Quebec Imam: "Beating [women] in Islam is a type of education"

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Ah, you're confused again. I sympathise, it must be tough going through life as. . . well. . . you.

Allow me to clarify. I think (and I'm sure Cliffy and Cannuck agree) that anybody who batters his wife (or kids, or anybody else for that matter) should be punished.

You think that because some Muzzies think that battering wives is OK, all Muzzies should be punished (including the wives, ironically) regardless of what they have or have not done, and that Christians who batter their wives should not be punished because most Christians don't believe in battering their wives.

So, all clarified. And see, Cliffy and Cannuck and me don't even think you should be punished for your loathsome "thoughts" (I hesitate to call them that). We only want you to be punished if you hit your wife (or somebody else).

of the 35% who replied they didn't support Shariah law here in Canada 100% were Muslim women :) :) :) :) ;)

So it's most likely 99% of Muslim men who want shariah law in Canada.

In this case
I have no problem with the idea of wiping them out.
 
Last edited:

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Genocide's always fun.

Considering they moved here with the idea to eventually imposes their beliefs on me or suffer death for being a infidel under shariah law. We can't rule out the possibility that what they are trying to do is not genocide. It's well documented they have tried many times to wipe us off the face of this earth in the name of their God. I don't see a reason to trust them fully now.

It's a dog eat dog world. Mercy can be a weakness if you trust the wrong people.

Unlike you I have no moral problem killing Muslims. They are not from our clans of humans. They do not share our beliefs.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,438
9,585
113
Washington DC
Considering they moved here with the idea to eventually imposes their beliefs on me or suffer death for being a infidel under shariah law. We can't rule out the possibility that what they are trying to do is not genocide. It's well documented they have tried many times to wipe us off the face of this earth in the name of their God. I don't see a reason to trust them fully now.

It's a dog eat dog world. Mercy can be a weakness if you trust the wrong people.

Unlike you I have no moral problem killing Muslims. They are not from our clans of humans. They do not share our beliefs.

Well, you've certainly justified the ones who hate you.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Well, you've certainly justified the ones who hate you.

No more then a year ago I was apolagizing for all their unacceptable behaviour the same way you have today all day. I'm done accepting their BS, their constant hatred and attaques have justified my behaviour.
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
Jonathan Halevi shares shocking video clips of Canadian Muslim leaders whose messages about women and equality conflict with Canadian values.

For example, video clips show two Calgary, Alberta Muslim leaders -- Imam Abdi Hersi and Mizz Haibibi -- instructing women to embrace patriarchy.

Hersi adds that wives must provide sex on demand to their husbands.

Halevi also presents a book called Women In Islam, that was available at Islam Awareness Week at York University and is handed out by street preachers at Toronto's Dundas Square.

Halevi says this book reflects conventional Muslim teachings as conveyed in Canada. It includes an approval of wife beating up to the point of "breaking a bone.

Then there's Imam Hussein Amer, who tells his audience -- twice -- that, "beating [women] in Islam is a type of education."

Remember: These aren't vicious slanders being spread by "Islamophobes."

He and I are simply presenting Canadian Muslim leaders in their own words:


Quebec Imam: "Beating [women] in Islam is a type of education" - The Rebel





That Muslim Iman sounds a lot like Republican Tom Cotton:




 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,582
8,164
113
B.C.
Ain't you supposed to be off worrying about the scary Saracens?

In answer to your question, you can print it out, fold the paper till it's all corners, and stuff it up your rear end.
Now those Saracens they were some kind of horse warriors .
But good ole Errol Flynn he got them every time .
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Georgia GOP Set to Pass Religious Exemption for Wife Beaters & Child Abusers

If that isn’t bad enough, Jeff Graham, executive director of Georgia Equality, told The Daily Beast that conservative district attorneys in two Georgia counties oppose the bill because it would give child abusers and wife beaters a religious defense:
We have found cases where people used their religious views as an excuse to impede an investigation into child-endangerment and child-abuse charges. They were not ultimately successful, but they did slow down the investigations. [Source]
With this bill, that will become more of an issue. Think about it; the law defines religious exercise as anything that is practiced by their religion, so a man can say he abused his wife and children because the Bible says its allowed.
The Bible makes it clear that women are supposed to serve their husbands:
Ephesians 5:22-24: Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything.
He just has to say that he was disciplining his unsubmissive wife. He was practicing his freedom of religion!


More: Georgia GOP Set to Pass Religious Exemption for Wife Beaters & Child Abusers | Occupy Democrats

What Angst and others failed to grasp, is this has never been about supporting beating women, it has always been about discrimination toward Muslims.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Georgia GOP Set to Pass Religious Exemption for Wife Beaters & Child Abusers

If that isn’t bad enough, Jeff Graham, executive director of Georgia Equality, told The Daily Beast that conservative district attorneys in two Georgia counties oppose the bill because it would give child abusers and wife beaters a religious defense:
We have found cases where people used their religious views as an excuse to impede an investigation into child-endangerment and child-abuse charges. They were not ultimately successful, but they did slow down the investigations. [Source]
With this bill, that will become more of an issue. Think about it; the law defines religious exercise as anything that is practiced by their religion, so a man can say he abused his wife and children because the Bible says its allowed.
The Bible makes it clear that women are supposed to serve their husbands:
Ephesians 5:22-24: Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything.
He just has to say that he was disciplining his unsubmissive wife. He was practicing his freedom of religion!


More: Georgia GOP Set to Pass Religious Exemption for Wife Beaters & Child Abusers | Occupy Democrats

What Angst and others failed to grasp, is this has never been about supporting beating women, it has always been about discrimination toward Muslims.

Sorry Cliffy, not in Canada, nice try though pal.

I openly admit, with the wave of Muslim arrested in the last few weeks. I don't have them in my hart.

Am I discriminating against Muslims? When is one allowed to discriminate against someone? I do not like Islam. I don't want to live with Muslims. Don't I have a right to not want them in my community?
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
now look, there's a perfectly good sky penis thread to be mucked with. off with you all.

that's right.

sky penis.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Did I say anything concerning the links?

You quoted them, so I'm asking. Does it bother you to be asked questions? Do you have a problem with clarity. You quoted two links and a statement by me. If you disagree with the links just say so and perhaps explain why you disagree with them. If you disagree with my statement, perhaps you could explain why you have a problem with making fun of hypocrites.