Mississippi restaurant sued for religious discrimination after Christian waitress is

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
39,116
3,607
113
Mississippi restaurant sued for religious discrimination after Christian waitress is allegedly fired for wearing skirt, not jeans, to work
Justin Wm. Moyer, Washington Post
First posted: Thursday, September 28, 2017 11:27 AM EDT | Updated: Thursday, September 28, 2017 11:43 AM EDT
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is suing a Mississippi restaurant after a Christian waitress allegedly was fired for refusing to wear pants because of her faith.
In 2015, Kaetoya Watkins applied to be a server at a Georgia Blue restaurant in Flowood, Miss., a suburb of Jackson, according to a lawsuit filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. She was offered the position and scheduled to begin work before learning that Georgia Blue had a dress code requiring employees to wear blue jeans, the lawsuit said.
Watkins, who identifies as an Apostolic Pentecostal Christian, told a manager that her religion "prevented her from wearing pants," and asked to wear a blue jean skirt instead, the suit said. After receiving no reply to her request, Watkins reported for work wearing a jean skirt and was sent home, according to the suit; the next day, she received a voicemail from her manager that said Georgia Blue's owner had decided she "would not stray away from" its dress code policy. She never returned to work.
"Georgia Blue, LLC discriminated against Kaetoya Watkins by failing to reasonably accommodate her religious beliefs and practices, and denying her employment by rescinding its job offer or terminating her because of her religion," the suit said.
Georgia Blue has four locations and a bakery in Mississippi, and sells its own vodka, salad dressings and other products. In a statement, the company said it was "disappointed to learn of the lawsuit."
"Georgia Blue is an equal opportunity employer and does not discriminate on any basis, including religious practices," the statement said.
Employers must provide reasonable religious accommodation under the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the EEOC said, and it is seeking lost wages for Watkins and an injunction to prevent further discrimination.
"Under federal law, employers have a duty to provide an accommodation to allow an employee to practice his or her religion when the employer can do so without undue hardship on the operation of the company," Delner Franklin-Thomas, district director of the EEOC's Birmingham District Office, whose jurisdiction includes Mississippi, said in a statement. "This case shows the EEOC is committed to combatting [sic] religious discrimination in the workplace."
Apostolic Pentecostal Christians are known for wearing long skirts and eschewing make-up. Vinson Synan, a scholar-in-residence at Oral Roberts University and an expert on Pentecostalism, called the faith "the most conservative" in the Pentecostal family.
"It's expressive worship compared to the more sedate worship of mainline Protestant churches," he said.
Mississippi restaurant sued for religious discrimination after Christian waitres
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
I wonder how many of these lawsuits are all about we will show you that our religious rights are more important than your dress code/brand?
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
A person should have the right to wear modest clothing. The problem of course, is who defines 'modest.'
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Should football players 'take a knee' to protest, and demand the right to not wear football uniforms?

They are more than welcome at this point to remove their helmets and pads but the rules of the game stay the same...full contact. Have at er boys!
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
A person should have the right to wear modest clothing. The problem of course, is who defines 'modest.'

Doesn't the business have a right to put a dress code in place if they are looking for a look/brand as long as it is within reason, to wear jeans I don't think is an inappropriate request. I don't agree with the article in the OP's post, I think there is more to this story than what is being written
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
Doesn't the business have a right to put a dress code in place if they are looking for a look/brand as long as it is within reason, to wear jeans I don't think is an inappropriate request. I don't agree with the article in the OP's post, I think there is more to this story than what is being written

Unfortunately the personal rights granted in the civil rights act take precedent over the businesses right to enforce a dress code. Now if the manager had stated the dress code prior to offering the job and she refused he just doesn't make the offer. His problem was offering the position without disclosing all the requirements ahead of time.

Personally I think the compromise of a denim skirt should have been acceptable but it isn't my business.
 

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Doesn't the business have a right to put a dress code in place if they are looking for a look/brand as long as it is within reason, to wear jeans I don't think is an inappropriate request. I don't agree with the article in the OP's post, I think there is more to this story than what is being written

Like I said, codifying what is or isn't 'modest' is difficult since who defines it?
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Like I said, codifying what is or isn't 'modest' is difficult since who defines it?

Oh I didn't say anything about modest I said acceptable, and it doesn't have to be by all. Just has to be acceptable to employer, employee, and the customer they are catering to, if it is viewed unacceptable by someone they don't have to go there. It doesn't have to be a point of contention to prove a point, if it isn't for you then keep on walking nothing to see here :)
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
What about the RCMP Stetson, that was for years, like the rest of the uniform, one of the recognized trademarks of the RCMP?
It took only one Sikh to change a tradition, that began in 1920....
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
What about the RCMP Stetson, that was for years, like the rest of the uniform, one of the recognized trademarks of the RCMP?
It took only one Sikh to change a tradition, that began in 1920....

Although I don't like that decision with RCMP and the Legion, I can see because it is a public entity vs. Private enterprise
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Although I don't like that decision with RCMP and the Legion, I can see because it is a public entity vs. Private enterprise
I agree (kind of) but that was the beginning of a slippery slope ending... (maybe not?) with the CHRC....

Then you get people like Mentalfloss who want to push it to I wouldn't even imagine....what limit......
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I wonder how many of these lawsuits are all about we will show you that our religious rights are more important than your dress code/brand?
The only dress code given to Christian women was about how they should hide their long hair. I'm going to guess it stopped up-skirt fondling by the lower IQ people that ate there.