I appreciate you deniers feel threatened when your echo-chamber is disrupted.
Uh-oh...
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
I appreciate you deniers feel threatened when your echo-chamber is disrupted.
And believe me, we truly appreciate your endless whining. Makes us appreciate how nice it is to be mentally and emotionally healthy.
the only whining I read here is the perpetual CC denier echo-chamber..... the denier whining really ramps up when someone has the apparent audacity to challenge the denying echo! :mrgreen: If only you CC deniers actually had game! You know, something other than the usual C&P prattle from the likes of this OP. I came back with a post that puts perspective on the "issue"... apparently, you have nothing to actually bring forward subject related. So you choose to whine instead. Go figure.
like I said: you have nothing to add thread subject matter related. So you whine about the disturbance within the CC denier echo-chamber!
as I said:
if only this board had a means to reign in those who perpetually choose to derail threads!
Funny. He claims derailing threads is BAD, except when he does it.
Come to think, he fits right in here.
again, you appear to have nothing to say thread subject matter related. Your whining is noted... has been noted. Are you attempting to derail this thread, as well? The CC denier echo-chamber force seems rather lame here if you're just going to perpetually whine.
I didn't derail - my initial post speaks directly to the OP and subject. You've added nothing in that regard. Is there a problem for you? Is there a reason you're unable to bring a subject related post forward?
you want an answer to something that has no bearing on this thread. I've answered your like nonsense in other threads. You're adding nothing new here... Mr. "Holocene Optimum Man"! :mrgreen: Funny thing is hey... I repeatedly challenged you in thread after thread to speak to your Holocene Optimum nonsense and frame it in regards to the relatively recent warming. Of course you refuse... typically you either run-away, start acting salty, throw your umpteenth insult... or you derail in another direction.
Derailer!!!
before I posted the following, there was nothing but the standard CC denier echo chamber being posted. If you care to stay within topic, you can take up the following post... you could do that, but you won't/can't. Instead you do what you do - you purposely derail threads.
a real fine echo-chamber in here! :mrgreen: Standard fare for CC deniers!
of course, once the details come forward it's understood that the authors found the issue in 8 of ~30 of the models... but that even within the 8, the resulting affect "averages out" to be a non-factor. None of the more profiled CMIP5 models have the issue. More pointedly, the paper itself states the issue doesn't have any impact on global temperature estimations. The issue reflects upon localized regional scales. But hey now member "skookumchuck" since you put your motor-mouth on mega-flap, are you aware of any CMIP5 models acting as localized regional "weather models"? :mrgreen:
of course, the global modeling community provides an inherent means for climate modelers to bring problems forward... all fully transparent and available online - a complete historical account of all problems identified in models and steps taken to review/resolve accordingly. Apparently, these authors felt a need to circumvent that normal practice and opt to create a formal paper. Geezaz, what's taking denier bloggers so long to tune into this historical account logging of identified problems... you know, so all you bedazzlers who know diddly about models can parrot something else - hey Locutus! :mrgreen: