I heard a supporter of Kaepernick on tv railing about all the things wrong with America. I think those fellows have a misguided understanding of what the National Anthem is about.
The situations with the police, poverty, political indiscretions, etc. are social and political issues. That is what elected Governors and Senators are for - to complain to. That would be the proper way to address one's concerns, not by protesting in such a dumb way as refusing to stand for the National Anthem.
Why do people stand for the National Anthem? It was my understanding that we stand because we identify ourselves as people of that nation and that we are loyal to our nation.
To refuse to identify one's nationality and loyalty to the nation of your citizenship is cowardly, ineffective and silly, imo.
Such a means of protesting will not change anything. It will only divide the country further into those who support the protest and those who do not.
If people want change why the hell don't they go through the proper channels? A caper like this just looks like a play for attention.
I think the whole thing would have been better ignored; not made into a major media issue for days and days. The guy has a right to do what he's doing, futile as it is and damaging to his career and reputation. It seems that there much more important issues to talk about and fight over than the National Anthem!
He's protesting for others, not for himself.....
You’d think conservatives would understand this, given how they’re always going on about the US Constitution and "personal liberty," but apparently they only mean that for white people.
Unnoticed in most of the media is the ultimate irony of all this: Levi's, the clothing company that bought naming rights for the 49ers' stadium, is way more unpatriotic than Kaepernick will ever be.
Even though it likes to portray itself as a salt-of-the-Earth, American company, Levis's, like most of corporate America, has taken advantage of the so-called free trade era to send most of its manufacturing jobs overseas.
Only one line of Levi's jeans, the 501 classics, is now made here in the US.
Meanwhile, the company's finance, customer relations and IT departments are now also all handled abroad, mostly in India.
The outsourcing of Levi's financial department alone cost 500 jobs.
And, according to Citizens for Tax Justice, Levi Strauss is sitting on more than $100 million overseas to avoid paying US income taxes on the money. Very patriotic!
In other words, while Kaepernick risks his career (and possibly his life) to take a stand for people who live and work here in the US, and Levi's exploits its reputation to participate in and contribute to the death of the middle class while enriching its executives and shareholders.
But you won't hear anything about that from Republicans.
They've been on Levi's side all along.
They've supported so-called free trade deal after so-called free trade deal, all while talking tough about God, country and the flag.
For conservatives, patriotism is just a slogan, and their crocodile tears about Kaepernick prove it.
Colin Kaepernick Isn't Unpatriotic, Levi's Is
So, the US is all about individual freedom of expression and free speech, unless you decide to exercise that freedom at a sporting event.
Whiny bunch of brain dead sheeple getting all whiny about somebody not standing up for a bad tune and a coloured rag. The puppet masters say ya gotta be outraged so y'all jump up and down yellin' crap the media told ya to say. Unfreaking believable. Y'all should take a handful of Valium.
Refusing to stand for the national anthem is misplaced protesting. One can still respect his national identity and at the same time protest against the governmental policies.
Take a look around the world. In some countries, you would be executed for not standing. FGS, a man was killed in N Korea for going to sleep during a speech!
So. . . you're saying it's wrong to exercise the freedom you've been given?Refusing to stand for the national anthem is misplaced protesting. One can still respect his national identity and at the same time protest against the governmental policies.
Take a look around the world. In some countries, you would be executed for not standing. FGS, a man was killed in N Korea for going to sleep during a speech!
The national anthem symbolized the United States of America. That is the country that gave the freedom to stand or to not stand for the national anthem. So why blame the country as a whole for its management policies?
There are more productive and efficient ways to protest governmental policies, like confronting your congressman, writing letters, even public protest marches and petitions. Refusing to stand for the national anthem only serves to divide the country further than it already is divided.
One has to wonder if the main point of this nonsensical 'protest' is to get the publicity? If the media would stop flogging it, it would probably die down and go away.