Refugee/Migrant Crisis

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
EU Vice President Admits To White Genocide Plan
EU Vice President Admits To White Genocide Plan – InvestmentWatch

Well look what the real naziglobalcommunists are really up to.

Alex Jones breaks down a EU bureaucrat clip of European Union VP saying we'll Islamify you. Muslims are allowed to rape because it is their culture and how you must accept that culture if we want to survive in diversified europe.

[youtube]80eJwvShspA[/youtube]
VIDEO for you non reading the citation types
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,781
3,548
113
Trump expected to end 'Dreamers' program: Sources
Jill Colvin and Catherine Lucey, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Sunday, September 03, 2017 11:40 PM EDT | Updated: Monday, September 04, 2017 11:12 AM EDT
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is expected to announce that he will end protections for young immigrants who were brought into the country illegally as children, but with a six-month delay, people familiar with the plans said.
The delay in the formal dismantling of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA program, would be intended to give Congress time to decide whether it wants to address the status of the so-called Dreamers legislation, according to two people familiar with the president’s thinking. But it was not immediately clear how the six-month delay would work in practice and what would happen to people who currently have work permits under the program, or whose permits expire during the six-month stretch.
It also was unclear exactly what would happen if Congress failed to pass a measure by the considered deadline, they said. The two spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter ahead of a planned Tuesday announcement.
The president, who has been grappling with the issue for months, has been known to change his mind in the past and could still shift course. The plan was first reported by Politico Sunday evening.
Trump has been wrestling for months with what to do with the Obama-era DACA program, which has given nearly 800,000 young immigrants a reprieve from deportation and the ability to work legally in the form of two-year, renewable work permits.
The expected move would come as the White House faces a Tuesday deadline set by Republican state officials threatening to sue the Trump administration if the president did not end the program. It also would come as Trump digs in on appeals to his base as he finds himself increasingly under fire, with his poll numbers at near-record lows.
Trump had been personally torn as late as last week over how to deal with what are undoubtedly the most sympathetic immigrants living in the U.S. illegally. Many came to the U.S. as young children and have no memories of the countries they were born in.
During his campaign, Trump slammed DACA as illegal “amnesty” and vowed to eliminate the program the day he took office. But since his election, Trump has wavered on the issue, at one point telling The Associated Press that those covered could “rest easy.”
Trump had been unusually candid as he wrestled with the decision in the early months of his administration. During a February press conference, he said the topic was “a very, very difficult subject for me, I will tell you. To me, it’s one of the most difficult subjects I have.”
“You have some absolutely incredible kids — I would say mostly,” he said, adding: “I love these kids.”
All the while, his administration continued to process applications and renew DACA work permits, to the dismay of immigration hard-liners.
News of the president’s expected decision drew strong reactions from advocates on both sides of the issue.
“IF REPORTS ARE TRUE, Pres Trump better prepare for the civil rights fight of his admin. A clean DREAM Act is now a Nat Emergency #DefendDACA,” tweeted New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez, a Democrat.
Republican Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen of Florida, tweeted: “After teasing #Dreamers for months with talk of his ”great heart,“ @POTUS slams door on them. Some ‘heart’...”
But Rep. Steve King, an Iowa Republican who has called DACA unconstitutional, warned that a delay in dismantling it would amount to “Republican suicide.”
“Ending DACA now gives chance 2 restore Rule of Law. Delaying so R Leadership can push Amnesty is Republican suicide,” he wrote.
It would be up to members of Congress to pass a measure to protect those who have been covered under the program. While there is considerable support for that among Democrats and moderate Republicans, Congress is already facing a packed fall agenda and has had a poor track record in recent years for passing immigration-related bills.
House Speaker Paul Ryan and a number of other legislators urged Trump last week to hold off on scrapping DACA to give them time to come up with a legislative fix.
“These are kids who know no other country, who are brought here by their parents and don’t know another home. And so I really do believe that there needs to be a legislative solution,” Ryan told Wisconsin radio station WCLO.
