CONS Hand $26 Bil in no compete ship contract

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
“The price of the poker game has gone up without a competition,” said one lobbyist. “It’s great to have a Canadian company running a 30-year effort but what will it cost the taxpayer? If they’d held a competition, we could have seen five or six contenders.”


Others pointed out that the sole sourcing appeared to run contrary to the government’s much-vaunted Defence Procurement Strategy.
It certainly seems to violate government contract regulations that say sole sourcing is permissible “if only one person is capable of performing the contract.”


By handing the contract to a Canadian company, it may have fulfilled one of the procurement strategy’s goals, but it may not have gotten the best price, critics claim.


“The government wants 15 ships but they don’t have enough money for seven ships – and they have even less now. Nobody tested the market,” said one industry source.




more


John Ivison: $26B shock — Canada’s largest ever defence procurement handed off in sole-source contract | National Post
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Had this contract been handed-out to a foreign entity, you'd be pissing your pants in anger on not 'Buying Canadian'.

You might want to consider dropping the partisan politics and instead analyse the issue objectively.
 

Zipperfish

House Member
Apr 12, 2013
3,688
0
36
Vancouver
Had this contract been handed-out to a foreign entity, you'd be pissing your pants in anger on not 'Buying Canadian'.

You might want to consider dropping the partisan politics and instead analyse the issue objectively.

Yeah, at this point I'm just happy to see them get a frickin contract out the door. Bonus that it's a Canadian company.