream 2 is being successfully built and, according to Gazprom, the capital investments required for the gas pipeline project have already been almost 70 percent financed. It will be extremely difficult to stop Nord Stream 2 at this stage, because if necessary, the Russian side could complete it at its own expense.
https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201810091068737791-putin-dark-secret/
In fact, Kudlow's plan has two serious flaws. Despite US pressure on the European Union, Nord Stream 2 is being successfully built and, according to Gazprom, the capital investments required for the gas pipeline project have already been almost 70 percent financed. It will be extremely difficult to stop Nord Stream 2 at this stage, because if necessary, the Russian side could complete it at its own expense.