The Obama administration created the DACA program in 2012 as a stopgap to protect some young immigrants from deportation as they pushed unsuccessfully for a broader immigration overhaul in Congress.
The program protected people in the country illegally who could prove they arrived before they were 16, had been in the United States for several years and had not committed a crime while being here. It mimicked versions of the so-called DREAM Act, which would have provided legal status for young immigrants but was never passed by Congress.
As of July 31, 2015, more than 790,000 young immigrants had been approved under the program, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The House under Democratic control passed a Dream Act in 2010 but it died in the Senate. Since Republicans retook control of the House in late 2010, it has taken an increasingly hard line on immigration. House Republicans refused to act on the Senate’s comprehensive immigration bill in 2013. Two years later, a GOP border security bill languished because of objections from conservatives.
Many House Republicans represent highly conservative districts. The primary upset of the former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor to a conservative challenger in 2014 in a campaign that cast him as soft on illegal immigration convinced many House Republicans that pro-immigrant stances could cost them politically.
So despite Ryan’s personal commitment on the issue and his comments in favour of the young immigrants, action to protect them may be unlikely in the House — absent intense lobbying from Trump.
———
Associated Press writers Ken Thomas and Erica Werner contributed to this report.
Trump expected to end 'Dreamers' program: Sources | World | News | Toronto Sun
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,781
3,548
113
106-year-old 'severely disabled' Afghan woman faces deportation from Sweden
David Keyton, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Monday, September 04, 2017 01:55 PM EDT | Updated: Monday, September 04, 2017 02:03 PM EDT
HOVA, Sweden — A 106-year-old Afghan woman who made a perilous journey to Europe, carried by her son and grandson through mountains, deserts and forests, is facing deportation from Sweden after her asylum application was rejected.
Bibihal Uzbeki is severely disabled and can barely speak. Her family has appealed the rejection.
Their journey made headlines in 2015, when they were part of a huge influx of people who came to Europe from Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq and other countries. They travelled by foot and on trains through the Balkans before finally reaching Sweden.
Two years later, she and her 11 family members are living in the small village of Hova, in central Sweden.
Her rejection letter came during Ramadan. While the family avoided telling her, the constant grief from her granddaughters made her suspicious.
“My sisters were crying,” explained 22-year-old Mohammed Uzbeki. “My grandmother asked, ‘Why are you crying?”’ The family says that soon after she understood her request was denied, her health started deteriorating and she suffered a debilitating stroke.
The Swedish Migration Agency confirmed in a statement to the AP they had “taken a decision regarding an expulsion in the case,” adding “generally speaking, high age does not in itself provide grounds for asylum.”
People whose applications are rejected are allowed up to three appeals, a process that can take a long time. The applications of other family members are in various stages of appeal.
The family feels the plight of Afghans is being ignored by Swedish authorities. Many countries in Europe deny asylum to Afghans from parts of the country considered safe.
“The reasoning from the migration agency is that it’s not unsafe enough in Afghanistan,” said Sanna Vestin, the head of the Swedish Network of Refugee Support Groups. But she said many of the big cities cited as safe are not at the moment.
Before their journey to Sweden, the family had been living illegally in Iran for eight years. They left Afghanistan because of an ongoing war and insecurity, but Mohammed Uzbeki said it’s difficult to prove that the family faces a specific enemy if they return.
“If I knew who was the enemy, I would have just avoided them,” he said, citing the Islamic State group, the Taliban and suicide bombers as possible dangers.
In the Uzbeki home, Bibihal’s daughter-in-law gently readjusts the elderly woman’s veil as Mohammed Uzbeki watches over her.
“She still cannot speak properly, she has hallucinations,” he laments. “She says they are coming to kill us, we should run away.”
106-year old Afghan refugee Bibihal Uzbeki lies in bed in Hova, Sweden, Sunday, Sept. 3, 2017, and despite being severely disabled and barely able to speak, she is facing deportation from Sweden after her asylum application was rejected. Bibihal Uzbeki made a perilous journey to Europe, carried by her son and grandson through mountains, deserts and forests, but has suffered a debilitating stroke and now faces deportation. (AP Photo/David Keyton)

