Photons know a few tricks that physicists don't.

[socratus]

Photons know a few tricks that physicists don't.
==..
1. Einstein discovered photons *without mass*.
2. Dirac discovered virtual photons with *imaginary mass*.
3. Photons take part into photosynthesis and must have *positive mass*
( biological physics - quantum biology)
4. These three kinds of photons should not be imagined as being
the same kind of photons that we see from a flashlight.
==..
There isn't *Physics* without *Quantum Physics*.
There isn't * Biological Physics* without *Quantum Biology*.
Physics - - > Quantum Physics -- > Biological Physics - - > Quantum Biology
and photons take part in all these effects.
Photons are an enigma.
==..

 

[socratus]

1) Reality is based on particle dynamics (!)
Newton wrote:
" For the basic problem of philosophy seems to be to discover
the forces of nature from the phenomena of motions
and then to demonstrate the other phenomena from these forces."
/ Newton . /

2) Trying to "simulate photon's behavior" we are confused because
a) on the one hand, photon at constant speed c=1 knows a trick
to have infinite frequency and wavelength.
b) on the other hand, photon knows a trick to have specific
frequencies and wavelengths.
=.
Conclusion: We cannot understand the dynamical behavior of photon.
=.

 

[socratus]

One and the same photon is able to take part in different effects.
And in these different effects photon knows a few different tricks which
today cannot be understood and therefore photon is an enigma for us.

Einstein said:
" All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, **** and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken.'‘

This situation isn't changed.
How can one and the same photon take part in different effects
and which " tricks / technique" photon is using - we don't know.
===…

 

[bill barilko]

OK OK if you say so.

 

[coldstream]

is a photon a particle.. a unit of energy.. a wave.

some think there are gravitons as wells. Gravity and light define the major forces in nature.. electro magnetism.. and nuclear (strong and weak) forces.. would be molecular assemblies of photons and gravitons (i like the word plutons better.. that's of my own invention and refers ot the Roman God of the underworld). Photons and plutons are singularities which have no mass and no energy and do not occupy real space. Both photons and plutons transmit rather than carry energy. The energy has wave like qualities in time, but particle like qualities in space.

Seems to me i developed this theory while reading a book on the subject... physics for poets or something.. but i might have been drunk at the time.

 

[socratus]

1) In 1690 Huygens published his wave theory of light,
2) In 1704, Newton published Opticks, in which he expounded
his corpuscular theory of light.
3) In 1954 Einstein wrote:
" All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, **** and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken.'‘
4) Today's opinion is: photon can be particle and can be wave . . .
. . . . . . but . . . . " it is not wave nor particle".
==.
The problem is: to explain how the wave-particle (as " both /and / or")
is converted ( "to/ either/or") during the act of observation.
In my opinion, the key to understand photon (and this wave-particle
converts - duality) is hidden in the photon's geometrical form. (!)
The thought that photon is a "point" brings misunderstanding.
==..

 

[darkbeaver]

singularities do not exist,points do not exist, time does not exist, there are no constants in an e-field

Today, physicists labour under misconceptions about the nature of matter and space; the relationship between matter, mass and gravity; the electrical nature of stars and galaxies; and the size, history and age of the universe. So when astrophysicists turn to particle physicists to solve their intractable problems and particle physicists use it as an excuse for squandering billions of dollars on futile experiments, neither party recognizes that the other discipline is in a parlous state.” — Wal Thornhill

The ADMX started up in 1995 and has since found no evidence of axions. There is a planned upgrade that will take it into 2017. As of January 2014, LUX has returned a null result.

 

[socratus]

@darkbeaver
Many see the problems in physics, but . . . . the door is closed.
===

 

[darkbeaver]

@darkbeaver
Many see the problems in physics, but . . . . the door is closed.
===

I know you know. Those doors are about to be torn off the rusty hinges and never closed to science again. The old bloviating "experts" are finished, their servitude to capital and celebrity status made science fiction their best product. Mass is energy.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

(i like the word plutons better.. that's of my own invention and refers ot the Roman God of the underworld).

Geology has pre-empted you. A pluton is a mass of igneous rock that solidified below the earth's surface.

