That is essentially the point we have been trying to make. How do you want to define fair share?
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
That is essentially the point we have been trying to make. How do you want to define fair share?
Let's say a Corp has a profit of $1,000,000. A chunk goes to the Feds, the Province and Municipality.
Call it 25% for the sake of example.
Say the Corp has 1000 shares and each share gets a dividend of $750.
That $750 in Joe Blow's hands now gets taxed again at the personal income tax rate so in reality almost half that Corporation's income went to Govt.
The point is the rich pay less. The poor paying more is just gravy.
No they don't. Taxes are on a sliding scale. You've heard the term " the more you make the more they take" haven’t you?
2016 Federal income tax rates. $45,282 or less. 15% $45,282 to $90,563. 20.5% $90,563 to $140,388. 26% $140,388 to $200,000. 29% More than $200,000. 33% * These amounts are adjusted for inflation and other factors in each tax year.
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.
And Carbon Tax.Add in payroll taxes, business licensing and the various contributions like CPP or EI.
That % figure changes upwards
flat taxes infer to me that poor people pay more. We currently graduate the system so that the more you make the more you pay, therefore if the system changes to a single rate it must rise for those in the lowest brackets.
And Carbon Tax.
Why isn't fair for all tax payers pay their proportionate fair share we all enjoy the same amount of services, in fact the lowest income persons probably enjoy more services than the upper income persons
Seeing how we're talking fairness here, what say that everyone, regardless of the # on your tax return, gets a GST rebate cheque.
... That would be fair, right?
Let's say a Corp has a profit of $1,000,000. A chunk goes to the Feds, the Province and Municipality.
Why is proportion of income the standard for fairness? Why not number of children or age?
Municipalities don't tax profits. **** you're a moron
Why is proportion of income the standard for fairness? Why not number of children or age?
Why wouldn't that be included in the tax deduction portion of the income tax?
Dividend income is taxed at a lower rate than regular income, but it's still too much.Let's say a Corp has a profit of $1,000,000. A chunk goes to the Feds, the Province and Municipality.
Call it 25% for the sake of example.
Say the Corp has 1000 shares and each share gets a dividend of $750.
That $750 in Joe Blow's hands now gets taxed again at the personal income tax rate so in reality almost half that Corporation's income went to Govt.
Why is proportion of income the standard for fairness? Why not number of children or age?
CTB silly.
In business it equates to about 12% kicked to the municipality by Feds and Province and commercial property taxes.
Need a link dink?
A tax on age? That might actually work. People are always saying it'll take years to pay off the debt. Why not tax years?
A progressive tax that keeps everyone the same age, but what's the optimal age?
A tax on age? That might actually work. People are always saying it'll take years to pay off the debt. Why not tax years?
A progressive tax that keeps everyone the same age, but what's the optimal age?
CTB silly.
In business it equates to about 12% kicked to the municipality by Feds and Province and commercial property taxes.
Need a link dink?
Never got any despite having three kids silly