106-year-old 'severely disabled' Afghan woman faces deportation from Sweden | Wo
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
israel should take some of these refugees
they could put them in the illegal settlements they are building on muslim land in the first place
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,781
3,548
113
Trump ending DACA program protecting young immigrants
Jill Colvin, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 08:05 AM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 09:07 PM EDT
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Tuesday began dismantling Barack Obama’s program protecting hundreds of thousands of young immigrants who were brought into the country illegally as children, declaring he loves the “dreamers” who could face deportation but insisting it’s up to Congress, not him, to address their plight.
Trump didn’t specify what he wanted done, essentially sending a six-month time bomb to his fellow Republicans in Congress who have no consensus on how to defuse it.
On Twitter Tuesday night, he wrote: “Congress now has 6 months to legalize DACA (something the Obama Administration was unable to do). If they can’t, I will revisit this issue!”
The president tried to have it both ways with his compromise plan: fulfilling his campaign promise to eliminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, while at the same time showing compassion for those who would lose deportation protection and the ability to work legally in the U.S. New applications will be rejected and the program will be formally rescinded, but the administration will continue to renew existing two-year work permits for the next six months, giving Congress time to act.
“I have a love for these people and hopefully now Congress will be able to help them and do it properly,” Trump told reporters.
Yet at the same time, the White House distributed talking points to members of Congress that included a dark warning: “The Department of Homeland Security urges DACA recipients to use the time remaining on their work authorizations to prepare for and arrange their departure from the United States.”
Although Trump’s announcement had been anticipated in recent days, it still left young people covered by the DACA program reeling.
“You just feel like you are empty,” said a sobbing Paola Martinez, 23, who came to the U.S. from Colombia and recently graduated with a civil engineering degree from Florida International University
“I honestly can’t even process it right now,” said Karen Marin, an immigrant from Mexico, who was in a physics class at Bronx Community College when the news broke. “I’m still trying to get myself together.”
Their predicament now shifts to Congress, which has repeatedly tried — and failed — to pass immigration legislation.
White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the president would look to Congress to pass a “responsible immigration reform package” with money to control the border with Mexico and better protect American workers’ jobs — along with protecting “dreamers.”
Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, the No. 2 Senate Republican, said if Trump truly wants a comprehensive immigration reform package, including a solution for the 11 million immigrants in the country illegally, he’s certain to be disappointed. Congress tried that and failed in 2013, and GOP leaders immediately ruled it out Tuesday.
“Guaranteed failure,” Cornyn said.
If the goal is a more incremental package that combines a solution for the “dreamers” with steps such as visa reforms and enhanced border security, “there may be a deal to be had,” Cornyn said.
Sanders’ blunt warning to lawmakers skeptical they can come up with a plan: “If they can’t, then they should get out of the way and let somebody else take their job that can actually get something done.”
The DACA program was created by former President Obama by executive action in 2012, when it became clear Congress would not act to address the young immigrants’ plight in legislation that was dubbed the “Dream Act.” Trump ran his campaign as an immigration-hard liner, labeling DACA as illegal “amnesty” and pledging to repeal it immediately. But he shifted his approach after the election, expressing sympathy for the “dreamers,” many of whom were brought to the U.S. by their parents when they were very young and have no memories of the counties where they were born.
Trump’s aides painted his move to gradually phase out the program as the best of bad options: State officials had threatened a lawsuit if he did not act by Tuesday to repeal the program, which has given nearly 800,000 young immigrants a reprieve from deportation and the ability to work legally in the U.S. in the form of two-year, renewable work permits.
“In effect, I am not going to just cut DACA off, but rather provide a window of opportunity for Congress to finally act,” Trump said. He said he was not in favour of punishing children for the actions of their parents, but he added, “Young Americans have dreams, too.”
Lawmakers were trickling back to the Capitol Tuesday from a summer recess and already are confronting a daunting to-do list including a relief package for Hurricane Harvey victims and a pressing need to raise the federal borrowing limit. Some GOP lawmakers and aides are discussing the possibility of a bipartisan immigration package, including a solution for the dreamers, money for border security and enforcement, and perhaps other items like changes to some visa programs.