 

[socratus]

I know you know.
Those doors are about to be torn off the rusty hinges and never closed to science again.
The old bloviating "experts" are finished, their servitude to capital and celebrity status
made science fiction their best product. Mass is energy.

I am not so optimistic man as you.
Maybe the XXII century would change situation . .. . . .

 

[darkbeaver]

I am not so optimistic man as you.
Maybe the XXII century would change situation . .. . . .

Planck was right, the experts die, things change. Couldn't that process be enhanced by squaring the time factor? I favour the electric chair of course.

Geology has pre-empted you. A pluton is a mass of igneous rock that solidified below the earth's surface.

Laboratory experimentation in numerous plasma labs indicate Plutons to be fulgarites lots of them appear of relatively new deposition.

1) In 1690 Huygens published his wave theory of light,
2) In 1704, Newton published Opticks, in which he expounded
his corpuscular theory of light.
3) In 1954 Einstein wrote:
" All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, **** and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken.'‘
4) Today's opinion is: photon can be particle and can be wave . . .
. . . . . . but . . . . " it is not wave nor particle".
==.
The problem is: to explain how the wave-particle (as " both /and / or")
is converted ( "to/ either/or") during the act of observation.
In my opinion, the key to understand photon (and this wave-particle
converts - duality) is hidden in the photon's geometrical form. (!)
The thought that photon is a "point" brings misunderstanding.
==..

Aether.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

Laboratory experimentation in numerous plasma labs indicate Plutons to be fulgarites lots of them appear of relatively new deposition.

Sure Beave. Got a legitimate scientific citation for that claim?

 

[darkbeaver]

Sure Beave. Got a legitimate scientific citation for that claim?

I never will have as long as you pick and chose legitimate science. Most of the plutons are different compositions than the basement rock. Just like they were dropped on the topography or beamed into place. You see it in old switching gear all the time points in old mechanical ignition systems. Quite natural and observable at every scale.
The idea you support is just plain stupid.

 

[Dexter Sinister]

And what does that mean? Searching on that term generates a whole lot of stuff about kennels, dog breeding, and assorted medical and biological testing labs in Ransom, Kansas, nothing relevant to your claim.

 

[darkbeaver]

And what does that mean? Searching on that term generates a whole lot of stuff about kennels, dog breeding, and assorted medical and biological testing labs in Ransom, Kansas, nothing relevant to your claim.

Yeah, see how factual science is suppressed. Google knows what you believe and look for.

Stone Monoliths Part Two
Posted on May 28, 2014 by Stephen Smith
El Capitan, a giant granite monolith in Yosemite National Park. Image Credit: Mike Murphy.
El Capitan, a giant granite monolith in Yosemite National Park. Image Credit: Mike Murphy.



May 29, 2014

Stones as large as mountains could be physical evidence for interplanetary lightning bolts on Earth.

In the last installment about immense solitary stones that are found all over the world, it was noted that several of them in Australia and Europe could be the result of tremendous electric arcs. The magnetic fields created from such forces may have lifted the sediments and other materials from the surrounding landscape, crushed it in compression zones capable of squeezing sand into stone, and left behind a solidified mass. Some extraordinary formations are located in areas where there is nothing around except flat desert for thousands of square kilometers.

Sometimes the stone monoliths are made from several minerals that are fused into a solid, although the various crystals retain their shapes. Granite is an example of different minerals that have been fused into a single stone and then laid down in enormous beds – although there are almost as many different kinds of granite as there are deposits.

Granite is com

 

[Dexter Sinister]

Yeah, see how factual science is suppressed. Google knows what you believe and look for.

I don't use Google's search engine. There's no data in what you cited, it's all "could be" and "may have," just speculation, and there are perfectly satisfactory conventional explanations for formations like El Capitan. You'll have to do better than that.

 

[darkbeaver]

I don't use Google's search engine. There's no data in what you cited, it's all "could be" and "may have," just speculation, and there are perfectly satisfactory conventional explanations for formations like El Capitan. You'll have to do better than that.

You know what the man said "science is the belief in the ignorance of experts". Why don't you believe in science? It's not complete you know, there's a few things left to iron out yet. I don't have to do better than that. The conventional explanation is completely wrong, a relic of the age of sliderules and pith helmets. I bet you believe in plates subducting into solid stone.