If I understand your testimony, ND, "God" cannot or does not want to be known objectively, but only experienced subjectively as "my god".
That's the gist of it, but the use of "not want" still implies a level of consciousness on "God's" part which again is an attempt to apply some human characteristics to something we really know nothing about. I'm comfortable with "cannot be known objectively" as it keeps any assumptions as to the nature of God within the mystery that it is. We can see "God's work" around us every day, but just what "God" is remains a mystery.
But to each his/her own. I'm not one to stomp on other people's personal beliefs, especially spiritual beliefs, because as I said before, when dealing with the unknowable there really are no right or wrong answers. I do tend to take issue with people who try and force their beliefs on others, the "I'm right and you're wrong". This is where many organized religions are falling short, claiming to have answers rather than encouraging individuals to search for themselves.