A stand-alone bill addressing just the “dreamers” seems unlikely to pass the House, given the firm stance of many conservatives. And it’s unclear whether Trump would sign it anyway.
House Speaker Paul Ryan said he hoped the “House and Senate, with the president’s leadership, will be able to find consensus on a permanent legislative solution that includes ensuring that those who have done nothing wrong can still contribute as a valued part of this great country.”
Under the phase-out plan announced by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the Department of Homeland Security was halting acceptance of new applications under DACA as of Tuesday. People with permits set to expire between now and March 5, 2018, will be able to re-apply as long as their applications are submitted by Oct. 5. Existing permits will remain in effect, and applications already in the pipeline will be processed.
That means the earliest that dreamers would begin to lose protections under the program would be next March.
Trump’s action nonetheless drew swift criticism from immigration advocates, Democratic lawmakers and business and religious leaders who had urged Trump to spare the program.
Obama slammed the decision as “wrong,” ”self-defeating“ and ”cruel.“
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi called it “a deeply shameful act of political cowardice and a despicable assault on innocent young people in communities across America.”
Some Republicans objected, too.
Sen. John McCain of Arizona said Trump was taking “the wrong approach,” and he added: “The federal government has a responsibility to defend and secure our borders, but we must do so in a way that upholds all that is decent and exceptional about our nation.”
One bill addressing the issue that has received significant attention, introduced by Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Dick Durbin, D-Ill., would allow young immigrants who grew up in the U.S. to earn lawful permanent residence and eventually American citizenship if they complete a list of requirements.
The president, Graham declared, must “work the phones ... try and get a consensus here.”
“From a Republican Party point of view, this is a defining moment,” he said.
Trump’s announcement came the same day as a deadline set by Republican state officials who said they would challenge DACA in court unless the administration rescinded it. Administration officials argued the program was on flimsy legal footing — and said that allowing the lawsuit to proceed would have thrown it into far more chaos than phasing it out. After Trump’s announcement, attorneys general in New York and California said they were prepared to seek legal action against his decision.
———
Associated Press writers Sadie Gurman, Ken Thomas, Erica Werner and Richard Lardner in Washington, Adriana Gomez Licon in Miami and Astrid Galvan in New York contributed to this report
Trump ending DACA program protecting young immigrants | World | News | Toronto S
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,781
3,548
113
Cher shuts down Twitter troll: 'Then keep your eyes open b----'
WENN.COM
First posted: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 08:56 AM EDT | Updated: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 09:05 AM EDT
Cher has clapped back at a fan who challenged her to take in a youngster potentially affected by U.S. President Trump’s decision to end an immigrant program.
On Tuesday, it was announced that President Trump would end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which gave immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as a child the temporary right to live, study and work legally in the U.S.
In response to the news, the Believe singer took to Twitter to tell her followers that she was ready to take in and protect a “dreamer”, a nickname for affected immigrants, and urged members of the showbiz industry to do the same.
She wrote, “Those Who Can Must Take a DREAMER In2 Their Home & Protect Them!! I’m Ready 2 Do This & (praying) Others in MY BUSINESS WILL DO THE SAME!! SANCTUARY (sic).”
One user responded by expressing her skepticism that Cher will actually follow through on her declaration.
She wrote, “Sure you will Cher... I’ll believe it when I see it,” and then Cher hit back by replying, “Then keep your eyes open b----.”
Cher continued to rant about the DACA decision, writing, “(America) HAS BEEN OUR DREAMERS ONLY HOME!! HOW CAN WE THROW THEM INTO THE WILDERNESS. TRUMP IS (A) COMPLETE COWARD... WHY DIDNT HE END DACA ‘HIMSELF’ ON (TV) (sic).”
Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the news at a press conference rather than Trump.
Another user responded to her declaration by asking her to let everyone know how her plan works out.
“U Ppl Kill Me IS THAT ALL U GOT!!” Cher replied. “My Guest House Has Been FULL With Down On Luck Frnds (friends) Since I Built It. Frnd (Friend) of Mom Lives There Now (sic),” she continued, explaining through emojis that her house caught on fire.
Cher shuts down Twitter troll: 'Then keep your eyes open b----' | Celebrities |
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,781
3,548
113
Two 11-year-olds part of vicious attack on woman, cops say
