Yes and we've never heard any doom and gloom predictions before. I'll take your word for it I'm sure.The next US president will be in charge of the worst militarconomic catastrophy ever.
Bush is out of the race so is no longer the establishment candidate .
Your grand proclamations would hold more weight if you actually kept up .
He's a real estate developer in New York, hardly corporate America.
I respect your position for yourself, but one doesn't really know until a president is in office and
begins to lead the country, so if I were a u.s. citizen I would follow those democrats closely and
then cast my vote,
The next US president will be in charge of the worst militarconomic catastrophy ever.
Whoever president may be, he will be the same as others; it seems: the president does not change the policy neither he may do an act of his own.
There is a program and any president will follow that program planned beforehand. This is my impression, and God is the All-Knowing.
Which of course would be cast for a Democrat each and every time regardless.
I am a registered democrat and I would not consider any of the candidates. Nor would I consider any of the republican candidates. So to me, it doesn't matter. Some close to me say vote for the lesser of two evils. Naw,,I'm not going for more or less. If that makes me wrong then I'm wrong. My vote wouldn't amount to a hill of beans anyway.
I thought the same about Alberta. It shows anything is possible.We have the electoral process. If you live in a traditional conservative state , or liberal, chances of your vote meaning anything if it is contrary to that tradition is nil. I live in a conservative state, Case closed.
Whoever president may be, he will be the same as others; it seems: the president does not change the policy neither he may do an act of his own.
There is a program and any president will follow that program planned beforehand. This is my impression, and God is the All-Knowing.
yes, the republican party doesn't have anything in their plans that include anything I wish for.
that is the right of a democratic system, but there probably should be about 4 different parties, and not just two who just take the opposite of whatever the other side thinks, same in Canada.
nothing for the good of the people, just the 'other' side, but we are all stuck with that, have to
pick the one where we fit in, even if it is just a little bit, the only power we have is our vote.
but that could change over time, if enough democrats voted, unless of course you are in one of the
totally religious states, then you are hooped.
Hopefully Mad magazine's poster boy Alfred E. Newman. No doubt he is more articulate than the field of candidates I see.
So you would sell your soul and vote for the democrat whatever the circumstance or whoever the person .
Yup the same attitude that elect a serial tax evader like Charlie Rangle 40 years in a row .
Good for you .
It's pretty much how Conservatives and Republicans vote, too.That is pretty much how Liberals and Democrats vote.
Who will that be ? Hillary already belongs to Goldman Sachs so I would guess they are out .With Trump it's all about deals and will he sell America to the highest bidder?