Flynn and Son to be charged for Russian Collusion

Twila

Nanah Potato
Mar 26, 2003
14,698
73
48
wonder how fast the replublicans will turn on him now? Or are they're waiting for something...?
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
I would say the GOP would do anything Trump told them to do in order to get him to sign that tax bill - because nobody gets paid until everyone gets paid.

Trump actually has shot rock.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
FRANKFURT, Germany — The special counsel Robert Mueller has asked Deutsche Bank to share data on accounts held by President Donald Trump and his family, a person close to the matter said on Tuesday.

Germany's largest bank received a subpoena from Mueller several weeks ago to provide information on certain money and credit transactions, the person added, confirming a report by the German daily Handelsblatt published on Tuesday.

Deutsche Bank, which has loaned the Trump Organization millions of dollars for real-estate ventures, said it would not comment on any of its clients.

Deutsche Bank rejected demands in June by House Democrats to provide details of Trump's finances, citing privacy laws.
Mueller subpoenaed Deutsche Bank for info on Trump finances: Reuters - Business Insider

So...how many laws are you going to break framing Trump for your nazicommunieglobalist coup?
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
USA Today: If Michael Flynn's 'Crime' Is All Robert Mueller Has... It's Time To Move On

Transitions include the president-elect talking to foreign officials. That's not treason; that's the job description.

On Friday, President Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators about a perfectly legal conversation he had during the presidential transition with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

Flynn should not have lied, and why he chose to remains a mystery, but the substance of the single-count indictment against Flynn shows that special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation has strayed far from its original purpose.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...ns-crime-all-robert-mueller-has-its-time-move


TRUMP haters full of crap again
;)
it's a nice color, it looks good with the drool.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
How puppets get paid?
Who is Melissa Hodgman?
Peter Strzok's wife"
"Staff attorney at the SEC
"Securities and Exchange Commission
https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2016-217.html
His wife received a promotion at the SEC
Title?
Assistant Director in SEC's Enforcement Division
Date of promotion?
Friday, October 14, 2016
https://www.sec.gov/news/pressrelease/2016-217.html
Date Peter/Comey cleared Weiner emails?
Sun November 6, 2016
FBI clears Clinton -- again - CNNPolitics
Do you believe in coincidences?
#2 in FBI?
Andrew McCabe
FBI Director Wray Demotes Embattled Andrew McCabe, Internal Investigation Dubbed Train Wreck
https://truepundit.com/exclusive-fb...be-internal-investigation-dubbed-train-wreck/
Wife connection?
Grassley suggests deputy FBI director may have violated Hatch Act | TheHill
Trump Says Acting FBI Director
What is a pattern?
Follow the wives.
(by ESSAMCH007 )

[youtube]aqz00xzWpoU[/youtube]


crooked as F**K
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Latest revelations make the entire ‘collusion’ probe look like a partisan hit

So Peter Strzok wasn’t just a top investigator for Special Counsel Robert Mueller until he was axed for anti-Trump and pro-Clinton bias: He was also a major player in the Hillary e-mail probe and the FBI work that led to the “collusion” investigation.

SEE ALSO
FBI agent kicked off Mueller probe changed language in Comey's Clinton memo
FBI agent kicked off Mueller probe changed language in Comey's Clinton memo
And Mueller and the FBI both dragged their feet on sharing key info about all this with Congress.
Including the news that Strzok was the one who changed then-FBI chief Jim Comey’s draft language on Clinton’s use of that private server from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless” in the final version.

That’s huge, because the statute specifies that gross negligence in the handling of classified info is itself a crime, whatever the intent — though Comey declared that Clinton shouldn’t face prosecution precisely because she had no “intent” to break the law.

Strzok also conducted the FBI interviews of Clinton and her top aides, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, in the e-mail probe.

More, he was reportedly one of the major FBI figures urging investigations on the basis of the “Steele dossier” of Russian-sourced scurrilous anti-Trump allegations, which we now know was commissioned by the Clinton campaign.

More, he signed the documents that opened the ensuing “collusion” probe. And he led the FBI interview of Gen. Mike Flynn, in which Flynn told the lies that eventually forced him out as Trump’s national security adviser, and for which he’s now pleaded guilty in a deal with Mueller.

Meanwhile, Mills and Abedin’s testimony in their interviews has been shown false in one major regard: Contrary to their denials, each had been well aware of Clinton’s private server — they had to deal with the office fallout whenever it went down. Unlike Flynn, though, they never faced charges for lying to federal investigators.

Which makes President Trump’s request to Comey to go easy on Flynn look reasonable enough.

The public doesn’t know just how egregious Strzok’s bias was, and won’t until the release of his texts with his mistress, an FBI lawyer who (sigh) was also on Mueller’s team.

But as things stand, it now looks like the fix was well and truly in on the Hillary probe. Far worse, it also looks like the “collusion” probe was a partisan hit from the start — which undermines the basis for Mueller’s own investigation.

What a mess.

FILED UNDER 2016 ELECTION AFTERMATH , DONALD TRUMP , EDITORIAL , FBI ,
https://nypost.com/2017/12/05/lates...ire-collusion-probe-look-like-a-partisan-hit/


democrats have demo'd themselves
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
[youtube]KL9nLRDe0_A[/youtube]

Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), held that the prosecution's failure to inform the jury that a witness had been promised not to be prosecuted in exchange for his testimony was a failure to fulfill the duty to present all material evidence to the jury, and constituted a violation of due process, requiring a new trial.

This is the case even if the failure to disclose was a matter of negligence and not intent. The case extended the Court's holding in Brady v. Maryland, requiring such agreements to be disclosed to defense counsel.

As a result of this case, the term Giglio material is sometimes used to refer to any information pertaining to deals that witnesses in a criminal case may have entered into with the government. Or, I submit, Strzok's dismissal.

From a prosecutor...
The investigation is SCREWED


Hiya Weinstein!