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Thursday, September 07, 2017 11:02 AM EDT | Updated: Thursday, September 07, 2017 11:06 AM EDT
ST. LOUIS — A 27-year-old woman is recovering after being attacked by several people in St. Louis, and police say two 11-year-olds are among the suspects.
KMOV-TV reports that the attack happened Monday in the Tower Grove South neighbourhood. Two men and two women were attacked by seven people, in an incident sparked by a previous argument between two of the people involved.
Three of the victims did not require treatment, but one woman was unresponsive when police arrived. She is recovering in a hospital.
Neighbours say the victims are refugees, but they didn’t say where they are originally from. The International Institute of St. Louis is assisting the families.
Police say four of the seven suspects are under the age of 18.
Two 11-year-olds part of vicious attack on woman, cops say | World | News | Toro
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,781
3,548
113
PM needs to step up for Afghan interpreter
By Joe Warmington, Toronto Sun
First posted: Saturday, September 09, 2017 07:11 PM EDT | Updated: Saturday, September 09, 2017 07:27 PM EDT
The good news is we have learned Prime Minister Justin Trudeau now knows our struggling-to-survive Afghan interpreters exist.
The bad news is he says he won’t personally “intervene.”
This news comes from letters I’ve obtained, exchanged this summer, between New York-based Red T President Maya Hess and the office of Prime Minister Trudeau.
Dr. Hess, who was instrumental in gaining interpreter James Akam’s entry into Canada from a refugee camp in Germany, explained how Red T is a “non-profit organization for the protection of linguists at risk worldwide” and is “speaking to you on behalf of Alam Khan Tutakhail,” who worked with the Canadian military in Kandahar between 2007-10 and for several dozens like him who missed out on a special program to be able to come to Canada.
“He is now in desperate need of asylum in Canada,” she pleaded to our PM.
The Taliban and ISIS have been chasing around the interpreters left behind in Afghanistan and threatening to kill them and their families. My feeling has been the very least we can do for these men — and their families, which are also at risk — is to assist them with the application process to get into Canada through regular immigration means.
But so far, with the exception of James Akam, who then-immigration minister John McCallum went to great lengths to assist, there has been silence from the governing Liberals.
“How can someone with no means, no connections, whatsoever, navigate this bureaucracy?” Hess wrote. “We hope, your Honour, that you will not turn your back on Alam but instead facilitate his entry into Canada. Helping him will not only be a beacon for the other ISAF countries but reflect Canada’s fundamental humanity.”
Writing back on behalf of Trudeau “chief correspondence officer” T. Jolicoeur said “on behalf of the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, I would like to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence.”
The letter continued, “I recognize why you have written to the prime minister and asked for assistance. While I sympathize with the situation you describe I hope you will understand that the prime minister is unable to personally intervene in this matter.”
Interesting, because Trudeau has gone to bat for Haitians in limbo in the United States by welcoming them at the Canadian border. He’s also tweeted about Canada being open and welcoming, as well as expressing concern for refugees around the world from Africa, Syria and Myanmar.
We have not been able to get him interested in the special plight of these interpreters, who have already pledged allegiance to Canada and who served our country with our troops in harm’s way.
The letter explained this would “fall under the purview of the Honourable Ahmed Hussen, Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship” who Hess had already CC’d in his original letter.
Jolicoeur did explain “while the prime minister appreciates being made aware of your concerns, he will leave the matter to be considered by Minister Hussen.”
Red T has not yet heard from Hussen, himself, once a refugee. Hopefully, we can get the immigration minister interested in this file and perhaps Trudeau’s letter will help in that regard. It would help if the interpreters could at least meet a consular person in whatever country they are in to get properly registered. They have earned it.
“I am in deep water,” says Khan, living outside in Turkey. “Can you talk with PM to let the immigration minister know to find a solution?”
That’s what this column is for.
So far there has been no movement except for Trudeau thanking Red T for bringing it to his attention and deferring it to his appropriate minister. But perhaps that’s the beginning of something. We can hope.
From all indications under Trudeau, Canada is targeting bringing in more than a million immigrants inside of the Liberal government-elected mandate. Why not a few Afghans who have already been vetted by Canada and already served our country with honour?
Seems only fair.
jwarmington@postmedia.com
Alam Khan was born in Afghanistan and chose to work with the Canadians as an interpreter. He said the Canadian government hasn't responded with help, despite him working alongside Canadians in Afghanistan, instead paying out Omar Khadr. (SUPPLIED)

PM needs to step up for Afghan interpreter | WARMINGTON | Ontario | News | Toron
 

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,781
3,548
113
Teen awaiting deportation from U.S. accused in killing
Paul Elias, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
First posted: Friday, September 15, 2017 03:16 PM EDT | Updated: Friday, September 15, 2017 03:39 PM EDT
SAN FRANCISCO — Federal immigration agents were tracking a teenager who was facing deportation when he fatally shot a popular community volunteer during a robbery in San Francisco, authorities said Friday.
The slaying occurred on Aug. 15, four days after sheriff’s investigators say 18-year-old Erick Garcia-Pineda stole the murder weapon from the personal car of a San Francisco police officer.
Four days after the killing, Garcia-Pineda’s monitoring device was removed from his ankle, triggering an unsuccessful search for him. An immigration judge ordered him to wear the bracelet as a condition of his release from federal custody in April.
The case has stirred memories of the 2015 killing of a young woman on a San Francisco pier by a Mexican national who had been deported five times. A gun stolen from a law enforcement officer was also used in that shooting.
The shooting also ignited a national debate on sanctuary city policies that bar local police from co-operating with federal immigration authorities unless they are seeking suspects convicted or charged with violent crimes.
Authorities say Garcia-Pineda had been detained by immigration authorities in December and released from custody in April pending deportation. In addition to wearing the ankle monitor, the judge required him to routinely check in with immigration officials.
He failed to show up for his August appointment, said James Schwab, a spokesman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
ICE said a contractor received a tamper alert on Aug. 19 but authorities couldn’t find him. ICE told the man’s attorney that his client should report to them immediately.
The sheriff’s department says Garcia-Pineda was wearing the ankle bracelet when he was arrested on Sept. 3 on misdemeanour battery charges and deputies removed it. ICE says the Sheriff’s Department ignored a request to block his release from jail that day.
Investigators later connected Garcia-Pineda to the killing of 23-year-old Abel Esquivel during a robbery.
ICE agents also asked the local sheriff in May to detain a second man arrested locally who is also charged with Esquivel’s murder, Jesus Perez-Araujo, 24.
San Francisco police arrested Perez-Araujo for possession of marijuana and illegal possession of brass knuckles. He was ultimately only charged with misdemeanour possession of brass knuckles, court records showed.
Esquivel volunteered at the Central American Resource Center, which provides legal help to low-income Latino clients and other social services.
“We were shocked to hear the weapon belonged to a police officer,” said Lariza Dugan Cuadra, executive director of the centre.
Martin Halloran, president of the police officers’ union, said the officer did not know his vehicle had been broken into until after the shooting.
“There were no visible signs of the burglary,” Halloran said. “The officer, a highly decorated veteran, is devastated.”
In the 2015 killing, Kate Steinle was shot as she walked on a pier crowded with tourists.
The San Francisco sheriff had released Jose Inez Garcia Zarate from jail several weeks before the Steinle shooting despite a detainer request from ICE.
Zarate acknowledges shooting the gun but said it fired accidentally. He has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder.
Jury selection for his trial begins Oct. 2 while the debate over sanctuary cities continues.
The Trump administration opposes the policy and has threatened to withhold federal funds to those cities, prompting lawsuits. A federal judge on Friday barred the administration from withholding funding until a lawsuit in Chicago is resolved.
California’s “sanctuary state” bill that would limit police co-operation with federal immigration authorities cleared a major hurdle Friday when it was approved by the state Assembly.
The Senate was scheduled to give final approval to the legislation before lawmakers wrap up the legislative year late Friday or early Saturday.
San Francisco police say Garcia-Pineda and two other young men began driving around the city looking for robbery victims after they stole the gun on Aug. 11.
A police bulletin from 2015 said officers should keep a gun with them when they are in public and that if they are forced to leave a firearm briefly in an unattended vehicle, they must secure the weapon in the locked trunk where it cannot be seen.
Associated Press writer Elliot Spagat in San Diego contributed to this report.
Teen awaiting deportation from U.S. accused in killing | World | News | Toronto
 

ZulFiqar786

Electoral Member
Sep 12, 2017
233
0
16
Brampton ON
If the Haitians were White people this wouldn’t be an issue. The truth is this isn’t an issue about refugees, but closet racists who simply don’t like black people and don’t want them here. Otherwise the Haitians are genuine refugees and there is no reason to deny them asylum.
 

Durry

House Member
May 18, 2010
4,709
286
83
Canada
Nothing preventing the Haitians from going other non white countries.

Maybe they should grow up and learn to solve their own problems.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
If the Haitians were White people this wouldn’t be an issue. The truth is this isn’t an issue about refugees, but closet racists who simply don’t like black people and don’t want them here. Otherwise the Haitians are genuine refugees and there is no reason to deny them asylum.


The Haitians aren't the only legit refugees on the planet, perhaps when you get your head around the reality that the world is a really big place, you might not chalk everything up to racism
 

ZulFiqar786

Electoral Member
Sep 12, 2017
233
0
16
Brampton ON
The Haitians aren't the only legit refugees on the planet, perhaps when you get your head around the reality that the world is a really big place, you might not chalk everything up to racism
[/COLOR]
[/FONT]







You admit they are legit refugees though. Hence Canada cannot turn them away. Haiti is in our hemisphere, if countries like Germany are accepting hundreds of thousands of refugees from the Middle East, the least Canada could do is accept legit refugees from the Western hemisphere. The only reason people don’t want to accept them is because of anti-black racism. There is no other conceivable reason. Haitians speak French and Quebec needs more people desperately. Accepting these French-speaking Haitians who end up settling in Quebec benefits Canada in every way. The truth is we need Haitians more than they need us.



 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister

You admit they are legit refugees though.


So what?


Hence Canada cannot turn them away.


Sure we can, Trudeau is already doing it.

... See how easy it is?


Haiti is in our hemisphere, if countries like Germany are accepting hundreds of thousands of refugees from the Middle East, the least Canada could do is accept legit refugees from the Western hemisphere.


There's a lot of countries in our hemisphere, 1/2 the planet to be specific, not just Haiti


The only reason people don’t want to accept them is because of anti-black racism.


Correction, no one wants them because Canada doesn't need to be providing never-ending handouts to yet another group that believes that anytime they don't get what they want, all they have to do is holler racism and magically everything is fine


There is no other conceivable reason.


Economically unsuitable is a great reason


Haitians speak French and Quebec needs more people desperately.


Parisians speak french too.




Accepting these French-speaking Haitians who end up settling in Quebec benefits Canada in every way.


Like how exactly?


The truth is we need Haitians more than they need us.



Are you fukking insane
 

Durry

House Member
May 18, 2010
4,709
286
83
Canada
Everybody wants to come to White Christian countries, nobody wants to go to Muslim countries, what does that tell you ??
 

ZulFiqar786

Electoral Member
Sep 12, 2017
233
0
16
Brampton ON
Everybody wants to come to White Christian countries, nobody wants to go to Muslim countries, what does that tell you ??





Canada isn’t a White or Christian country. Europe certainly is White, but Europe is declining fast. The future is in Asia-Pacific, especially Malaysia, which is a Muslim country. The future of immigration will be to Asia-Pacific. Even White people will want to move there since Europe is declining fast. Russia, Europe’s largest country, will be a disaster soon. They are not only paralyzed by sanctions, the value of Ruble is ridiculously low, they are in high debt, capital flight, population shrinking, widespread alcoholism, extremely high suicide rate, and a dictator (Putin) who is making things worse driving his country off a cliff. White people will no longer be top dog, it’s inevitable, it’s already happening.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
Are they refugees? Why should we prefer Parisians to Haitians, simply because Parisians are White? Once again your comments reflect your deeply ingrained racism and attitude of white supremacy.


And once again your comments reflect your racist attitude towards white folks.